On 08/23/18 09:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>>
>> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
>
> The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
> well.
> What's wron
On 08/22/2018 04:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing tabl
On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
well. What's wrong with the route command other than it is deprecated
On 08/22/2018 04:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary modules h
On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
> and throws this error (written by me years ago):
>
>
> WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
> more necessary modules have not been detected
>
> In /
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
> a VM, not relevant here):
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
No VPN
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ netstat -r
On 08/22/2018 03:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/22/2018 03:47 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary mo
On 08/22/2018 04:06 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/22/18 18:35, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Of course it is. Port 0 is restricted. What you should FIRST do is:
>>
>> ping 192.168.11.1
>>
>> to see if you can hit the Buffalo device. If you can, then try to browse
>> the device. Use one of the follow
On 08/22/18 18:35, Rick Stevens wrote:
Of course it is. Port 0 is restricted. What you should FIRST do is:
ping 192.168.11.1
to see if you can hit the Buffalo device. If you can, then try to browse
the device. Use one of the following URLs (they are 100% equivalent):
http://192
On 08/22/2018 03:47 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
> and throws this error (written by me years ago):
>
>
> WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
> more necessary modules have not been detected
>
>
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary modules have not been detected
In /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config, you must add ip_nat_ftp
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/21/18 18:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager?
>>
>> If you want a gui, then install nm-connection-editor. That lets you
>> add extra static addresses to an interface or wifi connec
On 08/23/18 05:56, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
>> a VM, not relevant here):
>
> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>
> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my ca
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
0.0.0.0
On 22.08.2018 22:03, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Which looks like it's done what I think I want but the browser still
> does not connect to: http://192.168.11.1:0
>
> "This address is restricted
using tcp port 0 is usually wrong. AFAIK DD-WRT web interface is
listening on default port 80, so just remo
On 08/21/18 18:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager?
If you want a gui, then install nm-connection-editor. That lets you
add extra static addresses to an interface or wifi connection.
For the command line, use "ip addr".
ip addr add
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 15:15 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
> > (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
> > through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have
On 08/20/2018 02:10 AM, Robert Lu wrote:
Have you read
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/53fdbf714a80a2a19b6902122f85550feced7771/Casks/java.rb#L5-L8
?
Just read this. I see the information I needed. Thank you!
What exactly am I looking at?
_
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:15:15 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 16:24:49 + (UTC)
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 13:08:16 +0300, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>>
>> >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:30:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> >>> Does taking out "rhgb" from the boot command line
20 matches
Mail list logo
