On 3/30/19 9:35 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/30/19 6:16 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 3/30/19 6:16 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
>>> because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
>>> a stable release and is used only
Done!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_li
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 05:32:22PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 3/29/19 1:51 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I just got my new XPS 13 (the 2019 model) and installed Fedora 29 on it.
> >Everything looks great except that when I work in the shell I experience
> >a freeze of th
On 3/30/19 6:16 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL
Hi,
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> undoubtedly a simple question, but a friend asked me about this
> yesterday, and threw a wrinkle into it. (i'm running on fedora 30
> branched but that should make no difference.)
>
> if i ask for the package dependencies of, say, httpd, among
> everything else,
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
> because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
> a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
> Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). And as such, they only sup
undoubtedly a simple question, but a friend asked me about this
yesterday, and threw a wrinkle into it. (i'm running on fedora 30
branched but that should make no difference.)
if i ask for the package dependencies of, say, httpd, among
everything else, i get the line:
config(httpd) = 2.4.3
Leander Hutton writes:
Did some comparing between the Debian version of usb.h and Fedora. The
usb.h on Debian included sys/param.h and the Fedora version omits this.
/usr/include/usb.h is installed by the libusb 0.1.5, a comparatively old
version
sys/param.h then includes sys/types.h, so
