Le 27 mars 2012 22:52, Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
> Doubt it but did you try what I wrote to the first reporter?
>
> >
> > dac_overrride means that you have a process running as root trying to
> modify a file that is not owned by root. Usually this means you have a
> file with the incorrect owners
Le 27 mars 2012 16:36, Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
> Are you seeing avc messages when you try to change the date/time.
>
> ausearch -m avc -ts recent
>
Yes I am:
time->Tue Mar 27 21:07:27 2012
type=AVC msg=audit(1332875247.972:80): avc: denied { dac_override } for
pid=1962 comm="kcmdatetimehelp"
Le 21 mars 2012 15:25, Marko Vojinovic a écrit :
> Thanks Dan! I followed your advice on that page and managed to track down
> several files in my system with the wrong context. A restorecon on that
> files
> fixed the problem. Just to be on the safe side, I did a systemwide
> restorecon,
> and f
I forgot to CC the list when I wrote these messages:
First message:
I found something weird and I wonder if I should report a bug in the setup
> package or not.
> I've created /etc/profile.d/custom.sh, where I redefine PATH in order to
> have /usr/local after /usr for all users.
> But the files i
Le 17 mars 2012 15:29, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 03/17/2012 05:21 PM, enclair wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
> > Where is it defined?
> > In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
> >
> >
>
>
Hi,
By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
Where is it defined?
In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http:
head -n 6 /etc/grub2.cfg
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
Le 25 février 2012 18:16, Frank Murphy a écrit :
> On 25/02/12 16:48, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> In which file are thes
I was wrong.
Le 23 février 2012 20:20, T.C. Hollingsworth a
écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, enclair wrote:
> > Yes I could do that, thank you.
> > (However, it must be set to "keep" I think, not "0", according to man
> > yum.conf).
>
>
Yes I could do that, thank you.
(However, it must be set to "keep" I think, not "0", according to man
yum.conf).
Le 23 février 2012 19:13, T.C. Hollingsworth a
écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM, enclair wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have th
Hi,
I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6
There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7).
If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9.
Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) and
to remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)?
(There is the possibil
10 matches
Mail list logo