On 04/05/2018 11:21 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
The raw mode does not do resizing, but with ntfsclone you can restore and
image to a larger partition. At that point, it will still be the same size as
the
original partition, but then you run the ntfsclone resize option, and it will
than
modi
On 07/04/18 11:34, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/06/2018 05:57 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 07/04/18 10:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/18 07:03, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms
are available
I
On 04/06/2018 05:57 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> On 07/04/18 10:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 04/07/18 07:03, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>>> On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms
are available
I see:
$ dnf li
On 07/04/18 10:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/18 07:03, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms are
available
I see:
$ dnf list '*VirtualBox*'
Last metadata expiration check: 19 days, 23:03:27 ago on
On 04/07/18 07:03, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>> I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms are
>> available
>> I see:
>>
>> $ dnf list '*VirtualBox*'
>> Last metadata expiration check: 19 days, 23:03:27 ago on Thu Mar 15 14:29:34
>
On 04/06/2018 06:03 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>> I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms
>> are available I see:
>>
>> $ dnf list '*VirtualBox*'
>> Last metadata expiration check: 19 days, 23:03:27 ago on Thu Mar 15
>> 14:29:3
On 04/04/18 13:21, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms are
available I see:
$ dnf list '*VirtualBox*'
Last metadata expiration check: 19 days, 23:03:27 ago on Thu Mar 15 14:29:34
2018.
Installed Packages
VirtualBox-5.2.x86_64
On 04/06/2018 01:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
If you've done complicated things, you might also want `--best`. On the
other hand, if you_haven't_, you probably don't need `--allowerasing`
either.
Thank you!
I had to allow raising from some reason when I upgraded
from 26 to 27. Forgot why.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:22:39PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> This worked under 27. Anything different under 28?
> FC 27 -->> FC 28:
> # rpm --rebuilddb
> # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
These steps shouldn't _generally_ be necessary.
> # dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh
Depending on what
Hi All,
This worked under 27. Anything different under 28?
Many thanks,
-T
FC 27 -->> FC 28:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
if anything is too new, do a
# dnf downgrade offender(s)
# dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh
# dnf install python3-dnf-plugin-system-upg
(replying to both Samuel and Tim)
ok. I thank everyone who tried to help.
Once Thunderbird 52.7 (or later) is added to the Fedora repository, and I've
verified the fix to a separate Thunderbird issue, I'll try to communicate with
Thunderbird people about this issue. If they suggest submitting
On 04/06/2018 10:37 AM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: SternData
>
> | Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
> | version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
>
> I'm looking forward to it because some gnucash bugs were caused by
> using an
On 04/06/18 13:02, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 09:37 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> On 04/05/2018 10:54 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>>> I just recently upgraded the F25 on this laptop (Dell Inspiron
>>> 1520) to
>>> F26. It mostly went well, except that I seem to have lost the ability
>>> to
| From: SternData
| Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
| version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
I'm looking forward to it because some gnucash bugs were caused by
using an old version of webkit and 3.0 moves to a newer version.
I trie
On 04/06/2018 09:37 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 10:54 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>> I just recently upgraded the F25 on this laptop (Dell Inspiron
>> 1520) to
>> F26. It mostly went well, except that I seem to have lost the ability
>> to use the vertical scrolling part of my touchpad
On 04/05/2018 10:54 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
I just recently upgraded the F25 on this laptop (Dell Inspiron 1520) to
F26. It mostly went well, except that I seem to have lost the ability
to use the vertical scrolling part of my touchpad. I'm running the MATE
desktop, so the first thing
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> seems to me that some of the current dnf packages related to
> virtualization and containers could be adjusted and cleaned up, but
> i'm not sure against which component one would file a BZ issue
> against.
Not bugzilla, but...
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps
-- Rex
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/18 17:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > related to my earlier query (and i'll have a couple more about
> > package groups and virtualization before i'm done), is there any way
> > to define my own package groups for personal use, other than manually
On 04/06/18 17:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> related to my earlier query (and i'll have a couple more about
> package groups and virtualization before i'm done), is there any way
> to define my own package groups for personal use, other than manually
> hacking the groups.xml file?
>
> i've scan
a couple more dnf/virtualization questions and that should be it.
first, is there any option, when removing a package group with "dnf
group remove", to remove even those packages that were installed
manually? last time i looked (and i believe i just reconfirmed that),
dnf keeps track of which pa
related to my earlier query (and i'll have a couple more about
package groups and virtualization before i'm done), is there any way
to define my own package groups for personal use, other than manually
hacking the groups.xml file?
i've scanned the dnf man page, and i don't see any indication
seems to me that some of the current dnf packages related to
virtualization and containers could be adjusted and cleaned up, but
i'm not sure against which component one would file a BZ issue
against.
first, the Virtualization group:
$ dnf group info virtualization
Last metadata expiration c
22 matches
Mail list logo
