On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 10:51 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 06/07/2018 05:44 PM, home user via users wrote:
> > Even before the "F28 - Today's updates messed up writing to USB" thread, I
> > always rebooted after any update that involved anything "kernel". I
> > appreciate the re-assurance.
> >
(responding to 4 posts)
I had heard of "Helen", and I heard of "the face that launched a thousand
ships". But I didn't know it was Helen that had the face that launched the
thousand ships. I had never heard of the term "millihelen" prior to Rick's
post. Many jokes like this depend on a word h
On 06/07/2018 05:44 PM, home user via users wrote:
> Even before the "F28 - Today's updates messed up writing to USB" thread, I
> always rebooted after any update that involved anything "kernel". I
> appreciate the re-assurance.
>
> Only one last concern:
>> Millihelen (n): The amount of beauty
On 06/07/2018 05:44 PM, home user via users wrote:
Only one last concern:
Millihelen (n): The amount of beauty required to launch one ship.
I know that "milli" is a thousandth, but I don't get this joke.
Helen of Troy, of course, was the face that launched a thousand ships.
__
On 06/07/2018 05:44 PM, home user via users wrote:
Even before the "F28 - Today's updates messed up writing to USB" thread, I always
rebooted after any update that involved anything "kernel". I appreciate the re-assurance.
Only one last concern:
Millihelen (n): The amount of beauty required t
On 06/08/18 08:44, home user via users wrote:
> Only one last concern:
>> Millihelen (n): The amount of beauty required to launch one ship.
> I know that "milli" is a thousandth, but I don't get this joke.
Ask yourself the question: "Whose face was it that launched a thousand ships?"
--
Conject
Even before the "F28 - Today's updates messed up writing to USB" thread, I
always rebooted after any update that involved anything "kernel". I appreciate
the re-assurance.
Only one last concern:
> Millihelen (n): The amount of beauty required to launch one ship.
I know that "milli" is a thousan
On 06/07/2018 02:56 PM, home user via users wrote:
> (replying to everyone)
>
> (Rick)
>> "uname -r" will show you the currently running kernel:
>
> (Joe)
>> uname -r
>
> I get:
> -
> bash.1[~]: uname -r
> 4.16.13-200.fc27.x86_64
> bash.2[~]:
> -
> That matched the dnf log line, so appar
(replying to everyone)
(Rick)
> "uname -r" will show you the currently running kernel:
(Joe)
> uname -r
I get:
-
bash.1[~]: uname -r
4.16.13-200.fc27.x86_64
bash.2[~]:
-
That matched the dnf log line, so apparently the update was successful;
this is not a real problem.
(Tom)
> This h
