On 4/12/20 10:43 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
The dracut errors. Anyways let me try since those bugs occur even if I
am building the official Fedora Workstation Live CD from Kickstart. So
maybe they won't be a problem, optimistically speaking.
I don't remember seeing an email about that to th
The dracut errors. Anyways let me try since those bugs occur even if I am
building the official Fedora Workstation Live CD from Kickstart. So maybe
they won't be a problem, optimistically speaking.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:32 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 8:14 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:51:57 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 6:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> >>> pos
On 4/12/20 6:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to wo
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again).
>
> You need to des
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again).
>
> You need to des
it is not a step back for enterprise servers with 2 or more vendors
ethernet cards.
We were doing a udev rule (by pci-busid) so the right cards were in
the right places, and had (pci-busid) rules for each model so that the
names were always the same. The "new" standard makes what we (and
probably
On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to work again).
You need to describe how you have it configured and what isn't working.
I've been usi
On 4/12/20 10:24 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I'm wondering a couple things. Does all that kf5 stuff, sitting
there almost (?) unused, amount to a security hazard? Does it slow
anything down perceptibly? (I inveterately use too many browsers with too
many tabs.)
No and no. If you're not using
Am 12.04.2020 um 22:49 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:45:00 +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 se
On 4/12/20 8:14 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
Do you know anything about my other bugs ??
What other bugs?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:45:00 +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again)
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:33:50 -0700
Jack Craig wrote:
> further reading of some RH portal docs, i decided my notion was an
> unacceptable step backward in techs stream of forward progress.
I consider the "improvement" a step backwards. Certainly for
a desktop system with one and only one ethernet
a big thanks to those that commented on this thread.
further reading of some RH portal docs, i decided my notion was an
unacceptable step backward in techs stream of forward progress.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/networking_guide/ch-consistent_netw
Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to work again).
[ ... ]
but I am not sure: are these the best ways to use postfix with seli
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to
work again).
However, I don't really want to leave selinux in disabled mode. So, I was
looking around and found the following:
https://l
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:24:28 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> Might I ought to bite the bullet, removing K3B and Konqueror?
I just installed a system to test some things, and even though
I did not (knowingly) include any KDE stuff, I got thousands of
these packages (seemed like that many anyway :-)
I run F31 Mate. When I run dnf upgrade, I often get dozens of kf5
entries (23 today, by my count) -- presumably because I install and
sometimes use K3B or Konqueror; I don't think I ever launch any other KDE
app, at least not knowingly.
In particular, I used to use Konqueror ma
On 2020-04-10 20:53, Jack Craig wrote:
hi all,
on F30, i would like to swap enp4s0 to eth0.
outside the network ifcfg* files, any other place(file) to update?
Having a proper ifcfg*, including the HWADDR MAC address used to be enough
(but be sure you rebuild your initrd since renaming happen
Do you know anything about my other bugs ??
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 6:31 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
> > package list ?
> >
> > How do I chose which is installed first and which
On 4/12/20 6:22 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
After 10 hours of installing and reinstalling in a chroot environment I
have managed to isolate the DNF Group that is causing the problem:
@mate-applications
That was going to be my next suggestion. The bug mentioned it happened
when they were t
On 4/12/20 6:31 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
package list ?
How do I chose which is installed first and which is installed later ?
Or are they installed just in the order they are specified ?
They are installed accordin
Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
package list ?
For example given the package list:
> %packages
> @^workstation-product-environment
> @admin-tools
> @authoring-and-publishing
> @c-development
> @container-management
> @d-development
> @development-tools
> @ed
Guys I have found the damn bug.
I have found the culprit. Not sure why is causing the problem but that's
were you guys can help.
After 10 hours of installing and reinstalling in a chroot environment I
have managed to isolate the DNF Group that is causing the problem:
@mate-applications
Yes Mate
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:45 AM spike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing Fedora 31 with a kickstart file that contains
>
> bootloader --location=mbr #Same when omitting location parameter, mbr is
> default
> zerombr
> clearpart --all
> part /boot/efi --fstype=efi --size=200 --ondisk=sda
> part /
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 11:09, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > There are no tutorials or docs out there laying out how you are suppose
> to do a Kickstart install with NFS.
>
> Whoops, I mean USB not NFS.
>
> Ok, I don't mean to rude or flippant, but I these requests mainly don't
> get answered. I m
On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 20:27 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:12:55 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > "lsusb -t" will show you what ports things are plugged into. The
> > backups might have been working but was it running at USB3 speeds or
> > just USB2? The cable might be perf
To answer the question in the subject: The bootloader is installed on
the /boot/efi filesystem, and referenced by path in NVRAM (See the
"efibootmgr" command).
On 4/7/20 10:44 PM, spike wrote:
I'm installing Fedora 31 with a kickstart file that contains
bootloader --location=mbr #Same when o
28 matches
Mail list logo
