a separate set of processes
No with mod_php
For more explanation, you could read:
https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/11/17/Fedora-27-changes-in-http-and-php
Remi
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
des some "httpd" configuration file, it must, of
course, requires httpd.
For PHP web-app, mod_php + httpd is the only working "out-of-the-box"
solution.
Yes it will be nice to have web-app with working configuration for all
available webserver just a dream (for user) or
in Fedora).
But mod_php still the most flexible solution as it's the only one
which allow you to use simply:
alias (else you need 1 Proxy config per alias)
multiviews (/foo/bar calling /foo.php)
directoryindex (index.php)
access right per directory
xy:error] [pid 24500]
> (111)Connection refused: AH00957: FCGI: attempt to connect to
> 127.0.0.1:8000 (*) failed
> [Fri Jun 14 14:16:07.827539 2013] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 24500] [client
> 127.0.0.1:40982] AH01079: failed to make connection to backend: 127.0.0.1
qed.
Note default FPM
current recommendation for this package : don't use it, as it
doesn't conform to guidelines / FHS, and have no additional value from
the upstream tarball.
Remi
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
t; they have a certain version of moodle in their servers. To keep
>> everything simple, I installed in my computer the same version
>> they have and I do not want yum to update it.
>
>> To put it to work, I ended up using the rpm from moodle.org, and
>> yum localinst
Le 19/09/2012 19:30, Mark Haney a écrit :
> Can someone tell me why the mysql-test-run.pl file is missing from the
> mysql-test package? (F17, that is) Most docs on the web indicate that
> the perl script is the way to initiate a test. Am I missing something?
>
I see it
=> /usr/share/mysql-test
he phpci command (from php-bartlett-PHP-Compatinfo
package) which comes with a lot of usefull reports.
Remi.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlBQdtkACgkQYUppBSnxahh09Q
I'm used to backport latest version of Firefox and Thunderbird for 2 EOL fedora
version,
Search for "remi repo".
But, of course, I still recommend the upgrade to a maintained version of fedora.
Remi.
- Mail original -
> Yes, I know F14 is EOL, but I am wonderi
ed Libraries), and exception was denied for
this package.
2 quite simple solutions
- pecl install zip (well, will requires a lots -devel stuff)
- use remi repo (backport from fedora with zip extension enabled)
I understand this are not real good solution...
I still think exception should be reconsi
can see the PHP Info page.
This 2 lines should be present in /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf, provided
by php package.
So httpd.conf doesn't have to be modified.
Remi.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
-c /etc/rsnapshot.conf yearly
# First monday of each month
20 2 1-7 * 1 /usr/bin/rsnapshot -c /etc/rsnapshot.conf monthly
# All mondays
40 2 * * 1 /usr/bin/rsnapshot -c /etc/rsnapshot.conf weekly
Remi.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
ot;rawhide" which should fix the issue
2/ try the version in my repo
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/15/remi/i386/repoview/createrepo.html
This is the version I use for the "remi" repo (which include EL-5).
Remi.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
I'm used to work with eclipse-phpeclipse (from the repository)
After installing eclipse-egit and eclipse-jgit, PHP project are no more
available...
After removing git stuff, workspace, .eclipse, reinstalling eclipse,
still not working...
PHP Eclipse is listed in the Installed software, but not a
er one ... ?
spot [1] already provides a "firefox4" (parallel install)
and I [2] already provides a "firefox" (replace standard)
And xulrunner-2.0 is probably a bad idea for f14
(except if you also want to rebuild all package which use it)
Remi.
[1] http://repos.fedorape
Le 11/03/2011 14:00, Jim Philips a écrit :
> I can't manage to update to RC1. When I try, yum tells me it depends on
> gecko-libs 2.0 RC1 and that package is not available. Anyone
> successfully update from the Remi repo?
>
# rpm -q --requires firefox4 | grep gecko
gecko-libs(
M (which can be
installed beside firefox 3.6)
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/firefox4/
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2011/03/01/Firefox-4.0-Beta-12
Remi.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject
gt;
Read :
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/09/29/phpinfo-BUG-or-PEBKAC
Remi.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
ckage are only "contrib".
enigmail*.xpi is build on Arch Linux with gcc 4.5.0,
An XPI extension is installed in the user profiles.
The RpmFusion (or remi) RPM is always build on fedora, with the same
build system than thunderbird and is available system wide (in all
profiles of all u
Le 26/06/2010 16:32, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Enigmail's help files indicate that it may have something to do with
> getting a version compiled to be compatible with "your distribution".
> As far as I can tell, only 1.0.1 is in rpmfusion, so I'll wait a few
> days and try again.
Version "compati
Le 26/06/2010 05:39, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-
Le 03/06/2010 07:04, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>> If a package does not get negative karma, I think the 2-week-wait /
>> push-to-stable treatment is reasonable. YMMV.
+1
> With the exception of critical security and bug fixes which needs to be
> tested but for a shorter period of time.
+1
I a
Le 09/05/2010 11:30, Philip Rhoades a écrit :
> People,
>
> If I look at the source of this mail with an editor, the body of the
> mail looks like this:
>
> LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
> LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KRmVkb3JhIFVwZGF0ZSBOb3RpZmlj
23 matches
Mail list logo
