Installed Anydesk 5.5.1 Flatpak today on Fc31LxQt all good! :)
https://i.postimg.cc/3w1Xckxh/Screenshot-from-2019-12-13-17-31-41.png
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 2019-12-13 07:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 14:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 12/12/19 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> That's why I suggested posting on the Evo list. The principal devel
>>> hangs out there and is usually very responsive.
>>>
Dario, the
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 14:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/12/19 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > That's why I suggested posting on the Evo list. The principal devel
> > hangs out there and is usually very responsive.
> >
> > > Dario, the best option would be to file a bug in bugzilla on
On 12/12/19 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That's why I suggested posting on the Evo list. The principal devel
hangs out there and is usually very responsive.
Dario, the best option would be to file a bug in bugzilla on evolution
requesting to enable it.
Or upstream at https://gitlab.gno
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 10:07 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/12/19 9:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 18:30 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > > Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 16.03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
> > > scritto:
> > > > You may get better answers by asking on t
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 19:40 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 17.57 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
> scritto:
> > Both Evolution 3.35 and F32 are unreleased software. Looks like
> > you'reusing a testing release, in which case you should ask on the
> > FedoraTest list, not h
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 10.07 -0800, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> Dario, the best option would be to file a bug in bugzilla on
> evolution requesting to enable it.
Thank Samuel, I have fill a bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782987
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedor
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 17.57 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> Both Evolution 3.35 and F32 are unreleased software. Looks like
> you'reusing a testing release, in which case you should ask on the
> FedoraTest list, not here.
Clap! Clap! Clap!
[lesca@dodo tmp]$ grep TNEF evolution-3
On 2019-12-13 00:39, sean darcy wrote:
> On 12/11/19 11:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2019-12-12 12:32, sean darcy wrote:
>>> On 12/11/19 9:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-12 09:08, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:59:04 -0500
> sean darcy wrote:
>
>> /etc/sysco
On 12/12/19 10:07 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/12/19 9:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 18:30 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 16.03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
You may get better answers by asking on the Evolution list.
I'm sorry, (a
On 12/12/19 9:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 18:30 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 16.03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
You may get better answers by asking on the Evolution list.
I'm sorry, (and I could be wrong) but this is a Fedora
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 18:30 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 16.03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
> scritto:
> > You may get better answers by asking on the Evolution list.
>
> I'm sorry, (and I could be wrong) but this is a Fedora question&answer:
>
> From fedora's evol
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 16.03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> You may get better answers by asking on the Evolution list.
I'm sorry, (and I could be wrong) but this is a Fedora question&answer:
>From fedora's evolution.spec file, get from evolution-3.35.2-
1.fc32.src.rpm:
%cmake
On 12/11/19 11:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-12 12:32, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/11/19 9:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-12 09:08, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:59:04 -0500
sean darcy wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/desktop was empty.
Or maybe the problem is that it existed. I hav
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 13:35 +0100, ogio.spam wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm receiving emails from a lot of customers that use Microsoft
> client/server.
>
> Sometime I receive the emails with winmail.dat attached.
> Evolution is unable to display it correctly.
> If I use ktnef to open the attachement I ha
Il giorno gio, 12/12/2019 alle 22.42 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> Probably due to this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521662
But seem this bug is resolved:
> Tomas Hoger 2014-08-05 09:20:04 UTC
>
> Evolution bug and fix:
> https://bugz
On 2019-12-12 20:35, ogio.spam wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm receiving emails from a lot of customers that use Microsoft client/server.
>
> Sometime I receive the emails with winmail.dat attached.
> Evolution is unable to display it correctly.
> If I use ktnef to open the attachement I have other problems
On 12/12/2019 12:06, ja wrote:
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 10:01 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/12/2019 06:33, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
of the rootfs to the disk and
Hi all,
I'm receiving emails from a lot of customers that use Microsoft
client/server.
Sometime I receive the emails with winmail.dat attached.
Evolution is unable to display it correctly.
If I use ktnef to open the attachement I have other problems.
Some of the problems found on ktnef are solved
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 10:01 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 12/12/2019 06:33, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
> >
> > I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
> > of the rootfs to the disk and configuring this
On 12/12/2019 06:33, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
of the rootfs to the disk and configuring this, (this may be related
to my issue, but I have been using the same syst
21 matches
Mail list logo
