On 2/15/21 8:25 PM, S Bob wrote:
I was using the default port (22). I did a standard install and did not
change anything in the ssh config
Then it's extremely unlikely that it was an selinux issue. As Gordon
said, I don't know of any way to block a ping with selinux.
_
On 2/15/21 7:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 2/15/21 5:58 PM, S Bob wrote:
I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and
everything works
I don't believe there's any mechanism by which SELinux can result in
ping indicating "destination host unreachable."
Can you reproduce
On 2/15/21 9:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:59:15PM -0700, S Bob wrote:
Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from
the start
Which things did you read? These are likely:
1. Out of date
2. Superstition
3. People who need the nvidia driver to wo
I was using the default port (22). I did a standard install and did not
change anything in the ssh config
On 2/15/21 7:13 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Feb 15, 2021, at 20:59, S Bob wrote:
I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything works
Are you running sshd
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:59:15PM -0700, S Bob wrote:
> Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from
> the start
Which things did you read? These are likely:
1. Out of date
2. Superstition
3. People who need the nvidia driver to work (it can't, since it's not
signed.)
On 2/15/21 5:58 PM, S Bob wrote:
I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and
everything works
I don't believe there's any mechanism by which SELinux can result in
ping indicating "destination host unreachable."
Can you reproduce the problem by turning SELinux back on? If
On Feb 15, 2021, at 20:59, S Bob wrote:
> I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything works
Are you running sshd on a port other than 22? What AVCs were generated when
SELinux is in permissive mode?
SELinux should absolutely not block ssh from working in a standard
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:58:29 -0700
S Bob wrote:
> I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything
> works
I've never had selinux screw up ssh, it usually installs all the right
file labels to allow it to work. (Now "rsh" is a different matter).
Of course when I install
Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from the
start
On 2/15/21 6:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:14:10AM -0700, S Bob wrote:
I had to go into the bios and change the following:
- disable secure boot
Did it not boot with secure boot enabled? I
I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything
works
On 2/15/21 6:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/15/21 5:16 PM, S Bob wrote:
It was SELINUX
Can you provide more details?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject
On 2/15/21 5:16 PM, S Bob wrote:
It was SELINUX
Can you provide more details?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:05:42PM -0700, S Bob wrote:
> F32 = the old Fedora 32 laptop (IP = 10.16.0.101)
> F33a is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.195)
> F33b is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.158)
Let's go down a layer -- what happens when you ping each of these f
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:14:10AM -0700, S Bob wrote:
> I had to go into the bios and change the following:
> - disable secure boot
Did it not boot with secure boot enabled? It should!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list --
It was SELINUX
On 2/15/21 6:05 PM, S Bob wrote:
I have a comcast router and an untangle firewall setup, all laptops
are behind the firewall. I also have 2 laptops running Fedora 32, I
can ssh to/from the Fedora 32 laptops without any issues
So, here's my attempts to ssh:
F32 = the old Fe
I have a comcast router and an untangle firewall setup, all laptops are
behind the firewall. I also have 2 laptops running Fedora 32, I can ssh
to/from the Fedora 32 laptops without any issues
So, here's my attempts to ssh:
F32 = the old Fedora 32 laptop (IP = 10.16.0.101)
F33a is one of th
On 2/14/21 7:35 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 12:37 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Maybe there was nothing to gripe about? Oh NO NO NO NO NO,
tell me it isn't so!!!
