On 01/19/2012 11:26 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/19/2012 11:21 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/19/2012 11:22 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/18/2012 05:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/18/2012 03:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm seeing 389-ds-base 1.2.10-0.6.a6.el5 in epel testing, bu
On 01/19/2012 11:21 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/19/2012 11:22 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/18/2012 05:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/18/2012 03:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm seeing 389-ds-base 1.2.10-0.6.a6.el5 in epel testing, but only
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.el6 in epel-test
On 01/19/2012 11:22 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/18/2012 05:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/18/2012 03:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm seeing 389-ds-base 1.2.10-0.6.a6.el5 in epel testing, but only
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.el6 in epel-testing-389-ds-base. Is this
repo still
active?
On 01/18/2012 05:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 01/18/2012 03:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm seeing 389-ds-base 1.2.10-0.6.a6.el5 in epel testing, but only
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.el6 in epel-testing-389-ds-base. Is this repo still
active?
Updated - try it now
Still seems old. Am I usi