Re: End of i686 Support

2017-09-03 Thread Robin Laing
On 03/09/17 09:53, Jeff Backus wrote: Hello Fedora! As you may or may not be aware, there is an active discussion on the development side as to whether or not we continue to support the x86 architecture. There are a lot of exciting things happening within the Fedora community on top of the

Re: End of i686 Support

2017-09-03 Thread Eddie O'Connor
While I myself don't have any x86 hardware, I know many people whom I've introduced to Linux that are running it on their x86 machines. SO yes, this architecture should still be supported, (at least until say...'20?...a nice round figure!) After that? I might make more sense to drop it since most

Re: Discrepancy in f26 iso sizes

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 12:33:17PM -0600, JD wrote: > >The larger file for Workstation is the Live image; for Server it is the > >full DVD with all of the basic server stuff included. The smaller > >images are the network installers. You can see these in the "Other > >Downloads" sections on the rig

Re: Discrepancy in f26 iso sizes

2017-09-03 Thread JD
On 09/03/2017 12:21 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 12:05:11PM -0600, JD wrote: On URL https://getfedora.org/en/server/download/ the iso size is 2.2 GB, and on URL http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/ the iso size is 484 MB The larger file for Work

Re: Discrepancy in f26 iso sizes

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 12:05:11PM -0600, JD wrote: > On URL https://getfedora.org/en/server/download/ > the iso size is 2.2 GB, > and on URL http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/ > the iso size is 484 MB The larger file for Workstation is the Live image; for Server it is

Re: Delta RPMs -

2017-09-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 09/03/2017 12:50 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 08/25/17 14:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> We know they are currently not working for f26. >> >> Long answer: With the addition of alternative arches in f26, we cannot >> do drpms the same way as we used to, because some of the packages are >> under fedora

Discrepancy in f26 iso sizes

2017-09-03 Thread JD
On URL https://getfedora.org/en/server/download/ the iso size is 2.2 GB, and on URL http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/26/Server/x86_64/iso/ the iso size is 484 MB Onn URL https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ the iso size is 1.5 GB, and on URL http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/

Re: Delta RPMs -

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 03:50:45AM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > >Hopefully we will have a patch soon and they will be re-enabled. > Delta RPMs appear to be working once again this morning: Yes -- some people hacked on this during Flock and fixed the problems. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Lea

End of i686 Support

2017-09-03 Thread Jeff Backus
Hello Fedora! As you may or may not be aware, there is an active discussion on the development side as to whether or not we continue to support the x86 architecture. There are a lot of exciting things happening within the Fedora community on top of the amazing and significant effort we put in

Re: VMware player with Fedora 26 (kernel module not loaded)

2017-09-03 Thread Mark C. Allman
On 09/02/2017 09:58 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: > Hi everyone, anyone found workaround on getting VMware player loaded > without problem ? I saw people posted on VMware community board and > the respond are less, so I try my luck posting here. > > $ uname -a > Linux fedora26 4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 #1 SM

Re: Delta RPMs -

2017-09-03 Thread Bob Goodwin
On 08/25/17 14:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We know they are currently not working for f26. Long answer: With the addition of alternative arches in f26, we cannot do drpms the same way as we used to, because some of the packages are under fedora-secondary and some are under fedora. We need a fix for h