On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:20:37AM -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
>
>How can I tell NetworkManager not to change my /etc/resolv.conf file
>or do I need to just stop using NM? These are fixed F-17/64
>computers and I use NM simply because it's there and works, however
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:10:02PM +, Bill Oliver wrote:
>
> Odd -- I thought "wheel" had been deprecated years ago, and was kept in
> only for backwards compatibility. Who knew.
>
reference?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:43:54AM +, Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2012 16:05:49 lee wrote:
>
> A kludge to fix this is to make resolv.conf immutable. Then
> NetworkManager or nothing else can interfere with it.
>
> Set up /etc/resolv.conf as you want it.
>
> Then as root:
>
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> It appears that among some kernel maintainers there's an opinion that
> the hibernate (suspend to disk) capability is of insufficient interest
> to users to justify the difficulty of maintenance.
>
Personally, hibernation is quite a useful
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Joachim Backes <
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote:
> If I resume from suspend on my desktop box I'm asked for the login
> password. But after resuming from hibernation, no password is requested.
>
Well, it's the same with Ubuntu 11.10, and maybe many other Linu
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Any documentation to set up sudoers file apart from man sudoers ?
Maybe you can refer to the /etc/sudoers itself, there are some examples in
it.
cat /etc/sudoers, which needs root priviledge.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> [Please, don't top-post; see the list Guidelines]
>
> That's not really it. The builtins are built in either because they're
> part of the Shell programming language or because they affect the
> Shell's own environment, e.g. its current
to be implemented within the shell.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 19Dec2011 12:47, Zind wrote:
> | I did consult the manual of zsh and bash.
> | But I didn't realize that command 'type' is implemented within the shell.
> | I thought maybe
I did consult the manual of zsh and bash.
But I didn't realize that command 'type' is implemented within the shell.
I thought maybe something is missing in the zsh manual of command 'type'.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 18Dec2011 22:5
Thanks a trillion. :-)
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:58 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth <
tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Zind wrote:
> > hi, all
> > Here is my execution result of the 'type -t' command:
> > % type -t powero
hi, all
Here is my execution result of the 'type -t' command:
% type -t poweroff
zsh: bad option: -t
% bash
$ type -t poweroff
file
$ zsh --version
zsh 4.3.11 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
zsh warns 'bad option -t', but bash works fine
I test it on Ubuntu 11.10 & Fedora 15, but no change.
Any help or sugges
11 matches
Mail list logo
