Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/14/15 06:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> David Cary Hart wrote:
>>
>>> their KDE spin takes less than half the tim
>> Considering fedora's live install is not much more than dd'ing the live
>> iso directly to disk, I find it interesting that some other method could
>> be over t
On 06/14/15 06:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Cary Hart wrote:
>
>> their KDE spin takes less than half the tim
> Considering fedora's live install is not much more than dd'ing the live iso
> directly to disk, I find it interesting that some other method could be over
> twice as fast.
>
Guess wh
On 14 June 2015 at 00:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
> David Cary Hart wrote:
>
>> their KDE spin takes less than half the tim
>
> Considering fedora's live install is not much more than dd'ing the live iso
> directly to disk, I find it interesting that some other method could be over
> twice as fast.
>
>
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 17:45 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Considering fedora's live install is not much more than dd'ing the
> live iso directly to disk, I find it interesting that some other
> method could be over twice as fast.
Size of it? DVD ISO vs CD ISO?
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Lin
David Cary Hart wrote:
> their KDE spin takes less than half the tim
Considering fedora's live install is not much more than dd'ing the live iso
directly to disk, I find it interesting that some other method could be over
twice as fast.
-- Rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject
2015-06-13 4:35 GMT+02:00, Tim :
>> As Joe says, if you want to go the upgrade route, go incrementally
>> (F18->F19->F20->F21->F22). You might get by with F18->F20->F22, but
>> sometimes skipping the interim steps can cause issues, too. It's your
>> choice.
>
> That's a hell of a lot of downloadin
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:27 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I'd suggest a fresh install. There's a lot of stuff that changed very
> significantly between F18 and F22. You would probably spend more time
> sorting out problems for each upgrade step than just doing a fresh
> install and restoring the use
On 06/12/2015 07:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/13/15 00:46, David Cary Hart wrote:
I have been experimenting with some virtual machines lately for bug tracking. I
am no fan of Ubuntu but the install of their KDE spin takes less than half the
time and it installs updated packages from their re
On 06/12/2015 04:49 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/12/2015 04:37 PM, Mickey wrote:
I have a friends computer here that I have to upgrade from F18 to F22,
Is it better to do a netinstall upgrade or a Fresh install of F22 ?
Most people who don't reject upgrades completely say that you shouldn't
skip
On 06/12/2015 04:37 PM, Mickey wrote:
I have a friends computer here that I have to upgrade from F18 to F22,
Is it better to do a netinstall upgrade or a Fresh install of F22 ?
Most people who don't reject upgrades completely say that you shouldn't
skip more than one version in upgrading. In
On 06/12/2015 07:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/13/15 00:46, David Cary Hart wrote:
I have been experimenting with some virtual machines lately for bug tracking. I
am no fan of Ubuntu but the install of their KDE spin takes less than half the
time and it installs updated packages from their
On 06/13/15 00:46, David Cary Hart wrote:
> I have been experimenting with some virtual machines lately for bug tracking.
> I am no fan of Ubuntu but the install of their KDE spin takes less than half
> the time and it installs updated packages from their repositories. The Fedora
> KDE spin resu
I have been experimenting with some virtual machines lately for bug
tracking. I am no fan of Ubuntu but the install of their KDE spin takes
less than half the time and it installs updated packages from their
repositories. The Fedora KDE spin results in a machine requiring (with
just base packag
13 matches
Mail list logo
