On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> No, I do not use such options
Then I don't believe you can get different assembly from the same compiler
same source same options. GCC ought to produce the same output
reproduceably (unless the source uses __DATE__, __TIME__ or __TI
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:21:46PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Why this behavior?
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Why this behavior?
> >
> > Do both versions produce the same results when copied to the other machine?
> The results depends on the machine
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:04:16PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> @@ -112,14 +107,14 @@ double sqrt_rn(double x)
> I'm running fedora 35.
> The line is part of the output from
> git diff -w proof -- > dif.out
> for sqrt_rn.c .
> It seems a random insertion.
> The @@'s and between them are in red,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 03:44:39PM +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Over the last years, there were several issues in the SCP protocol, which
> lead us into discussions if we can get rid of it in upstream [1]. Most of
> the voices there said that they use SCP mostly for simple ad-hoc copy and
> because
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > After sorting the list is:
> > 0 -5.5e-06 3 25 56 88 100
> > -5.5e-06 2 3 25 56 88 100
>
>
> #include
> #include
>
> double values[] = { 88, 56, 100, 0.0, 25, 3, -0.55e-5 };
> double values2 [] = { 88, 56, 100, 2, 25, 3, -0.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 06:12:28PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Actually, this is what I have:
>
> in C
>
> double complex a, b, z
> int lnchf ip
> out = conhyp_ (&a, &b, &z, &lnchf, &ip) ;
The above isn't very close to C, e.g. ; is missing at the end of first line,
, and ; are missing around i
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 11:30:05AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > When trying to install
> >
> > R-mvtnorm
> >
> > I get the following error:
> >
> > -
> > # dnf install R-mvtnorm
> > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'v
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:40:39AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 07/05/18 10:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> > > The MythTV lists have had several reports of problems apparently arising
> > > fro
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> The MythTV lists have had several reports of problems apparently arising
> from new (and improved) vector-validation in gcc8. Is there a temporary
> workaround?
If you don't provide details (links to the reports, etc.), then it is
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Frédéric wrote:
> > 7.3.1 is a version used for 7 branch snapshots in between 7.3 and 7.4
> > releases, which is what we are shipping in Fedora. The version also
> > includes the date when the snapshot has been made.
>
> You mean that all snapshots are ca
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:39:55PM +0100, Frédéric wrote:
> How is it possible that dnf installs gcc 7.3.1 when only 7.3.0 exists
> on gcc.gnu.org?
Read https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/develop.html
"Version Numbering Scheme for GCC 5 and Up" part?
7.3.1 is a version used for 7 branch snapshots in
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like that gcc generates an error (and not a warning),
> when there is a call to a non predeclared function.
In C? -Werror=implicit-function-declaration or -pedantic-errors (if in c99
or later mode, which is the d
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:47:30AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I have a Makefile (gcc) generating a lot of warnings. Hence, it is difficult
> to see the error message.
> How can I have the gcc error message in red?
GCC does this by default if stderr is a terminal (capable of displaying
colors).
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:59AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Not to mention that with library randomization, it was utterly
> and completely useless. It prelinked libs to load at a particular
> address, then the kernel loaded them at another random address,
> thus requiring relocation anyway. The
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:12:14AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:36:13 -0600 "Stephen Berg (Contractor)"
> wrote:
>
> > On 01/06/2014 07:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 01/06/14 21:00, Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
> > >> Trying to get compat-gcc-34-g77 installed for on
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:22:16PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I do man exp10, it appears that this function should be in the math
> library.
You are clearly missing the
#define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */
#include
at the beginning of the
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 05:25:09PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> In Fedora 16, I used to use a call to the function:
> omp_get_thread_num
> which was probably provided by one on the openmotif package.
> I cannot find such a library anywhere now.
You have OpenMP code than, so either compile/link wi
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:06:10AM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Mahdi Foladgar wrote:
> > I have two computer installed FC16 on them. On the First FC16x86-64
> > installed and on the other FC16-i386 installed.
> > Can I compile some program on one and run on
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:08:54PM +, JB wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:41:08AM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory
> > > > which explains why cities are chosen instead of region names and when
> > > > new timezones need to
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:41:08AM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory
> > which explains why cities are chosen instead of region names and when
> > new timezones need to be added (as has Asia/Hebron been recently added).
> > Asia/Jerusale
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:08:16AM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> still has to sit within that. Hebron as a time zone, no idea why
> Fedora has it, nor why the author takes particular exception to it,
> don't care.
That guy clearly should read /usr/share/doc/tzdata-2011n/Theory
which explains why citi
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:59:03PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>
> When I updated today I got this:
>
> Updating : glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
>2/115
> Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-5.x86_64
> /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2011/6/12 Joshua C. :
> > As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get "checking
> > whether the C compiler works... no". I explicitely installed all
> > packages from
> > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:16:29PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Both space and tab sort lexically before digits (which start at 48 for
> "0"). If you're using another whitespace codepoint by accident then it
> will probably come above the digits and thus change the sort result.
That's true only
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:08:36PM -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> I'm trying to compile xen-4.1.1 on f14 and it is failing saying
> "/usr/include/gnu/stubs-32.h" no such file.
>
> yum whatprovides stubs-32.h: glibc-devel (installed but doesn't have
> that file).
>
> Is this a packaging error in gl
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:39:47PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Updating : glibc-2.14-2.x86_64
> 3/106
> Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package glibc-2.14-2.x86_64
> /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade: While trying to execute /sbin/service child
> e
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:04:34PM +0530, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
> On 14 May 2011 12:02, Larry Brower wrote:
> float.h is C Header File why isn't it included when GCC is installed
gcc provides float.h:
rpm -q gcc; rpm -ql gcc | grep float
gcc-4.6.0-6.fc15.x86_64
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linu
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to compile a very simple application on a 64 bit machine
> which may run on a 32 bit machine.
> gcc -m32 ttt.c
>
> gives me an error:
> In file included from /usr/include/features.h:385,
> fro
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:07:35AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I cannot reproduce that:
That's because you forgot to call setlocale (LC_ALL, "");
first. Without that the comparison is done in C locale always.
> #include
> #include
>
> int main () {
> printf("%d\n", wcscasecmp (L"hijkl", L
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:01:20PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Do you say package names change with each language?.
>
> No but the question is "abcde" the same as "ABCDE" except for case does
In most locales "abcde" and "ABCDE" is the same when doing case insensitive
comparison, but e.g. wcscasecm
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:47:18PM +, Neil Bird wrote:
>
>I am seeing sort treat '@' specially; in particular, it wanders around
> the sort order depending upon the rest of the input line. Anyone have an
> explanation? I guess it's something to do with locale, but the input
> strings
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> In F12, I installed gcc-c++, containing /usr/bin/g++ and
> /usr/bin/c++: comparing both, getting the result: these files are
> identical. Why then c++ is not a link to g++? Are there important
> philosophical or historical reasons?
33 matches
Mail list logo
