Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.8.3

tarballs missing => http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 7

Thanks, bumped in Gentoo. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Please file bugs/RFEs at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=389 Ok will do, thanks. -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

at is the final puzzle :-) Regards, -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

a7eefedd8ad42000f look for *PASSWORD_PIPE*.patch There are two options for such leak to take place: either O_CLOEXEC is set or some error after the fork() that could stand between mod_cgid.c and distadm.c. Here I have: apache-2.2.15 (worker MPM) + mod_cgid apr-1.4.2 apr-util-1.3.9 glibc-2.10.1