Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> [bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -e --test gkrellm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> gkrellm >= 2.2.0 is needed by (installed)
> gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-18.fc23.x86_64
>
> I guess the --test stops it from actually erasing anything?
That's the idea.
On 11/28/15 05:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -e --test sane-backends-drivers-scanners
$
The simplest way of checking whether there are dependencies on a package.
Yes, F23 GNOME Workstation comes with this package pre-installed (just not
as a dependency). It used to be a bug in at least one o
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:11:32 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > Nope. It's there in F22:
> >
> > [root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
> > sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
> > sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-
On 11/25/2015 12:11 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why it did
On 11/25/15 13:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why it didn't get installed on Bob's system by the upd
On 11/25/2015 10:46 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
Probably a new package with f23
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why
On 11/25/2015 10:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and as root and s
Probably a new package with f23
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
> On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
>>> scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
>>>
>>
>> Does "sane-find-scanner" detect
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and as root and see "man sane-usb").
On 11/25/2015 09:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
D
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://
On 11/25/15 09:27, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
.
I've plugged it in numerous times,
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just discovered that I can not use my
13 matches
Mail list logo
