Le 29/01/2018 à 00:45, Emmett Culley a écrit :
> I am not sure why php-fpm is suddenly getting used on my workstation. I did
> not install it, nor did I enable it in systemd. A couple of days ago I was
> modifying one of the sites that stopped working, and all was working as
> expected. Then
Le 20/02/2014 14:43, Robert P. J. Day a écrit :
> is that considered good package design? it may be that there are
> some packages that absolutely need some webserver feature that is
> provided only by httpd, but is it also possible that some packages are
> being unnecessarily restrictive? just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 14/06/2013 13:29, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> However it has been told that FastCGI provide also a performance
>> increase so, we would like to reach it also :)
Faster than CGI, probably, but nearly nobody use CGI nowadays ;)
> ok, fire them real
Le 14/06/2013 14:33, Rafnews a écrit :
> Situation:
> i installed on Fedora 18 a webserver where i need:
> - FastCGI
> - to use my standard fedora user account (let's say "rafnews") to
> edit/move/delete files/folder in my webroot /var/www/html folders, where
> files have 644 as permissions and fo
Le 11/04/2013 10:45, Virágh János a écrit :
>> Does we really need to allow apache to "write" the moodle web pages ?
>
> Yes, we do - during the *configuration* of moodle
No, configuration should be in /etc/moodle,
not within the static content.
Please read FHS.
So my current recommendation f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 10/04/2013 15:46, Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
> On 04/10/2013 02:03 AM, Ester Muoz Aparicio wrote:
>> El 10/04/13 00:47, M A Young escribi:
>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Vir￡gh J￡nos wrote:
>>>
After
#yum install moodle
what's
Le 19/09/2012 19:30, Mark Haney a écrit :
> Can someone tell me why the mysql-test-run.pl file is missing from the
> mysql-test package? (F17, that is) Most docs on the web indicate that
> the perl script is the way to initiate a test. Am I missing something?
>
I see it
=> /usr/share/mysql-test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 12/09/2012 09:51, François Patte a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> In order to write a readme for the installation of php scripts on a
> web server, I would like to know if it is possible to deactivate
> (without uninstalling them) php packages installed o
Le 28/12/2011 16:10, Klaus-Peter Schrage a écrit :
>> Have you the following SOMEWHERE in your httpd-conf-files?
>> LoadModule php5_module "modules/libphp5.so"
>> AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
>>
>
> Yes, adding those two lines did it: Now I can see the PHP Info page.
This 2 lines should
Le 18/09/2011 12:33, suvayu ali a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to figure this out but so far haven't had any
> success. I want to run jobs weekly, every 4 weeks (i.e. monthly) and
> every 52 weeks (i.e. yearly) on a specific time on a Monday.
>
> I tried using the 1/ notation
>
> 00 2 *
Le 26/07/2011 15:34, Stephen Berg (Contractor) a écrit :
> The createrepo package that comes with Fedora 15 (0.9.9-3) is unable to
> generate repos using SHA1. This has caused me to downgrade createrepo
> to the Fedora 14 version (0.9.8-5) because the system hosts some local
> repos for Scienti
I'm used to work with eclipse-phpeclipse (from the repository)
After installing eclipse-egit and eclipse-jgit, PHP project are no more
available...
After removing git stuff, workspace, .eclipse, reinstalling eclipse,
still not working...
PHP Eclipse is listed in the Installed software, but not a
Le 24/03/2011 02:38, James M. Leddy a écrit :
> Only thing I had to edit from the f14 rpms was the false dependcy for
> 0.7 libnotify. Let me know if I forgot any deps, but I think all it is
> is xulrunner and firefox:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/jleddy/firefox4/
>
Why another one ... ?
spot [
Le 11/03/2011 14:00, Jim Philips a écrit :
> I can't manage to update to RC1. When I try, yum tells me it depends on
> gecko-libs 2.0 RC1 and that package is not available. Anyone
> successfully update from the Remi repo?
>
# rpm -q --requires firefox4 | grep gecko
gecko-libs(x86-64) = 2.0-rc1
#
Le 04/03/2011 18:00, Linuxguy123 a écrit :
> Anyone running them ? How are they ?
Fast... fast... (see bench result on my blog)
>
> Is there a way to run both Firefox 3.6.x and the Firefox 4 beta without
> messing things up ?
There is (at least) 2 repo which provides firefox4 RPM (which can be
Le 28/01/2011 21:22, Andrew Dietz a écrit :
> but still, phpinfo(() tells me the sqlite modules are not configured to
> load:
>
> Configure Command './configure' (...) '--without-sqlite'
> '--disable-pdo' '--without-sqlite3' (...)
>
Read :
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/09/29/phpi
> You are correct, I stand corrected. The enigmain main page only states
> 32-bit, but when you click on the download page you can get the 64-bit
> version.
addons.mozilla only provides extensions for official package.
And mozilla only provides 32 bits build of Firefox.
All 64 bits package are on
Le 26/06/2010 16:32, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Enigmail's help files indicate that it may have something to do with
> getting a version compiled to be compatible with "your distribution".
> As far as I can tell, only 1.0.1 is in rpmfusion, so I'll wait a few
> days and try again.
Version "compati
Le 26/06/2010 05:39, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-
Le 03/06/2010 07:04, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>> If a package does not get negative karma, I think the 2-week-wait /
>> push-to-stable treatment is reasonable. YMMV.
+1
> With the exception of critical security and bug fixes which needs to be
> tested but for a shorter period of time.
+1
I a
Le 09/05/2010 11:30, Philip Rhoades a écrit :
> People,
>
> If I look at the source of this mail with an editor, the body of the
> mail looks like this:
>
> LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
> LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KRmVkb3JhIFVwZGF0ZSBOb3RpZmlj
21 matches
Mail list logo
