On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 15:17 +, Fast OS wrote:
> I think needs a clear step by step documentation to enable and
> install third party repo / apps. I didn???t figure out how to do it in
> GS.
You'll have to get it from Google:
https://www.google.com/chrome/
Click the download button, choose the
On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 11:28 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Yes, /etc/exports is what I have been using. You suggested it should
> be subordinate to something, /home or /home/bobg perhaps. I can't
> find that.
Your exports file is missing the filepath(s) you want to export. You
list the directories t
On Monday, August 26, 2019 8:17:47 AM MST Fast OS wrote:
> I think needs a clear step by step documentation to enable and install third
> party repo / apps. I didn’t figure out how to do it in GS.
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gnome-software-dont-find-chrome/2876
>
> https://bugzilla.
On 8/27/19 6:15 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:58:59 +0800
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> host
>> The host or network to which the export is being shared
> I'd point out that the host names need to be able to
> be found by a gethostbyname() call at the time the NFS
> server starts. It ha
On 26Aug2019 11:28, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 8/26/19 11:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
What have you been editing up until now?
/etc/exports is the file you should be concerned with.
.
Yes, /etc/exports is what I have been using. You suggested it should
be subordinate to something, /home or /home/bob
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:58:59 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> host
> The host or network to which the export is being shared
I'd point out that the host names need to be able to
be found by a gethostbyname() call at the time the NFS
server starts. It has been my experience that the slightest
error in ev
On 8/26/19 11:53 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> i have been using the Fedora document
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Administration_Guide_Draft/NFS in trying to
> set this up. It does not seem to be what I have used in the past but it is
> what I found searching with Google. Next I will replace th
On 8/26/19 10:52 AM, stan via users wrote:
it isn't possible to install a uefi system from a non-uefi boot. The
images default to uefi because that is best for new systems. When I
There is no default in the images themselves. The default is that if a
computer supports UEFI, then it will try
There is no BIOS to enter on Macs. All I can do is select the boot device.
There's also no way to choose legacy boot during the OS installation,
as this failure happens long before the installer runs. Its blowing
up somewhere in the boot loader phase.
Also, performing a legacy (MBR) installatio
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 09:32:22 -0700
Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> OK, i filed a bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745355
>
> All of the work arounds in the Centos bug are for people who have
> already installed the OS, but can no longer boot it. I can't even
> install Fedora. I'd
i have been using the Fedora document
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Administration_Guide_Draft/NFS in trying
to set this up. It does not seem to be what I have used in the past but
it is what I found searching with Google. Next I will replace the NFS
hard drive and start over with a new one,
On 8/26/19 11:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
What have you been editing up until now?
/etc/exports is the file you should be concerned with.
.
Yes, /etc/exports is what I have been using. You suggested it should be
subordinate to something, /home or /home/bobg perhaps. I can't find that.
--
Bob
On 8/26/19 11:18 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/19 10:46 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> You need to specify the directory path to be exported!!
>>
>> /home
>> 192.168.2.0/24(rw,async,no_wdelay,no_root_squash,insecure_locks,sec=sys)
>>
>> Would be an example of a valid entry.
> .
> Well this is wha
On 8/26/19 10:46 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
You need to specify the directory path to be exported!!
/home 192.168.2.0/24(rw,async,no_wdelay,no_root_squash,insecure_locks,sec=sys)
Would be an example of a valid entry.
.
Well this is what I see, dunno which one I need to use, .etc looked like
it t
I think needs a clear step by step documentation to enable and install third
party repo / apps. I didn’t figure out how to do it in GS.
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gnome-software-dont-find-chrome/2876
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742954
On 8/26/19 10:43 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/19 10:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Again
>>
>> What is your /etc/exports file now on the server? If it is not in the
>> proper format you can't expect
>> anything to work properly.
> .
> [root@NFS bobg]# cat /etc/exports
>
On 8/26/19 10:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Again
What is your /etc/exports file now on the server? If it is not in the proper
format you can't expect
anything to work properly.
.
[root@NFS bobg]# cat /etc/exports
# 192.168.2.0/24(rw,no_root_squash)
192.168.2.0/24(rw,async,no_wdelay,no_ro
On 8/26/19 10:01 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/19 6:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Your server isn't running properly. There is no mountd.
> .
> [root@box83 bobg]# showmount -e 192.168.2.128
> clnt_create: RPC: Program not registered
>
> [root@NFS bobg]# systemctl start nfs-mountd
>
> And it s
Am 2019-08-26 16:01, schrieb Bob Goodwin:
On 8/26/19 6:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Your server isn't running properly. There is no mountd.
.
[root@box83 bobg]# showmount -e 192.168.2.128
clnt_create: RPC: Program not registered
[root@NFS bobg]# systemctl start nfs-mountd
And it still shows Dead
On 8/26/19 6:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Your server isn't running properly. There is no mountd.
.
[root@box83 bobg]# showmount -e 192.168.2.128
clnt_create: RPC: Program not registered
[root@NFS bobg]# systemctl start nfs-mountd
And it still shows Dead:
[root@NFS bobg]# systemctl status nfs-
On 8/26/19 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> [root@f30-k etc]# cat exports
> /home/egreshko
> 2001:B030:112F:::/56(rw,async,no_wdelay,no_root_squash,insecure_locks,sec=sys)
FYI, this output of the cat should have shown on one line. I think my email
client is
warping too soon.
--
If simple qu
On 8/26/19 5:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [root@NFS bobg]# cat /etc/exports
>
> 192.168.2.0/24(rw,soft,intr,fg,comment=systemd.automount)
Here is a sample of a good/working exports file on a test nfs server here. I'm
testing
IPv6 only at the moment but the format is identical when using IPv4 addr
On 8/26/19 6:11 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/19 5:49 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> at mean and how do I fix it?
>>
>> First fix the exports file. Then make sure the NFS server runs the required
>> RPC
>> services: portmapper, nfs and mountd. You can check that by
>>
>> rpcinfo -p
>>
>>
On 8/26/19 5:49 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 2019-08-26 11:34, schrieb Bob Goodwin:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> I edited to remove the "/home ". I believe that was a mistype when
>> configuring /etc/exports ...
>>
>> presently it is:
>>
>> [root@NFS bobg]# cat /etc/exports
>>
>> 192.168.2.0/24(rw,soft,
On 8/26/19 5:49 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
at mean and how do I fix it?
First fix the exports file. Then make sure the NFS server runs the
required RPC services: portmapper, nfs and mountd. You can check that by
rpcinfo -p
Alexander
.
Before fixing exports -
[root@NFS bobg]# rpcinfo
Am 2019-08-26 11:34, schrieb Bob Goodwin:
[ ... ]
I edited to remove the "/home ". I believe that was a mistype when
configuring /etc/exports ...
presently it is:
[root@NFS bobg]# cat /etc/exports
192.168.2.0/24(rw,soft,intr,fg,comment=systemd.automount)
No, that's wrong now. Please see
On 8/26/19 12:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 8/26/19 11:36 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 8/25/19 7:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 8/26/19 6:57 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
mount shows:
192.168.2.128:/home on /mnt/testb type nfs4
(rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=524288,wsize=524288,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,
27 matches
Mail list logo