:-)
And there was me, about to declare that everything had been solved and
now we could relax and put ou
On 16/02/2021 08:09, S Bob wrote:
All;
I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33
On both laptops I have run:
# systemctl start sshd
# systemctl stop firewalld
They are both on the same wifi network
a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces "Destination Hos
On 2/15/21 4:09 PM, S Bob wrote:
I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33
On both laptops I have run:
# systemctl start sshd
# systemctl stop firewalld
They are both on the same wifi network
a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces
"Destination Host Unreacha
S Bob writes:
All;
I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33
On both laptops I have run:
# systemctl start sshd
# systemctl stop firewalld
They are both on the same wifi network
a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces "Destination
Host Unreachable"
All;
I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33
On both laptops I have run:
# systemctl start sshd
# systemctl stop firewalld
They are both on the same wifi network
a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces
"Destination Host Unreachable"
Is there somethi
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 11:14, S Bob wrote:
>
> On 2/14/21 10:44 AM, S Bob wrote:
>
> All;
>
>
> Has anyone installed Fedora on an LG Gram? I bought one a few years back
> and ended up returning it due to issues... Maybe these laptops are better
> supported now?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any adv
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:45 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
>
> So no, there is no appdata or metainfo file in the package, which is
> why it does not appear in Gnome Software. File a bug against rstudio
> if you want the maintainers to do something about that.
>
> I agree with Jerry - file a request w
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 3:18 PM Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
> If I understood the docs page [1] correctly, then the question is
> whether the package installs a .metainfo.xml or .appdata.xml file. I'm
> not completely sure how to find that out, but I don't see one on the
> list of files on this 3rd pa
On 2/15/21 3:23 PM, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
ma, 2021-02-15 kello 15:11 -0700, Joe Zeff kirjoitti:
Use dnf.
Apologies, I was unclear before. The issue is the fact that this
application does not appear in Gnome Software even though, if my
understanding is correct, it should. Me installing the a
ma, 2021-02-15 kello 15:11 -0700, Joe Zeff kirjoitti:
>
>
> Use dnf.
Apologies, I was unclear before. The issue is the fact that this
application does not appear in Gnome Software even though, if my
understanding is correct, it should. Me installing the application with
dnf would, unfortunately,
ma, 2021-02-15 kello 21:25 +, Richard Hughes kirjoitti:
> Does it install an appdata or metainfo file?
>
> Richard
If I understood the docs page [1] correctly, then the question is
whether the package installs a .metainfo.xml or .appdata.xml file. I'm
not completely sure how to find that out
On 2/15/21 2:22 PM, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
Hello!
I noticed that RStudio doesn't show up in Gnome Software's search on
F33 Workstation. My understanding is that graphical applications should
be installable through Gnome Software, but I'm not sure whether filing
a bug would be the right thing to
On 2/15/21 4:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 05:22, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
>> I noticed that RStudio doesn't show up in Gnome Software's search on
>> F33 Workstation. My understanding is that graphical applications should
>> be installable through Gnome Software, but I'm not sure whether f
On 16/02/2021 05:22, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
I noticed that RStudio doesn't show up in Gnome Software's search on
F33 Workstation. My understanding is that graphical applications should
be installable through Gnome Software, but I'm not sure whether filing
a bug would be the right thing to do here
Does it install an appdata or metainfo file?
Richard
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 21:22 Matti Pulkkinen, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I noticed that RStudio doesn't show up in Gnome Software's search on
> F33 Workstation. My understanding is that graphical applications should
> be installable through Gnome Soft
Hello!
I noticed that RStudio doesn't show up in Gnome Software's search on
F33 Workstation. My understanding is that graphical applications should
be installable through Gnome Software, but I'm not sure whether filing
a bug would be the right thing to do here, ot whether there's something
else I
On 2/14/21 10:44 AM, S Bob wrote:
All;
Has anyone installed Fedora on an LG Gram? I bought one a few years
back and ended up returning it due to issues... Maybe these laptops
are better supported now?
Thanks in advance for any advice...
All;
Just a heads up. I couldn't wait so I bou
On 2021-02-15 6:49 a.m., László Pál wrote:
I have a server mainly used for central log collection (syslog-ng collects logs
and put in files). It is quite big, with 5TB partition allocated for logs. I’m
using BTRFS on this partition with on-the-fly compression, so I can save lots
of space witho
Hi,
I have a server mainly used for central log collection (syslog-ng collects logs
and put in files). It is quite big, with 5TB partition allocated for logs. I’m
using BTRFS on this partition with on-the-fly compression, so I can save lots
of space without playing with logrotate and compress.
34 matches
Mail list logo
