Re: Dongle USB

> > On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 21:01 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > I need to login on 192.168.8.1 > > (the manual says 192.168.1.1 !!) > > > > But, it seems that the DNS does not work > > ping 192.168.8.1 does not answer > > while I can connect through the interface http > > If the devic

Re: Dongle USB

Tim: > > If the device is sitting on its original 192.168.1.1 IP and you need > > to get into it to change it to the IP you want (192.168.8.1), then > > change your PCs IP to one in the same range (e.g. 192.168.1.107), log > > into the device, reconfigure it, restart it, then change your PC's IP >

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > I don't actually know what you mean by organisation-sensitive or > > sensitivity level, I can only guess. Jeffrey Walton: > . Yes, I mentioned classifications further below in my email. The organisation-sensitiv

Re: Strange Systemd Messages

On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 07:57 +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > > The message is a bit arbitrary, but checking a network file system from > > the remote is not intended IIRC, so disable the file system check > > option in fstab. Do the checks on the remote system. Patrick O'Callaghan: > Although the messa

Re: rdp server with 2FA?

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:26 PM George N. White III wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Is there an RDP server that runs on Fedora and that > > has multi-factor authentication? And that runs well. > > You should be able to tunnel R

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:21 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as > > "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail > > headers, and conversely, when an email comes

Re: rdp server with 2FA?

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there an RDP server that runs on Fedora and that > has multi-factor authentication? And that runs well. You should be able to tunnel RDP over ssh and configure ssh to use 2-factor authentication:

Re: Dongle USB

On 3/19/25 10:05, Tim via users wrote: Or putting a PC in the middle to manage things. In that case you might be able to use NAT instead. :m -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@li

Re: Evolution Functionality

On 3/19/25 3:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:     I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a mail package.     Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail headers, and conversely, when an email comes in wi

Re: Dongle USB

I am sorry, but I do not understand. There is only one PC with a dongle. The question to get the contraol on the DNS server. Why when I just start the PC, I have Link 9 (enp0s20f0u11) Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 Protocols: +DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS

RE: Strange Systemd Messages

*From:* Patrick O'Callaghan *Sent:* Wednesday, 19 March 2025 at 20:31 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* RE: Strange Systemd Messages On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 07:57 +0100, Marco Moock wrote: That message is for an nfs network device while the same message at the bottom is f

Re: Dongle USB

OK Marco, When the "bad" dongle works "~1 minute" 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute valid_lft for

Re: Dongle USB

OK Marco, When the "bad" dongle works "~1 minute" 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefix

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 12:32:28 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > With the dongle running properly Use that and post ip a resolvectl -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1742383948mu...@cartoonies.org -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.f

Re: Dongle USB

With the "nonworking" dongle, During the first "working" mn or after, I get th" same answer dig google.de @fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 ;; communications error to fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%7#53: timed out ;; communications error to fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%7#53: timed out ;; communicati

Re: Dongle USB

> Am 18.03.2025 um 22:37:49 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > > > ping 172.217.18.99 works > > Good, that means IPv4 internet works. Now test 2a00:1450:4001:830::2003 > > > I tried the DNS 192.168.1.1 which works with the other dongle, but > > not with the new one. > > Show ip r s default

Re: Dongle USB

> > Am 19.03.2025 um 11:59:03 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > > > ;; UDP setup with > > fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482#53(fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482) for > > google.com failed: invalid file. ;; no servers could be reached > > Try > dig google.de @fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 dig google

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 11:59:03 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > ;; UDP setup with > fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482#53(fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482) for > google.com failed: invalid file. ;; no servers could be reached Try dig google.de @fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 -- Gruß Marco Send unsoli

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 11:29:01 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > Another point > dig google.com @fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482 > gives the same with the working and with the nonworking dongle What is the output? -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1742380141mu...@cartoonies.org -- __

Re: Dongle USB

> > > Another point > > dig google.com @fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482 > > gives the same with the working and with the nonworking dongle > > What is the output? ;; UDP setup with fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482#53(fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482) for google.com failed: invalid file. ;; no servers could be re

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 10:17:09 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > > Am 18.03.2025 um 22:37:49 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > > > > > ping 172.217.18.99 works > > > > Good, that means IPv4 internet works. Now test > > 2a00:1450:4001:830::2003 > > > I tried the DNS 192.168.1.1 which wo

Re: Dongle USB

Thank Marco, > > Am 19.03.2025 um 10:19:32 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > > > From fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 icmp_seq=1 Destination > > unreachable: No route From fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 > > icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: No route > > Which device is that?

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 17:27:33 Uhr schrieb Tim via users: > If the device is sitting on its original 192.168.1.1 IP and you need > to get into it to change it to the IP you want (192.168.8.1), then > change your PCs IP to one in the same range (e.g. 192.168.1.107), log > into the device, reconfigure it

Re: Dongle USB

Am 19.03.2025 um 10:19:32 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users: > From fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 icmp_seq=1 Destination > unreachable: No route From fe80::84d1:a9ff:fee7:c482%enp0s20f0u11 > icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: No route Which device is that? Please reboot your system a

Re: Dongle USB

> > On 03/18/2025 02:01 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > But, it seems that the DNS does not work > > ping 192.168.8.1 does not answer > > If you're pinging by IP address, DNS isn't involved. Sure, But something is wrong in the network config. why I cannot ping 192.168.8.1 ? while I can ht

Re: Strange Systemd Messages

On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 07:57 +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > > That message is for an nfs network device while the same message at > > the bottom is for the cifs interface to the same device, but why is > > it saying that they are not a device when they were successfully > > mounted. Having said this th

Re: Strange Systemd Messages

Am 19.03.2025 um 09:17:58 Uhr schrieb Stephen Morris: > On 18/3/25 17:45, Marco Moock wrote: > > Am 18.03.2025 um 09:02:25 Uhr schrieb Stephen Morris: > > > >> [   69.310393] systemd-fstab-generator[1889]: Checking was > >> requested for "192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2", but it is not a > >> device.