On 12/15/19 10:58 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
Ah, I didn't check to see what the qemu processes were running as, only the
libvirtd process. Good point.
Even processes running as root can be restricted by selinux.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists
On Sunday, December 15, 2019 11:33:13 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/15/19 8:17 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > virt-manager can use your $HOME, without issue. You may run into issues
> > if
> > libvirtd doesn't have permission to enter your home dir though. Let me
> > see
> > what user that
On 12/15/19 8:17 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
virt-manager can use your $HOME, without issue. You may run into issues if
libvirtd doesn't have permission to enter your home dir though. Let me see
what user that's running as.
Oh. It runs as `root`. Yeah, it can access your home directory without
On Sunday, December 15, 2019 8:26:42 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> The PR and the PDF presentation, the three options are:
> 1. Plain dir or subvolume (no encryption)
> 2. Per user homes, i.e. ~/ not /home, encrypted using fscrypt(), right
> now this means a hard requirement on ext4
> 3. Per user ho
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 5:09 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Sunday, December 15, 2019 2:59:10 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi Cole,
> >
> > I realize the primary use case is data sharing. Since the resulting
> > device won't appear as a virtual block device, it couldn't be used as
> > an OS
On Sunday, December 15, 2019 2:59:10 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi Cole,
>
> I realize the primary use case is data sharing. Since the resulting
> device won't appear as a virtual block device, it couldn't be used as
> an OS installation target, at least not in the usual sense. But I
> wonder if
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 1:21 PM Cole Robinson wrote:
>
> On 12/14/19 10:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > I was reading all the reasons virt-fs is the superior way
> > for virtual guests to share filesystems with the host. Then
> > after all the hype I discovered it apparently wasn't in any
> > releas
On 12/15/19 10:11 AM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/13/19 10:50 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 18:45 -0500, Sean Darcy wrote:
FC31 on a laptop. I'd like the have localhost as the first
nameserver. Then the the nameservers supplied by dhcp.
That is:
resolv.conf
127.0.0.1
[whatever dh
On 12/14/19 10:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I was reading all the reasons virt-fs is the superior way
> for virtual guests to share filesystems with the host. Then
> after all the hype I discovered it apparently wasn't in any
> released kernels or tools yet :-).
>
> Is it likely to appear in the fe
On 12/13/19 10:50 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 18:45 -0500, Sean Darcy wrote:
FC31 on a laptop. I'd like the have localhost as the first
nameserver. Then the the nameservers supplied by dhcp.
That is:
resolv.conf
127.0.0.1
[whatever dhcp provides]
So I can't set DNS=none. Th
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 07:21:18 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> What is the command to changer to "run level 3" as the default?
The safest way is with the systemctl "set-default" command,
which will prevent you from making stupid typos and creating
the symlinks incorrectly and breaking your system :-).
On 2019-12-15 07:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-15 20:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
What is the command to changer to "run level 3" as the default?
As you may imagine, there is more than one way to do this.
.
Yes, that is why I asked after looking at my notes and some google
searching.
Thank
Ironic, I just was trying the same thing.
I'm running CentOS 8. The command systemctl enable multi-user.target is
what I tried but it complained that dependencies weren't met. I tried
systemctl disable graphical.target and it appeared to take the command
but running systemctl |grep graphical
On 2019-12-15 20:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> What is the command to changer to "run level 3" as the default?
As you may imagine, there is more than one way to do this.
I tend to do it by replacing a symbolic link in /etc/systemd/system. Like
so
[root@f31k system]# cd /etc/systemd/system
The
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 19:41, George R Goffe via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been seeing the enclosed lines PLUS a lot more (several pages
> worth). Can anyone tell me which package they come from and/or how to
> eliminate them please?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Georg
What is the command to changer to "run level 3" as the default?
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia,
Fedora Linux-31 XFCE
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...
On 2019-12-15 17:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
> [egreshko@meimei init]$ dnf whatprovides /usr/share/lmod/8.1.17/init/profile
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:32 ago on Sun 15 Dec 2019 05:50:56 PM
> CST.
> Lmod-8.1.17-3.fc31.x86_64 : Environmental Modules System in Lua
> Repo : @System
> Matc
On 2019-12-15 15:01, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/14/19 4:38 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> I have no idea why things like blender depend on modules junk.
>
> Strange. This is one of my computers:
> # cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 31 (Thirty One)
> # rpm -q blender
> blender-2.81-2.fc31.x86_64
18 matches
Mail list logo
