On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:05:39 -0400
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> Most likely it was trying to remove something from the session (such as a
> mount) that wasn’t responding. The user daemon itself will terminate once
> the session has been terminated.
Not even close. No mounts, no resources used a
On Apr 26, 2022, at 17:58, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:41:34 -0400
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
>> The systemd --user daemon does hang around though, and it is likely it is
>> waiting on terminating some pesky user process that wasn’t terminating
>> properly. It isn’t the bl
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:41:34 -0400
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> The systemd --user daemon does hang around though, and it is likely it is
> waiting on terminating some pesky user process that wasn’t terminating
> properly. It isn’t the blocking process, it is the daemon trying to terminate
> it.
On Apr 25, 2022, at 21:17, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:45:41 -0400
>> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>
>> if you want it to, it will terminate all user processes *for that session*
>> when it logs out
>
> This only recently started working moderately well. If I ever ssh'ed into
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 6:40 AM Thomas Horsley
wrote:
> > so, which is it? wayland or no wayland??
>
> If a ps command shows /usr/libexec/Xorg running, then you are running
> X, not wayland.
>
ah, so i Am a wayland! ;)
*jackc 2218 0.0 0.0 374164 6072 tty2 Ssl+ Apr24 0:00
/usr/l
ah! that makes sense, Thx!
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 9:36 AM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> Wayland desktop sessions run Xwayland, which is an X11 server that
> displays to a wayland display, for compatibility with applications that
> don't natively support wayland.
>
Wayland desktop sessions run Xwayland, which is an X11 server that
displays to a wayland display, for compatibility with applications that
don't natively support wayland.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 05:53:39 +0930
Tim via users wrote:
> I've tried various setting options for setting default devices,
> fallback devices, over the years. But the computer only seems to
> acknowledge them as what to do "now." It never seems to accept that I
> want sound from this device alway
I didn't mount as readonly, but I didn't write to it also. I'm
speculating that the implementation on Fedora and macOS are broken in
the same way so that they can actually read each other's broken output.
I thought that NTFS supported just got merged into the kernel some weeks
before? Anyone k
> so, which is it? wayland or no wayland??
If a ps command shows /usr/libexec/Xorg running, then you are running
X, not wayland.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F
hi list,
i was convinced that i was running wayland on my F34.
i see ... in my env,..
*WAYLAND_DISPLAY=wayland-0*
which_declare=declare -f
XAUTHORITY=/run/user/1000/.mutter-Xwaylandauth.P2V0K1
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=GNOME
XDG_DATA_DIRS=/home/jackc/.local/share/flatpak/exports/share:/var/lib/flatpak
Jonathan Billings writes:
> There are several features in systemd that directly benefit the
> desktop.
Sure, but the ones you mention don't benefit me and people like me. I
can't imagine why I would even notice them on my personal desktop.
The odd man out (and thank you for mentioning enterpr
12 matches
Mail list logo
