Re: AMD GPU not used by Fedora 31

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 23:19 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > The hybrid pc's have always been > > a bit troublesome to configure. As recent AMD graphics runs under > > Wayland without problems it might have something to do with the age > > of your AMD chip and/or the hybrid complication. > > I

Re: Alpine curiosity

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 11:11 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/20/20 10:47 AM, AV wrote: > > OK the experiment (In reply to Samuel Sieb) > > Looks like your mail server doesn't require a login when you're > inside > their network. Wouldn't that be a rather curious situation. (And none of the m

Re: AMD GPU not used by Fedora 31

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 23:19 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > The hybrid pc's have always been > > a bit troublesome to configure. As recent AMD graphics runs under > > Wayland without problems it might have something to do with the age > > of your AMD chip and/or the hybrid complication. > > I

Re: Alpine curiosity

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 14:57 +0200, AV wrote: > > > > Yesterday I had an hour to spare so I decided to > > have a look at the Alpine email client. > > I installed and did a minimal config only adding > > imap, smtp and sender. No pass

Re: AMD GPU not used by Fedora 31

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 11:27 +, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > With Optimus, output of the hardware graphics processor is sent > > to the frame buffer of the integrated graphics processor. > > I don't have Optimus as my laptop is old. Have a look at this url: https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-D

Re: Alpine curiosity

2020-04-20 Thread VO
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 08:25 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:57:31 +0200 AV wrote: > > > I have been a longtime user of mutt but switched to > > evolution and/of geary to have less configuration > > hassle. > > Yesterday I had an hour to spare so I decided to > > have a look a

Re: Yum strange behavior after upgrade to Release 14 [SOLVED]

2010-12-02 Thread John Vo
On 12/01/2010 04:12 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > John Vo wrote: >> I'm a casual Fedora users. Help please. >> > Run: > > # package-cleanup --cleandupes I ran : # yum distro-sync # package-cleanup --cleandupes Thank you all for your help.

Re: Yum strange behavior after upgrade to Release 14

2010-12-01 Thread John Vo
It worked. Then I ran the remove dups command. Now there's no error. -Thanks all. -John On 12/01/2010 04:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > John Vo wrote: >> Did that. Got the following: >> >> Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected >>

Re: Yum strange behavior after upgrade to Release 14

2010-12-01 Thread John Vo
On 12/01/2010 04:12 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > John Vo wrote: >> I'm a casual Fedora users. Help please. >> > Run: > > # package-cleanup --cleandupes Did that. Got the following: Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected You could try using -

Yum strange behavior after upgrade to Release 14

2010-12-01 Thread John Vo
is a duplicate with PackageKit-gtk-module-0.6.6-2.fc13.x86_64 I'm a casual Fedora users. Help please. Thanks. -- Best Regards, ____ John Vo Network Administrator Eagle Teleconferencing Services, Inc. j...@eagle.net Direct:+1.212.200.2005 Office: