Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

On 4/16/21 8:51 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 11:27 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: given a video file and an png file to output it fails on my system also (and that is with selinux as permissive and as root, so it seems to have many issues and is simply broken in most if not all use

Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 11:27 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > given a video file and an png file to output it fails on my system > also (and that is with selinux as permissive and as root, so it seems > to have many issues and is simply broken in most if not all use > cases), and I don't know that I hav

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 17/04/2021 03:51, Doug H. wrote: Nice. That shows that the "glue" record*is* there after all. The results from that site got me to realize that this will give the IP: dig @b.gtld-servers.net ws.linuxlighthouse.com [snip] ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns3.attdns.com. 172800 IN A

Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

On 4/16/21 10:27 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: That matches what Ed had called out that it was a GL* command. I guess that also tells you why you did not notice the failing.. given a video file and an png file to output it fails on my system also (and that is with selinux as permissive and as root, s

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 17/04/2021 02:12, Jack Craig wrote: * [jackc@ws ~ $ ping -c 3 ws.linuxlighthouse.com PING ws (10.0.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from ws (10.0.0.101): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.083 ms 64 bytes from ws (10.0.0.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.062 ms 64 bytes

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 16/04/2021 17:19, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 16/04/2021 10:35, Jack Craig wrote: > >> First I get my static IP from AT&T actually a block of eight addresses of > >> which only the first do they agree to pass through. > >> > > > > BTW, if you

Re: Canon MF642Cdw works as expected on F32 but fails on F33

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:22, wrote: > I was able to print and scan from Fedora 32 but when I upgraded to Fedora > 33, > cups shows "waiting for printer to become available". > > I am using the driver from Canon: linux-UFRII-drv-v520-usen-05.tar.gz. > > The install.sh that is included looks for

Re: on to letsencrypt

ok, now we are getting somewhere! So of the two servers that are listed the primary one, mine, does not respond the secondary from AT&T is not responsive finally as you'll see below pinging t Internal DNS is being returned as the external DNS number, that's a third thing I need to fix up. S

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 16/04/2021 17:19, Ed Greshko wrote: On 16/04/2021 10:35, Jack Craig wrote: First I get my static IP from AT&T actually a block of eight addresses of which only the first do they agree to pass through. BTW, if you are hosting the DNS server and if your DNS server has the IP address of 108

Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

That matches what Ed had called out that it was a GL* command. I guess that also tells you why you did not notice the failing.. given a video file and an png file to output it fails on my system also (and that is with selinux as permissive and as root, so it seems to have many issues and is simpl

Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

On 4/16/21 5:41 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: It seems to be running /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer" so would be something attempting to create a thumbnail for the file if it is a video. It has an extension of .mkv so it thinks it is a video file or is it something else? It is a video file. the

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Jack Craig wrote: > hi list, > > so my bind config has apparently not worked despite my dig'ing. > > an external config checker says it finds no valid IP' for > linuxlighthouse.com, i am failing http challenge. Others have given good answers, but let me show y

Canon MF642Cdw works as expected on F32 but fails on F33

I was able to print and scan from Fedora 32 but when I upgraded to Fedora 33, cups shows "waiting for printer to become available". I am using the driver from Canon: linux-UFRII-drv-v520-usen-05.tar.gz. The install.sh that is included looks for the following packages: libjpeg-turbo beecrypt beecr

Re: aegisub no more working after update...

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:40 AM François Patte wrote: > I just update my system (fc-32) and aegisub is no more working: I can > open subtitlefiles but not the corresponding video... > > Here the message: > > (aegisub:347417): Gdk-ERROR **: 12:08:25.195: The program 'aegisub' > received an X Window

Re: puzzling SELinux alert.

It seems to be running /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer" so would be something attempting to create a thumbnail for the file if it is a video. It has an extension of .mkv so it thinks it is a video file or is it something else? the command was: /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer -s 128 file:///home

Automount occasionally failing to auto-unmount

I use automount with systemd service units (not /etc/fstab) to mount an external BTRFS filesystem (2 drives configured as RAID-1). There is a timeout of 120 seconds of inactivity after which it should unmount. This works *nearly* all the time, but sometimes it doesn't and I can't figure out why. Th

aegisub no more working after update...

Bonjour, I just update my system (fc-32) and aegisub is no more working: I can open subtitlefiles but not the corresponding video... Here the message: (aegisub:347417): Gdk-ERROR **: 12:08:25.195: The program 'aegisub' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the p

Re: Third level choosers for keyboard keys.

On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 20:12 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/15/21 5:07 PM, AV wrote: > > > > > You need to be using a layout that has keys defined in those > > > levels.  What keys are you trying to access? > > > > On the Logitech keyboard the 5 with % and €. Same for Lenovo > > laptop. On the D

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 16/04/2021 10:35, Jack Craig wrote: First I get my static IP from AT&T actually a block of eight addresses of which only the first do they agree to pass through. BTW, if you are hosting the DNS server and if your DNS server has the IP address of 108.220.213.121 then this could be a proble

Re: on to letsencrypt

Tim: >> The DNS records need to be fixed before all else. They need to be >> held on a public DNS server that propagates them to the other DNS >> servers. Jack Craig: > First I get my static IP from AT&T actually a block of eight > addresses of which only the first do they agree to pass through.