Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:06:50 AM MST Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:21 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp --permanent > > [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=20048/udp --permanent > > > Is there a reason wh

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:20:13 AM MST Ed Greshko wrote: > That may not be sufficient depending on the zone an interface is assigned. Correct. See below. firewall-cmd --add-service=nfs --zone=$ZONE firewall-cmd --add-service=nfs --zone=$ZONE --permanent -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity

Re: GNOME Software don’t find Chrome

On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 21:07 +, Fast OS wrote: > I'm talking about gnome software + third party repositories. It shouldn't really matter what front end you use. If it, gnome- software, uses yum or dnf behind the scenes, or it uses something else which uses yum or dnf, then having the google-ch

Re: Bluetooth mouse battery status

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:55:29AM -0400, Chris Bredesen wrote: >Hi list, >I reported this issue on the UPower GitLab issue tracker but I don't >hold much hope it'll get the required visibility. >[1]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/issues/100 >I just had my Satechi M

Re: GNOME Software don’t find Chrome

On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 21:06 +, Fast OS wrote: > after enable third party repo, GS (on f31) does not find any rpm packages, > only flatpak's If by F31 you mean the unreleased test version of Fedora, ask on the Fedora Test list, not here. poc ___ use

Re: GNOME Software don’t find Chrome

I'm talking about gnome software + third party repositories. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/

Re: GNOME Software don’t find Chrome

after enable third party repo, GS (on f31) does not find any rpm packages, only flatpak's ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fe

Bluetooth mouse battery status

Hi list, I reported this issue on the UPower GitLab issue tracker but I don't hold much hope it'll get the required visibility. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/issues/100 I just had my Satechi M1 mouse quit working unceremoniously ... due to a dead battery. All along, GNOME's power

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 6:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > It seems integration has been done with Wifi (see above) but not with wired > connections. On second though, there is no reason why you can't have 2 "connections" tied to the same HW with different zones.  You just need to have only one "active" at any ti

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:45 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/28/19 6:32 PM, Tom H wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 8/28/19 5:44 PM, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > > The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place th

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 8:09 PM, Tom H wrote: > On an nfsv4-only system with its iptables rules flushed. "showmount > ..." doesn't even work locally (because it needs "rpc.mountd"). > > # iptables -nL > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy

Re: SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

On 8/28/19 8:14 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:10 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > On 8/28/19 8:05 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > Turning it on allows user gabx to ssh. So it is a first good news. I am > left now with the inability to loa

Re: SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:10 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/28/19 8:05 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > Turning it on allows user gabx to ssh. So it is a first good news. I am > left now with the inability to load module. > > FWIW, when I run into selinux issue I post on the selinux list. I've > never

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:36 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/28/19 6:06 PM, Tom H wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:21 AM Ed Greshko wrote: >>> [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp --permanent >>> [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=20048/udp --permanent >>

Re: SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

On 8/28/19 8:05 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > Turning it on allows user gabx to ssh. So it is a first good news. I am left > now with the inability to load module. FWIW, when I run into selinux issue I post on the selinux list.  I've never been disappointed.  Not all of the members of that list a

Re: SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:19 PM Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > Until a few days ago, my Fedora 29 Atomic host was working perfectly with > > SELinux enforced. The server is only a few week old with nothing fancy > yet > > set or installed. > > > > I changed recently my user (gabx) context from the def

Re: SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

> Until a few days ago, my Fedora 29 Atomic host was working perfectly with > SELinux enforced. The server is only a few week old with nothing fancy yet > set or installed. > > I changed recently my user (gabx) context from the default unconfined to > systemand ran restorecon. This change may be

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 12:32 +0200, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 8/28/19 5:44 PM, Tom H wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko > > > wrote: > > > > The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on > > > > the NFS serve

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 6:32 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 8/28/19 5:44 PM, Tom H wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko wrote: The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on the NFS server in the "Trusted" firewall zon

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 6:06 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:21 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > >> [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp --permanent >> [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=20048/udp --permanent > Is there a reason why you don't want to enable "111/tcp"

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/28/19 5:44 PM, Tom H wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>> The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on >>> the NFS server in the "Trusted" firewall zone. The setting for >>> that can be

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:21 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp --permanent > [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=20048/udp --permanent Is there a reason why you don't want to enable "111/tcp" and 200048/tcp" as "--add-service=rpc-b

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 5:44 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 8/28/19 5:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: >>> My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 >>> installed and NFS is configured. I think the configuration is >>> good, I followed the instructio

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:52 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/28/19 5:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> >> My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 >> installed and NFS is configured. I think the configuration is >> good, I followed the instructions anyway. >> >> Firewlld appears to

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:46 PM Bob Goodwin wrote: > > My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 > installed and NFS is configured. I think the configuration is good, > I followed the instructions anyway. > > Firewlld appears to be a new stumbling block and I don't know how

SELinux troubleshoot: can't install modules

Until a few days ago, my Fedora 29 Atomic host was working perfectly with SELinux enforced. The server is only a few week old with nothing fancy yet set or installed. I changed recently my user (gabx) context from the default unconfined to systemand ran restorecon. This change may be the root of

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 4:27 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Port 20048 translates to the mountd firewalld service. Oh, right.  Forgot about that service.  I don't have much use for it. -- If simple questions can be answered with a simple google query then why are there so many of them? _

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 4:27 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 2019-08-28 09:20, schrieb Ed Greshko: > > [ ... ] > >> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ showmount -e f30k >> rpc mount export: RPC: Timed out >> >> But then >> >> [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp >> success >> [root@f30-k ~]# firew

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

Am 2019-08-28 09:20, schrieb Ed Greshko: [ ... ] [egreshko@meimei ~]$ showmount -e f30k rpc mount export: RPC: Timed out But then [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp success [root@f30-k ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=111/udp --permanent success Port 111

Re: NFS and Firewalld -

On 8/28/19 2:52 PM, John Harris wrote: > The following two commands, in order, add the rule to your running config, > and > to your permanent firewall config: > > firewall-cmd --add-service=nfs > firewall-cmd --add-service=nfs --permanent That may not be sufficient depending on the zone an inter