m with an upgrade or re-install, then that's when
I'll update. For now, it is running - and that's better than being broken.
Shane
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On 10/07/2015 12:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/07/2015 11:14 AM, Shane wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Fedora18 x86_64. (Yes, it's old.) Within the last few days I found that I cannot
install or list anything from the fedora-18 repo via yum. I get the typical errors everybody
complains
um problem on my system.
Is there something else I can try (yum-wise)? If I need to report it
then where? I'm quite certain that this is the wrong list.
Thanks.
Shane
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
th Grub2 that I haven't been able to find?
I have also tried running the net install cd but it won't let me just
install everything under the / on a 25GB lv with a 5GB swap lv.
Thank you in advance.
--
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment
--
users mailing list
Ran into an odd problem this morning, I have two seperate systems installed
over the last two days where Grub is ignoring the time out in the grub.cfg
file. Anyone seen this, had this problem, or know how to resolve it?
Thanks
--
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment
--
users
can at least salvage some of the data.
Haven't tried that though. Good luck
Shane
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:53 AM, LinuX wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a scenario I'm not familiar with the answer regarding linux LVM. How
> do I systematically deal or solve a problem
same issue today. It's a bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912616 . A fix was pushed
yesterday. I'm waiting on the fix.
Shane
Thanx!
EGO II
SELinux is preventing /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-hostnamed from open
access on the file /sys/devices/virtual
l states should be bounded. At least bounded from the standpoint of
returning to user-level for further action (either re-invocation of the
wait or exiting). Let the app-layer determine what to do if the lower
level can't do something - the app-layer is free to re-invoke the
On 03/17/2012 07:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 23:59, schrieb Shane:
On 03/17/2012 05:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 22:30, schrieb Jim:
On 03/17/2012 01:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 14:34, schrieb Jim:
I know this may not be the place for this post, but
punge viruses. What makes you think
copyrighted material detection requires a person constantly watching
your traffic? Yes, there are appliances that can monitor transfers and
can block copyrighted material. You only need to do web searches to
find the manufacturers.
Shane
--
user
led it on my
linux boxes because it's just more background radiation on my network.
You could also look at your router config to see if you can turn off
mDNS (if you don't want to disable your avahi-daemon).
Shane
I went to CISCO to determine what the resolution was.
1. Live Chat s
it surprise you to
learn that a good many enterprise-level network manufacturers have best
practices that employ MAC filtering (in combination with other features)
as a method for securing enterprise-level networks against unwanted entry?
Shane
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 05/15/2011 12:45 AM, JD wrote:
> On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote:
>> On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote:
>>> On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>>> On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote:
>>>>>> Can you add a "special" stat
lags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00
> wlan0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG0 00
> wlan0
>
> I removed interfaces eth0 and virbr0 (i.e. I deactivated them)
60 127.0.0.1 UHS 00lo0
So, the next question is; is there something in the host that is
actually listening for packets destined for 192.168.1.60? Because at
this point, it looks like any packets destined for 192.168.1.60 hit
127.0.0.1 and then die for the
15 matches
Mail list logo
