>
> On 06/16/14 04:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 06/16/14 16:37, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> >> > So there is still a considerable difference in what each of them
> >> > does here,
> > I ran into this the other day. It would seem the way dnf
> handles caching is different from
n 14.02.2014 09:52, Paul Knox-Kennedy wrote:
> > Since F20 Beta, I have been running my bridge under NM
> control without
> > too much trauma, but on Tuesday, it stopped working. A few
> other users
> > seemed to have an issue at the same time, and resolved it
> by
Since F20 Beta, I have been running my bridge under NM control without
too much trauma, but on Tuesday, it stopped working. A few other users
seemed to have an issue at the same time, and resolved it by deleting
all NM connections and re-adding them. This is still not working for me.
At the moment
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Marcan
>
> After upgrading NM, same problems.
> Delete br0 and define it again.
Dumb question, I know, but how should I delete the bridge and recreate
i
