Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 03:53:30 +0200 Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > ---> > Making an ecrypted file container: > > [ ] > > I got these instructions from somewhere on the internets. Not my > work, IIRC. Just tried and probably m

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread JD
Thanks! Will try it on a temporary dir first. On 03/30/2018 07:53 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 02:41:53 +0200 Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: Interested in how to do it? I got an email off-list to post the instructions. Again: I created the container around ten years ago. Did

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 02:41:53 +0200 Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > Interested in how to do it? I got an email off-list to post the instructions. Again: I created the container around ten years ago. Did it on Debian. But used that approach for years once I created this container. Here we go (Read the

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:22:35 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > I want to move my /home to encryption. One possibility seems to be to use > ecryptfs. I tried creating a test user, and the following: > https://cloud-ninja.org/2014/04/05/fedora-encrypting-your-home-directory/ > (following "easy way" ins

Re: empty messages from fedora users list.

2018-03-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 03/30/2018 02:30 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 23:48 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: I expect that Evolution is not using the same IMAP requests as Thunderbird did. Thunderbird was getting the server to parse the email somewhat and give it the details. Evolution may just be

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Ranjan Maitra
I have used luksipc https://www.johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc/once when I needed to encrypt my directories in response to university policies then adopted, about two years ago. However, I used ext4. I even have a Fedora rpm that I created for it then. Best wishes, Ranjan On Fri, 30 Mar 20

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/30/2018 12:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > I'm running f27 with everything on one drive. /home is 1 btrfs subvolume > and / is another btrfs subvolume. > > I want to move my /home to encryption. One possibility seems to be to use > ecryptfs. I tried creating a test user, and the following:

Re: easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Neal Becker
Neal Becker wrote: > I'm running f27 with everything on one drive. /home is 1 btrfs subvolume > and / is another btrfs subvolume. > > I want to move my /home to encryption. One possibility seems to be to use > ecryptfs. I tried creating a test user, and the following: > https://cloud-ninja.org

easiest way to encrypt existing home dir?

2018-03-30 Thread Neal Becker
I'm running f27 with everything on one drive. /home is 1 btrfs subvolume and / is another btrfs subvolume. I want to move my /home to encryption. One possibility seems to be to use ecryptfs. I tried creating a test user, and the following: https://cloud-ninja.org/2014/04/05/fedora-encrypting-

Re: Node.js 6.14.1, 8.11.1 and 9.10.1 will *not* be built for Fedora or EPEL

2018-03-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:41 AM Robert Van Voorhees wrote: > While on the topic of Node.js versions, do we plan on moving Fedora 28 to > Node 10, since their release dates coincide, or will Node 10 be pushed > until Fedora 29? > > For those not aware, Node 10 is the next LTS, however it's LTS sup

Node.js 6.14.1, 8.11.1 and 9.10.1 will *not* be built for Fedora or EPEL

2018-03-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Just a general notice to anyone using Node.js in Fedora. We're not going to be rebuilding for the releases in the Subject because there's no need. The X.Y.1 releases were created because of a compilation mistake made by the upstream binary release process and contain no additional commits. Since Fe

Re: Can I install gcc-8 from rawhide on F27?

2018-03-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 06:48 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > There's a bug in gcc-7.3.1 that causes a crash on some code I need. Is it > safe to install gcc-8 from rawhide on F27? That would be a question for the Fedora Test list. poc ___ users mailing lis

Can I install gcc-8 from rawhide on F27?

2018-03-30 Thread Neal Becker
There's a bug in gcc-7.3.1 that causes a crash on some code I need. Is it safe to install gcc-8 from rawhide on F27? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: empty messages from fedora users list.

2018-03-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 23:48 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I expect that Evolution is not using the same IMAP requests as > Thunderbird did. Thunderbird was getting the server to parse the email > somewhat and give it the details. Evolution may just be asking the > server to send it the whole thi