Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > interface that I use to connect with internet from fedora.
> > It is an USB wireless connection
regarding USB
is the Oracle_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-7.2.2.vbox-extpack installed ???
currently don't know if needed when the rpmfusion VB is
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 7:47 AM Joe Average sixpac...@online.de wrote:
> > What VM software are you using?
> I seem to recall Virtual Box had some sharp edges when using a
> wireless adapter. Something along the lines of the internet did not
> wor
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> interface that I use to connect with internet from fedora.
> It is an USB wireless connection
> With the VM, the interface offers me
> NAT
> Bridged Adapter
> the other options are not relevant I guess
> With NAT there are no additional option
> The connection seems work
Patrick Dupre wrote:
...
> Do I need to remove
> kmod-VirtualBox-6.16.7-200.fc42.x86_64-7.2.2-1.fc42 (none)
> kmod-VirtualBox-6.16.8-200.fc42.x86_64-7.2.2-1.fc42 (none)
depends on what kernels are installed.
AFAIK kmod's gets de-installed when the the related kernel gets de-Installed
--
Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
...
> > Open firefor with no tabs open, but a blank display screen
> pgrep -f firefox | wc -l
> 11
same finding here with firefox-143.0.1-3.fc43.x86_64 and the previous firefox
version
open one new tab: counter goes up
closing one tab: couner goes down
no slowness not
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
> I am not sure that it is entirely relevant for the list.
> I use oracle VM and Windows 7
> I cannot connect on internet from windows: unidentified connection
is it Vbox Version 7.2.2 ?
if so I had some newtork connection problems too.
It seems Oracle introduced a n
Tim wrote:
...
> >
> > Depending on the method, that would be more wearing on the drive.
> Though I wonder how significant it would be.
NVMe: Samsung 980 PRO
bought: 17.12.2021
initial used in my Desktop until 28.07.2023, now in an second box with less use
secure erased:
März 2024 Samsung Mag
bruce wrote:
> I'm interested to be able to completely "restore" everything if I need
> to. This would include OS, apps, as well as data..
What I do:
my experiences are I'm better off to install new then to restore the hole disk
Advantages:
- removes old cruft collected via several updates
Thanks for input !
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: http
update:
> read some different statements that Xorg GDM logins should be still possible
> under F43
here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/GNOME-49-RC
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@l
Franta Hanzlík wrote:
> But - is there any better "more systematic" solution?
AFAIK the module is only build once: when the new kernel first boots
so my idea would be: just a new reboot
cause the module for the last installed kernel should be now there and should
load
No ?
--
currently I admin my mum's F42 box via anydesk on top of Xorg.
with the upcomming F43 Xorg login's seems to be dead [1], so no anydesk anymore.
I just need solution that I'm able
a) to see (!) her desktop, when she is in trouble and
b) to exchange some small files from time to time
Ideas ?
my cu
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
...
> I am not keen on going to GrapheneOS because I do not want to have a google
> account to get Playstore apps (necessary ones ...
I got a Pixel 8 running GraphenOS with Aurora and F-Droid
fits my needs !
for 8a:
https://grapheneos.org/releases#akita
--
__
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
...
> Our phones use CalyxOS and LineageOS (the first on a Pixel 8a and the second
> on a Pixel 4a5g) with the latter rooted and bootloader unlocked (which is
> what LineageOS requires).
are you aware off this ?
https://calyxos.org/news/2025/08/01/a-letter-to-our-community/
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:32 AM Joe Average sixpac...@online.de wrote:
...
> > It looks like it is a regression. According to Zdenek Pytela at <
yup. I noticed that already
thanks
--
___
users mailing l
Barry Scott wrote:
> >
...
> Can you raise a bug in the Fedora bugtracker for this?
> Barry
yup
done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387134
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-
Joe Average wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:32 AM Joe Average sixpac...@online.de wrote:
> > selinux-policy-42.4-1.fc42
> > bootparameter "autorelabel=1"
> > or
> > sudo touch /.autorelabel;
> > does nothing !
> >
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:32 AM Joe Average sixpac...@online.de wrote:
> > selinux-policy-42.4-1.fc42
> > bootparameter "autorelabel=1"
> > or
> > sudo touch /.autorelabel;
> > does nothing !
> > only me ?
> > do I m
selinux-policy-42.4-1.fc42
bootparameter "autorelabel=1"
or
sudo touch /.autorelabel;
does nothing !
only me ?
do I miss something ?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedorap
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
...
> But is there some way to evaluate the source and see if any changes have
> occurred since the last rsync (or some time) and only trigger rsync
> accordingly?
filtering/investigating the output of rsync's "--dry-run" option ?
--
_
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I just updated my fedora 41 to 42 using dnf. Now everything works find and
> boots but the old selection for fedora 41 is still on the bootloader options.
> How do I get this off? I tried something with grub2-mkconfig and that didn't
> work. I want the fedora 42 option (
21 matches
Mail list logo