> Question: If I were to submit an enhancement request bugzilla on this, would
> it likely get
> done (preferably in time for Fedora 28)?
>
> If yes, then
> Question: Which bugzilla (or other tracking system) should I use (please
> provide url)?
There would be no action taken on any fedora bug
On 10/21/17 23:10, Andy Paterson wrote:
>
> FC25 kernel update that installed 4.13.5-100.fc25.x86_64
>
> Cant mount /boot
>
>
>
> System:ELITEGROUP COMPUTER SYSTEM CO.,LTD. P965T-A/P965T-A, BIOS 6.00 PG
> 08/30/2007
>
> 4 X Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHZ
>
>
>
> Kernel panic
>
>
>
> Ca
On 10/21/2017 08:10 AM, Andy Paterson wrote:
Hi, after a recent package manager based update,
FC25 kernel update that installed 4.13.5-100.fc25.x86_64
Cant mount /boot
Can you explain this further? Was that an error during the update or
you're saying that you can't mount the /boot partition
(replying to Ed, Samuel, and Patrick)
The upgrade phase (step 7) generated a line of output for each package(?) being
upgraded.
The clean-up phase (step 7) generated a line of output for each upgraded
package(?).
The verify phase (step 7) generated a line of output for each upgraded
package(?).
Hi, after a recent package manager based update,
FC25 kernel update that installed 4.13.5-100.fc25.x86_64
*Cant mount /boot*
System:ELITEGROUP COMPUTER SYSTEM CO.,LTD. P965T-A/P965T-A, BIOS 6.00 PG
08/30/2007
4 X Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHZ
*Kernel panic*
Can boot previous kernel :
4
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 21:01 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > The above indicated that the rpm was built, but could not be installed.
> > Most likely due to the dnf command still having the rpm database locked.
>
> Right, so the next reboot will be able to do the install.
You can also just run 'dnf
