On 10/1/18 9:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I understood. But you're still only going to arrive at the same destination.
That same destination is a server farm. They may be routing
traffic bases on geographic location or previous visits.
I am guessing.
___
On 10/2/18 12:21 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 10/1/18 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/2/18 9:52 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>>
>>> Any good work arounds? Maybe I am unlucky to get the one
>>> mis-configured server on the server farm? Maybe change my
>>> floating WAN IP?
>>
>> Have you tried a di
On 10/1/18 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/2/18 9:52 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Any good work arounds? Maybe I am unlucky to get the one
mis-configured server on the server farm? Maybe change my
floating WAN IP?
Have you tried a different browser?
Firefox and Brave
Have you cleared your
On 10/2/18 9:52 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>
> Any good work arounds? Maybe I am unlucky to get the one
> mis-configured server on the server farm? Maybe change my
> floating WAN IP?
Have you tried a different browser? Have you cleared your cache?
I doubt changing WAN IP would make a difference.
On 10/1/18 9:39 AM, Tim via users wrote:
ToddAndMargo:
When I press "Submit" on a new bug, I get:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error and was unable to
complete your request.
Error 500
stan:
I don't know what error 500 is, but I think you shoul
On 10/1/18 8:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I think the meaning is fairly clear, but I'm not trying to make an
issue of it. I've explained why I thought the OPs post was out of
place, and people can make up their own minds.
Hi Pat,
I do not doubt either your accuracy or your sincerity.
I j
> ToddAndMargo:
> >> The server encountered an internal error and was unable to
> >> complete your request.
> >> Error 500
> stan:
> > I don't know what error 500 is
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 02:09:12 +0930
Tim via users wrote:
> It's an error within the webserver that's hosting the s
On 9/28/18 4:08 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> You're not using spot pricing, are you?
>>
> No.
>
> I'm becoming more convinced that machines get shutdown when load average >
> #cores for too long, but it seems rather randomly. The reason I'm asking
> here is just in case
ToddAndMargo:
>> When I press "Submit" on a new bug, I get:
>>
>> Internal Server Error
>>
>> The server encountered an internal error and was unable to
>> complete your request.
>> Error 500
stan:
> I don't know what error 500 is, but I think you should try creating
> a new bugzil
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 15:00 +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 01/10/18 11:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 17:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> > > On 9/29/18 12:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > > F29 is not released. The guidelines for the User list state that
On 10/1/18 10:00 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> where the descriptions are very brief - and don't rule out this post
Isn't it odd that more bandwidth and keystrokes are being utilized to argue
about the
"correctness" of the original post than discussing the results of the "test".
Kind of makes you
On 01/10/18 11:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 17:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 9/29/18 12:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
F29 is not released. The guidelines for the User list state that it's
for discussion of the released version of Fedora (currently 28 and 27).
If
francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:32:43 -0500 Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> It seems Tiger-vncserver is broken WRT polkit for any spin other than
>>> gnome.
..
>> Is this documented anywhere, ideally in a bug report?
>
> I don't know.
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 17:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 9/29/18 12:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > F29 is not released. The guidelines for the User list state that it's
> > for discussion of the released version of Fedora (currently 28 and 27).
> > If you have comments on the future ve
On 10/1/18 4:13 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> One thing you should do is to simply create
>> a new user to see if a vanilla user shows
>> the same symptoms.
>>
> New user (also running Mate) does not
> show the pause.
I'm not very familiar with Mate and I don't currently have a Mate VM.
However, it s
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:07:13PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/1/18 2:46 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > My fedora 27 laptop used to login very quickly.
> > Now it gets to a blank screen and pauses there
> > for 1-2 minutes.
> >
> > I don't think the pause is due to anything in my
> > start up scri
On 10/1/18 2:46 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> My fedora 27 laptop used to login very quickly.
> Now it gets to a blank screen and pauses there
> for 1-2 minutes.
>
> I don't think the pause is due to anything in my
> start up scripts ~/.profile and ~/.kshrc. I checked
> this in two ways. First was com
17 matches
Mail list logo
