On 08/27/2017 08:52 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
So what is suggested is to not just enable updates-testing, but also
enable it only
for ff. And I now need to remember to remove it when the issue is sorted
out.
Is my understanding correct?
Almost. You need to add --enablerepo=updates-testing t
On 08/28/2017 11:52 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> At the risk of prolonging this thread beyond the audience's patience...
>
> So what is suggested is to not just enable updates-testing, but also enable
> it only
> for ff. And I now need to remember to remove it when the issue is sorted out.
> Is my
On 28/08/17 13:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 11:06 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 28/08/17 11:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:56 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
True, but I do build packages at times. Nevertheless, I can always reinstall the
de
On 08/28/2017 11:06 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> On 28/08/17 11:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/28/2017 08:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2017 08:56 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
True, but I do build packages at times. Nevertheless, I can always
reinstall the
dependencies when ne
On 28/08/17 11:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:56 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
True, but I do build packages at times. Nevertheless, I can always reinstall the
dependencies when needed,
so I'll bite now and see how it goes.
Still, it is probably a
On 08/28/2017 08:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/28/2017 08:56 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>> True, but I do build packages at times. Nevertheless, I can always reinstall
>> the
>> dependencies when needed,
>> so I'll bite now and see how it goes.
>>
>> Still, it is probably a good idea to fix the
On 08/28/2017 08:56 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> True, but I do build packages at times. Nevertheless, I can always reinstall
> the
> dependencies when needed,
> so I'll bite now and see how it goes.
>
> Still, it is probably a good idea to fix the root cause...
Oh, it will be fixedprobably
On 28/08/17 10:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:34 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 28/08/17 10:11, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:03 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
A recent update asked to remove firefox (55.0.1-1.fc26), and when I followed
with
an install
I ended with the old version 54.
On 08/28/2017 08:34 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> On 28/08/17 10:11, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/28/2017 08:03 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>>> A recent update asked to remove firefox (55.0.1-1.fc26), and when I
>>> followed with
>>> an install
>>> I ended with the old version 54.0-2.fc26 installed.
>
On 28/08/17 10:11, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:03 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
A recent update asked to remove firefox (55.0.1-1.fc26), and when I followed
with
an install
I ended with the old version 54.0-2.fc26 installed.
Attempting to upgrade to the latest goes nowhere (see below).
I f
On 08/28/2017 08:03 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> A recent update asked to remove firefox (55.0.1-1.fc26), and when I followed
> with
> an install
> I ended with the old version 54.0-2.fc26 installed.
>
> Attempting to upgrade to the latest goes nowhere (see below).
> I found a redhat bugzilla rega
A recent update asked to remove firefox (55.0.1-1.fc26), and when I followed
with an install
I ended with the old version 54.0-2.fc26 installed.
Attempting to upgrade to the latest goes nowhere (see below).
I found a redhat bugzilla regarding an unwise decision to force an unnecessary
dependenc
In my case the system I tried to update is a laptop and I don't have an
external monitor attached.
Paolo
On 08/26/2017 10:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/2017 12:54 PM, jarmo wrote:
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 17:32:40 -0700
Paolo Galtieri kirjoitti:
and here is where things went weird, there was
On 08/26/2017 06:33 PM, Jon Ingason wrote:
> Den 2017-08-26 kl. 02:50, skrev Ed Greshko:
>> On 08/26/2017 08:44 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Has anyone tried running a F26 guest in qemu/kvm with the latest 4.12.8-300
>>> kernel?
>>>
>>> When it comes to GNOME I can only boot to multi-user mode, not g
On 16 August 2017 at 05:48, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> lid being closed. When I run gnome-tweak-tool and indicates the system
> should suspend on lid closed. I have attached the png image of the
> gnome-tweak-tool screen.
GNOME tweak tool isn't designed for MATE.
> Issue 2: Back in the F24 days a
15 matches
Mail list logo
