Hi All,
Fedora 41
setroubleshoot-server-3.3.35-4.fc41.x86_64
Any of you guys having problems getting
/usr/bin/sealert -b
to open?
Any way to get this info from the command line?
Many thanks,
-T
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproje
ToddAndMargo:
>>> Vendor : Fedora Project
>>
>> By chance, does this mean it is not a Google product?
Sam Varshavchik:
> Nope. Every package you get from Fedora's repos will have this. Including
> stuff like Apache, Postgres, etc…
That does seem a bit of a misuse of the field. Clearly
On 3/18/25 7:14 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Is there an RDP server that runs on Fedora and that
has multi-factor authentication? And that runs well.
Many thanks,
-T
Found this. Don't know if it works or not.
Using Authy or Google Authenticator for 2FA with XRDP:
https://gi
On 4/13/25 6:36 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On Android and IOs I like Red Hat's Free OP.
I was referring to
$ dnf info google-authenticator
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Available packages
Name : google-authenticator
Epoch
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 43.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On Android and IOs I like Red Hat's Free OP.
I was referring to
$ dnf info google-authenticator
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Available packages
Name : google-authenticator
Epoch : 0
The fact that it's available in F
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On 4/13/25 4:56 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Vendor : Fedora Project
By chance, does this mean it is not a Google product?
Nope. Every package you get from Fedora's repos will have this. Including
stuff like Apache, Postgres, etc…
pgp47Rubz
On 4/13/25 4:56 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Vendor : Fedora Project
By chance, does this mean it is not a Google product?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedor
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 4:20 PM ToddAndMargo via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
Hi All,
I am not real conformable using Google software.
Anyone know of a substitute for google-authenticator
Many thanks,
-T
On 4/13/25 4:48 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
Hi All,
I am not real conformable using Google software.
Anyone know of a substitute for google-authenticator
Many thanks,
-T
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 4/13/25 6:25 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
*From:* Roger Wells via users
*Sent:* Saturday, 12 April 2025 at 08:35 UTC+10
*To:* Community support for Fedora users
*Cc:* Roger Wells
*Subject:* thunderbird/browser problem
Hi,
System is f41, fully updated.
Desktop is GNOME
PC is Lenovo Thi
*From:* Roger Wells via users
*Sent:* Saturday, 12 April 2025 at 08:35 UTC+10
*To:* Community support for Fedora users
*Cc:* Roger Wells
*Subject:* thunderbird/browser problem
Hi,
System is f41, fully updated.
Desktop is GNOME
PC is Lenovo Thinkpad X280.
After an update a week or two ago
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 20:23:36 +
"Beartooth via users" wrote:
> Here's another Very Dumb Question: where and/or how do I get an
> rpm for the newsreader Pan that dnf can install? Is there a repo that I've
> forgotten to enable?? It runs fine under Fedora 41 Mate on an older
> machine, and
Here's another Very Dumb Question: where and/or how do I get an
rpm for the newsreader Pan that dnf can install? Is there a repo that I've
forgotten to enable?? It runs fine under Fedora 41 Mate on an older
machine, and has done on all the earlier releases; but I've been doing dnf
upgr
El vie, 28 mar 2025 a las 18:27, Will McDonald ()
escribió:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 21:02, Roger Wells via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> On 3/28/25 2:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> > On 03/28/2025 12:15 PM, Roger Wells via users wrote:
>>
> >> Runn
On 4/9/25 1:16 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/9/25 12:06 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/8/25 10:43 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:10 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
dump-0.4-0.57.b47.fc41.x86_64
When restoring file(s) with `restore`, I get a lot
> On 12 Apr 2025, at 13:27, Robert McBroom via users
> wrote:
>
> What is going on?
>
>
You have installed none-fedora kernel modules that use the DKMS system.
It's building and signing those modules for you.
I'm guessing trigger by the building of a new initramfs.
Barry
--
On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 15:32 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You mentioned that you installed the non-graphical system, then added
> the desktop later. That's why I thought the server one didn't let you
> add desktops during install.
I mentioned that. I don't recall if it were a case of blind insta
18 matches
Mail list logo
