I had same problem, I did this :
Storage Configuration: custom
click Done
you will see new window where you will see free space left and your
previously installed fedora partitions, all I did was to click on each
partiton and ticked on reformat option on the right side of the window and
then clicke
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 18:29 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:15:06 -0700
> Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else seen this? What's going on?
>
> I haven't seen it that bad, but there is a setting buried
> down in the advanced stuff somewhere that says if chrome
> should
/forcefsck is obsolete
Modern file systems are expected to determine themselves if fsck is
needed. XFS, ext4, btrfs, all can do log replay at mount time and that
fixes the vast majority of problems. On XFS and Btrfs, if log replay
has problems, mount will fail and it's expected the user manually r
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:15:06 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this? What's going on?
I haven't seen it that bad, but there is a setting buried
down in the advanced stuff somewhere that says if chrome
should really exit or if it should hang around in the
background to bog down
Attempting to terminate google chrome by clicking the "X" window decoration
closes sometimes leaves some of chrome's back end in existence. When this
happens, further attempts to start chrome fail and parts of the system lock up
in strange ways. Entering "$ chrome" into a shell locks up the shell
Allegedly, on or about 12 August 2017, Dave Mitchell sent:
> Any ideas how to proceed from here?
> For this install I'm happy to for the current disk contents to be
> completely blown away and for Fedora to partition the whole disk as
> it sees fit.
I also had trouble reusing an old hard drive for
I'm trying to install F26 on an i386 system with a single 119Gb SSD.
It previously had F22 installed, with a straightforward partitioning scheme:
sda1 ext4 500Mb /boot
sda2 LVMencrypted, and containing /, swap, /home
I booted off Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-26-1.5.iso, and in the
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> You could play them in a virtual machine, and record the
> screen :-).
Ah, the analog hole! I could just record it on my smartphone :) Ain't
technology grand!
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
Instead of setup VM, just open swf via browser and record the screen
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> You could play them in a virtual machine, and record the
> screen :-).
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Aug 12, 2017 21:36, "Tom Horsley" wrote:
You could play them in a virtual machine, and record the
screen :-).
Fanciful :-)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
You could play them in a virtual machine, and record the
screen :-).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Allegedly, on or about 6 August 2017, Ahmad Samir sent:
> The root / filesystem isn't force-checked with /forcefsck; you'd have
> to use fsck.mode=force kernel boot parameter. I tested that on a
> clean
> install in a vm. The other filesystems listed in fsck are checked
> AFAICS.
>
> systemd is de
Tim:
>>> Have we got to the stage where the default install options for
>>> Fedora work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
Rick Stevens:
> For many users, LVM is somewhat irrelevant. I use LVM because I often
> end up expanding filesystems by adding PVs to the VGs the LVs are
>
Allegedly, on or about 11 August 2017, Wells, Roger K. sent:
> However within the "Printers" application available from Gnome "All
> Settings" the 4630 "Printer Details" shows the printer address as
> "localhost" (even though Cups shows the correct address) and any
> attempt to print from an app
Allegedly, on or about 12 August 2017, Ted Roche sent:
> I found the following suggestion [1] for converting SWF to MP4 using
> gnash and ffmpeg, but gnash doesn't appear to be available in the
> Fedora repos any more.
If ffmpeg can play/input the SWF by itself, then you should be able to
use it t
i've had luck w/ffmpeg, eg, ...
ffmpeg -i file.swf video.mp4
hth...
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Ultimately, my goal is to post some SWF files to Youtube.
>
> An acquaintance created a series of screen-capture and audio-narration
> video tutorials that produced SWF fil
Ultimately, my goal is to post some SWF files to Youtube.
An acquaintance created a series of screen-capture and audio-narration
video tutorials that produced SWF files, and would now like to post
them to YouTube, which doesn't appear to accept the SWF format.
I found the following suggestion [1]
On 12/08/17 10:27, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I am facing a problem with yumex: I can't update a system nor install
many packages at the same time: an error window opens giving a lot of
error messages, mostly about python...
I can only use yumex to install or update one or two packages
On 08/12/2017 05:27 PM, François Patte wrote:
> I am facing a problem with yumex: I can't update a system nor install
> many packages at the same time: an error window opens giving a lot of
> error messages, mostly about python...
>
> I can only use yumex to install or update one or two packages...
Bonjour,
I am facing a problem with yumex: I can't update a system nor install
many packages at the same time: an error window opens giving a lot of
error messages, mostly about python...
I can only use yumex to install or update one or two packages
Does anyone facing the same problem?
Than
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 08:36 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 11.08.2017, Wells, Roger K. wrote:
>
> > However within the "Printers" application available from Gnome "All
> > Settings" the 4630 "Printer Details" shows the printer address as
> > "localhost" (even though Cups shows the correct addres
21 matches
Mail list logo
