I have been using VirtualBox for a long while. Looking at what rpms are
available I see:
$ dnf list '*VirtualBox*'
Last metadata expiration check: 19 days, 23:03:27 ago on Thu Mar 15 14:29:34
2018.
Installed Packages
VirtualBox-5.2.x86_64 5.2.8_121009_fedora26-1
On 04/03/2018 05:50 PM, home user via users wrote:
I wouldn't want to "hit myself" with Joe's "Big Hammer", whatever that is.
Disabling a process just prevents it from starting on its own. Masking
it also prevents anything else from starting it, which is why I referred
to it as a Big Hammer.
On 04/03/2018 05:40 PM, home user via users wrote:
Here is the result:
-
bash.34[~]: systemctl list-unit-files | grep -i evolution
bash.35[~]:
-
So I get nothing. If you think the un-grepped output will help, I can fpaste
it.
No, I don't use Evolution so I wouldn't know what to look
Since Mozilla first made Lightning built in to Thunderbird, and I learned the
appointments, etc. I put there are stored locally rather than somewhere on the
internet, I've been using that for all reminders, scheduling, etc. So I have
no direct use for what the evolution-data-server is providing
Here is the result:
-
bash.34[~]: systemctl list-unit-files | grep -i evolution
bash.35[~]:
-
So I get nothing. If you think the un-grepped output will help, I can fpaste
it.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On 04/02/2018 11:30 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
The user though, with a real 256G disk doesn't seem to get any compression
of the disk or partitions. Them resulting images are close to the same size as
the disks or partitions??
Does the user have LUKS encrypted partitions? Encrypting the
Hi
I hope there's some savvy TeX user here who can help me to debug this
problem:
https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/180
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-03/msg00707.html
I tried lyluatex using TexLive 2016 in a Debian container and it works
fine.
But for some reas
On 04/02/2018 06:21 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I recently replaced my graphics card (with NVIDIA GT 710).
> A newer nvidia module was installed
> kmod-nvidia-340xx-4.15.7-200 -> kmod-nvidia-390.42-1
> I also enabled VDPAU which was incorrectly installed until now.
>
> I now have a failure of
On 04/03/18 14:08, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I do not know why the i686 is installed but 82 other packages depend on it so
> I
> left it alone.
>
> It may still be the case that the latest gthumb fixed an X API issue?
Well, gthumb on my system doesn't appear to use vdpau.
[egreshko@meimei vdpau
