On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 13:06 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> a ping test is not a browsing test
I did start off with something saying that before the in-depth
commentary bit, but didn't notice I'd lost it.
You need to check with your browser that content filtering is working,
as well as ensuring you
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 13:36 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> $ dig gbis.com
> ...
> ;; Query time: 71 msec
> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
>
>
> Not real helpful. I think I will just ping a
> porn site and see what happens.
You've truncated that far too much for us to tell whet
On 4/12/23 02:24, Petr Menšík wrote:
In general there is no final DNS you can obtain.
I realize that now.
I bust did a ping to a pron site and saw that
Family Friendly OpenDNS blocked it. So I am
happy.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedor
On 3/29/23 02:53, Tim via users wrote:
dig example.com
$ dig gbis.com
...
;; Query time: 71 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
Not real helpful. I think I will just ping a
porn site and see what happens.
$ ping xxx.com
PING xxx.com (146.112.61.106) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes
On 04/12/2023 03:39 AM, Petr Menšík wrote:
How would that work?
That may be so, but at least by using startpage.com you're not letting
them mine your search history as well.
Stop topposting!
Startpage anonomyzes queries before sending them off to Google, and
keeps no logs. All Google k
How would that work?
Instead of that you send startpage.com all your history. If that site
has more trust than common big tech company, it would be your choice.
But it should be clear to you some organization would be always able to
mine (bigger) part of your browsing history. You can make wor
bind and its named.service has no autoconfiguration that I know about.
Someone has to write forwarders {} into /etc/named.conf or its included
file. Whoever did that should know how has he chosen used forwarders. If
that were any tool, it might have easier source file.
In general there is no f
