On 6/26/21 8:13 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I was abeing sarcastic. I actually like vi and have been using it for
over 30 years. The remark was becasue vi
creates more of a storm than what topping to get on a pizza!
Aha. And here I thought you hated it as much as I do.
On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files.
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating
these two files over into
/var/named/chroot/var/named/sl
On 6/26/21 6:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
# Do not modify this file manually.
If I had a nickle for every time I have ignored
that warning in the past 35 years, I'd be a very,
very wealthy man.
Chuckle !!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproj
On 6/26/21 6:00 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 6/26/21 6:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If you mean how do I make the alteration, I used
the test editor from h*** ("vi").
If you hate it that much, why do you use it? There are others, you
know, such as nano.
I was abeing sarcastic. I actuall
On 27/06/2021 08:53, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/26/21 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 27/06/2021 05:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
My only computer with the issue is also using bridge
networking.
Eyal recommendation to alter nsswitch.conf
# hosts: files myhostname mdns4_minimal
On 6/26/21 6:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If you mean how do I make the alteration, I used
the test editor from h*** ("vi").
If you hate it that much, why do you use it? There are others, you
know, such as nano.
___
users mailing list -- us
On 6/26/21 4:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 26/06/2021 05:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I just posted:
Kernel 5.12.12-300 breaks host resolution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976371
Don't forget to update your BZ to add the knowledge about needing a
bridge network
to reprod
On 6/26/21 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 27/06/2021 05:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
My only computer with the issue is also using bridge
networking.
Eyal recommendation to alter nsswitch.conf
# hosts: files myhostname mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve
[!UNAVAIL=return] dns
h
On 6/26/21 4:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 27/06/2021 07:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/25/21 5:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Since you can take snapshots of VM's. Why not take a snapshot before an upgrade, then upgrade to
the latest kernel and see if you can reproduce the error?
My VM's
On 26/06/2021 05:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I just posted:
Kernel 5.12.12-300 breaks host resolution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976371
Don't forget to update your BZ to add the knowledge about needing a bridge
network
to reproduce the issue.
--
Remind me to ignore c
On 27/06/2021 05:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
My only computer with the issue is also using bridge
networking.
Eyal recommendation to alter nsswitch.conf
# hosts: files myhostname mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve
[!UNAVAIL=return] dns
hosts: files myhostname mdns4_minima
On 27/06/2021 07:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/25/21 5:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Since you can take snapshots of VM's. Why not take a snapshot before an
upgrade, then upgrade to
the latest kernel and see if you can reproduce the error?
My VM's are not configured with bridge networkin
On 6/25/21 5:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Since you can take snapshots of VM's. Why not take a snapshot before an upgrade, then upgrade to
the latest kernel and see if you can reproduce the error?
My VM's are not configured with bridge networking, only
the host
__
On 6/25/21 5:39 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
After a (late May update) I had problems with name resolution and tracked it down to this line on the name server host:
hosts: files myhostname resolve [!UNAVAIL=return] dns
and this fixed it for me
hosts: files myhostname resolve d
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 23:05:30 +0200
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Actually, this is exactly what I did. But this application is not listed.
May be a systemd "user" service. Take a look at
systemctl --user list-unit-files
and see if something like nextcloud is listed (you can disable it
with systemctl -
On 2021-06-26 2:05 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
Actually, this is exactly what I did. But this application is not listed.
Is there anything in "/home/user/.config/autostart/"?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On 6/26/21 10:19 AM, James Szinger wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:33:04 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:20:30 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Kernel 5.12.12-300 breaks host resolution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976371
Very weird that the kernel could br
On 6/26/21 3:05 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Actually, this is exactly what I did. But this application is not listed.
Assuming that the user exists, try using
crontab -u $USERNAME
to see if it's set to be run at boot, and if so, ask the user why.
___
u
Actually, this is exactly what I did. But this application is not listed.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary,
On 2021-06-26 1:55 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
Now, every time that I start the machine, I have:
9729 0.7 3.0 3008916 240952 ? SLsl 20:02 1:12 /usr/bin/nextcloud
--background
How can I prevent this application to run in background?
Run gnome-tweaks and check the Startup Applications s
Now, every time that I start the machine, I have:
9729 0.7 3.0 3008916 240952 ? SLsl 20:02 1:12 /usr/bin/nextcloud
--background
How can I prevent this application to run in background?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On 2021-06-26 1:23 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
With fedora34, I have an application running in background mode under the
name of a user.
Hpw can I control such a behavior?
What do you mean by "control"?
What's happening?
What do you want to happen?
___
Hello,
With fedora34, I have an application running in background mode under the
name of a user.
Hpw can I control such a behavior?
Thanks
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Labora
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:33:04 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:20:30 -0700
> ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>
> > Kernel 5.12.12-300 breaks host resolution
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976371
>
> Very weird that the kernel could break name resolution since t
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 22:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> As an aside, we (the royal we, as in folks in the Fedora
>> community who maintain the website)
>
> (Very very OT)
>
> I think you mean "we" without the qualification. The "Royal we" doesn't
> mean "us" but "
On 26/06/2021 21:13, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
@RobertPC ~]# mount -v -t nfs -o vers=3,proto=udp6
[2600:1702:4860:9dd0::2d]:/mnt/HD/HD_a2/mcstuffy /mnt/mcstuffy
mount.nfs: timeout set for Sat Jun 26 09:10:45 2021
mount.nfs: trying text-based options
'vers=3,proto=udp6,addr=2600:1702:4860:
Upgraded my Fedora 34 this morning..a lot of additions and upgrades
followed by this:
Detected unsafe path transition / → /run during canonicalization of
/run/systemd.
There were about 25 lines like this with different directory names.
Is this something to be concerned about ?
Thanks
On 6/25/21 8:41 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 25/06/2021 11:51, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported
Is this your server?
https://documents.westerndigital.com/content/dam/doc-library/en_gb/assets/public/wd/product/nas/my_cloud/ex2
On Jun 26, 2021, at 07:20, Cătălin George Feștilă
wrote:
>
> How can I install and use dbus-broker on Fedora 34?
If you are logged in and using GNOME, you’re using dbus-broker. It is in the
dnf package “dbus-broker”. It is a drop-in replacement for dbus-daemon, which
has its API described
How can I install and use dbus-broker on Fedora 34?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 22:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> As an aside, we (the royal we, as in folks in the Fedora
> community who maintain the website)
(Very very OT)
I think you mean "we" without the qualification. The "Royal we" doesn't
mean "us" but "me", when used by a person of high office
On 26/06/2021 15:13, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/25/21 11:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
not unavailable
double negative
Yes, that is what [!UNAVAIL=return] means. It is a double negative as that is
what ! does. It checks the
opposite condition of "UNAVAIL"
The valid "status" entries f
On 6/25/21 11:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
not unavailable
double negative
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
33 matches
Mail list logo
