Re: [389-users] Upgrade failure

2013-12-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/03/2013 03:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 12/03/2013 02:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/03/2013 03:11 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Now I remember... there's no Windows sync in the RHEL package. Yes, there is. Do you mean POSIX Windows Sync? I'm uncertain. You mentioned this in 2011

Re: [389-users] Upgrade failure

2013-12-03 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/03/2013 02:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/03/2013 03:11 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Now I remember... there's no Windows sync in the RHEL package. Yes, there is. Do you mean POSIX Windows Sync? I'm uncertain. You mentioned this in 2011: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389

Re: [389-users] Upgrade failure

2013-12-03 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/25/2013 03:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Is there some reason you need to upgrade from the OS provided official RHEL 6.4 version of 389-ds-base to the non-OS provided version from the rmeggins epel6 repo? Now I remember... there's no Windows sync in the RHEL package. We needed that in at

[389-users] Upgrade failure

2013-11-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Friday, I updated one of several systems that I manage from version 1.2.11.15 to version 1.2.11.25. Thereafter, the service was unable to start. The error indicates a problem with SSL that I don't understand. I've included the relevant section from the "error" log below. After reverting