On 04.04.2011, fred smith wrote:
> yeah, mine too. clearly a broken script, attemting to throw
> output away but missing the 'n'.
Yes. The fix is rather trivial, just correct the .spec file,
compile gdm and force-install the resulting .rpm.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:57:58PM +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, JD wrote:
> > On 04/02/2011 11:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> rpm -q --scripts gdm|grep /ull
> > I see :) :)
> > gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor >&
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, JD wrote:
> On 04/02/2011 11:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> rpm -q --scripts gdm|grep /ull
> I see :) :)
> gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor >&/dev/ull || :
> gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor >&/dev/ul
On 04/02/2011 11:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> rpm -q --scripts gdm|grep /ull
I see :) :)
gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor >&/dev/ull || :
gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor >&/dev/ull || :
Looks like the script writer missed the 'n' TWIC
//pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdm.git;a=commitdiff;h=edd6f020dab392a6da1cdf4d3f68b461160200c5
> >>
> Guys, I have done a full update of FC14, I run gnome,
> I rebooted a few times, and have not seen the /dev/ull entry.
Rebooting is irrelevant in this case. Run "rpm -q --scripts gdm|grep /ull"
then take a c
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 01:54 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
>> I can confirm this too. Is their a bug report where I can follow?
>
> Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and search on /dev/ull
>
Sorry should have thought of doing that befor
gt; gdm-2_30_0-1_fc14
>> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010
> I can confirm this too. Is their a bug report where I can follow?
>
>> actually:
>>
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdm.git;a=commitdiff;h=edd6f020dab392a6da1cdf4d3f68b461160200c5
>>
Guys, I have done a fu
On 04/03/2011 01:54 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> I can confirm this too. Is their a bug report where I can follow?
Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and search on /dev/ull
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson
Crusoe. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Descript
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:44:47 -0500, Michael wrote:
>
>> On 04/02/2011 10:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>> > Apr 02 10:20:53 Updated: 1:gdm-2.32.1-2.fc14.i686
>>
>> It was GDM[1]. You should file a bug so the maintainer can fix it.
>>
>> [1]
>
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:44:47 -0500, Michael wrote:
> On 04/02/2011 10:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> > Apr 02 10:20:53 Updated: 1:gdm-2.32.1-2.fc14.i686
>
> It was GDM[1]. You should file a bug so the maintainer can fix it.
>
> [1]
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdm.git;a=blob;f=gdm.sp
On 04/02/2011 09:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 04/02/2011 10:23 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>>
>> File '/dev/ull' present on /dev. Possible hidden file.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Based on the timestamp, it was one of these updates:
>
> Apr 02 10:20:43 Update
On 04/02/2011 10:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Apr 02 10:20:53 Updated: 1:gdm-2.32.1-2.fc14.i686
It was GDM[1]. You should file a bug so the maintainer can fix it.
[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdm.git;a=blob;f=gdm.spec;h=3ef795278d95d17bdafb808a911ee07ab3daa076;hb=03b224c7ca74092f8
On 04/02/2011 10:23 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Both of my F14 systems had a file, /dev/ull, created during updates run
> today. Does anyone else have /dev/ull? (note, not "null" but "ull".)
>
> OSSEC got very excited about it.
>
> Received From: mooch
Both of my F14 systems had a file, /dev/ull, created during updates run
today. Does anyone else have /dev/ull? (note, not "null" but "ull".)
OSSEC got very excited about it.
Received From: mooch->rootcheck
Rule: 510 fired (level 7) -> "Host-based anomaly detection
14 matches
Mail list logo
