Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:25 +0200
francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:59:33 +0300 jarmo wrote:
>
> > Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:10:55 +0200
> > francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> >> I see that rpmfusion provides:
>
> >>akmod-wl-6.30.223.271-51.fc40
> >> Source
On 8/10/24 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 4:23 PM Franta Hanzlík via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:50 -0500
Richard Shaw mailto:hobbes1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Which is interesting because `ss -tapn` shows other
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 4:23 PM Franta Hanzlík via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:50 -0500
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 3:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> > > On 8/10/24 1:07 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > > I'm attempting to run a s
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:50 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 3:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 8/10/24 1:07 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > I'm attempting to run a service on port 443 but no matter what I do,
> > > nmap reports the port is closed. Both systems are Fedora 4
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 3:43 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/10/24 1:07 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm attempting to run a service on port 443 but no matter what I do,
> > nmap reports the port is closed. Both systems are Fedora 40.
> >
> > On the server:
> > # firewall-cmd --add-service=https
> >
On 8/10/24 1:07 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm attempting to run a service on port 443 but no matter what I do,
nmap reports the port is closed. Both systems are Fedora 40.
On the server:
# firewall-cmd --add-service=https
success
# firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
success
# firewall-cmd --relo
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:07:48 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm attempting to run a service on port 443 but no matter what I do, nmap
> reports the port is closed. Both systems are Fedora 40.
>
> On the server:
> # firewall-cmd --add-service=https
> success
> # firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
>
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:07:14 +0100
Will McDonald wrote:
> It doesn't help with the lack of coredump, but does starting Bind in the
> foreground with increased verbosity help in terms of casting light on the
> root problem?
>
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 21:02, Franta Hanzlík via users <
> users@list
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 22:01:41 +0200
Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> On my Fedora 40 x86_64 system named (ISC BIND daemon) crashes at start.
> There is active abrtd, and it after systemd-coredump action create
> some information about crash in /var/spool/abrt/ccpp--mm-dd-*
> directory. I wa
I'm attempting to run a service on port 443 but no matter what I do, nmap
reports the port is closed. Both systems are Fedora 40.
On the server:
# firewall-cmd --add-service=https
success
# firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
success
# firewall-cmd --reload
success
# firewall-cmd --list-services
c
It doesn't help with the lack of coredump, but does starting Bind in the
foreground with increased verbosity help in terms of casting light on the
root problem?
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 21:02, Franta Hanzlík via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On my Fedora 40 x86_64 system named (IS
On my Fedora 40 x86_64 system named (ISC BIND daemon) crashes at start.
There is active abrtd, and it after systemd-coredump action create
some information about crash in /var/spool/abrt/ccpp--mm-dd-*
directory. I wanted to see some details about the crash, so I installed
the debug package (
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:27:05 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I wrote:
> > These files are marked %ghost to prevents them from being
> > removed *if they existed and were modified* prior to commit
> > 4c7acde (Do not remove modified config files, 2023-12-13)¹
> > on the f40 branch of the systemd pac
I wrote:
> These files are marked %ghost to prevents them from being
> removed *if they existed and were modified* prior to commit
> 4c7acde (Do not remove modified config files, 2023-12-13)¹
> on the f40 branch of the systemd package.
>
> ¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/c/4c7acde
An
Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> And I also lived in the fact that it is not enough for the package file
> to be marked as config - for the verification to pass if it is missing.
> I thought they must have some "phantom" attribute or something similar.
> I have to look into it more closely...
Th
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:43:15 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/10/24 11:22 AM, Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> > My actual problem is other: I want somehow debug program (ISC bind
> > daemon) crashes. And I'm trying to figure out why abrt doesn't create
> > a crashdump in /var/spool/abrt/ directo
On 8/10/24 11:22 AM, Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
My actual problem is other: I want somehow debug program (ISC bind
daemon) crashes. And I'm trying to figure out why abrt doesn't create
a crashdump in /var/spool/abrt/ directory after I install the debuginfo
package - although it did before...
My actual problem is other: I want somehow debug program (ISC bind
daemon) crashes. And I'm trying to figure out why abrt doesn't create
a crashdump in /var/spool/abrt/ directory after I install the debuginfo
package - although it did before...
I had an idea that some limits for systemd-coredum
Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:20:14 +0200
francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:25 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> > /usr/share/doc/broadcom-wl/fedora.readme
> > that says that you may have to recompile the wl kmod after editing
> > /etc/akmods/akmod-wl/api
>
> A
Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:25 +0200
francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:59:33 +0300 jarmo wrote:
>
> > Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:10:55 +0200
> > francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> >> I see that rpmfusion provides:
>
> >>akmod-wl-6.30.223.271-51.fc40
> >> Source
Discover the best WiFi access points for seamless connectivity and high-speed
internet in your home or office. Browse our selection of top-rated access
points from leading brands, designed to enhance your wireless network
performance. Whether you need to extend coverage, boost signal strength, o
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:08:25 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/broadcom-wl/fedora.readme
> that says that you may have to recompile the wl kmod after editing
> /etc/akmods/akmod-wl/api
A net search suggest also:
press Fn + F12 (wifi symbol) to turn on your WIFI
Ref:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:59:33 +0300 jarmo wrote:
> Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:10:55 +0200
> francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
>> I see that rpmfusion provides:
>>akmod-wl-6.30.223.271-51.fc40
>> Source : wl-kmod-6.30.223.271-51.fc40.src.rpm
> Yes, I have that akmod-wl same, then I have same
Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:10:55 +0200
francis.montag...@inria.fr kirjoitti:
> I see that rpmfusion provides:
>
>akmod-wl-6.30.223.271-51.fc40
> Source : wl-kmod-6.30.223.271-51.fc40.src.rpm
Yes, I have that akmod-wl same, then I have same kmod-wl version,
rpm packages installed
When I look
Hi
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:43:14 +0300 jarmo wrote:
> Still no success...
Answering I guess: Lost wifi elitebook 840 g1
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/33A3YMIFDEWO7I5O6SDGTVLPC6GSOWX2/
where you said:
When got updated kernel into 6.9.
Still no success...
Anyone know where from ask? I know that it is kmod from
rpmfusion, but surely someon maintains it...?
I have rpmfusion enable and kmod-wl installed, but can't get
wifi working.
I tested with Linx Mint live stick, there was same situation, first
no worky. But there was bcm-kernel
26 matches
Mail list logo
