On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
>> .intranet.
>> .internal.
>> .private.
>> .corp.
>> .home.
>> .lan."
>>
>> and the TLD .home. is just in a pre-registration phase ...
>>
>> tell me a TLD I can use instead, and which meets the following 3
>>
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
.intranet.
.internal.
.private.
.corp.
.home.
.lan."
and the TLD .home. is just in a pre-registration phase ...
tell me a TLD I can use instead, and which meets the following 3 criterias:
(1) it will never been used officially
(2) it is not .test., .cor
On Tue, June 6, 2017 06:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 .local is reserved for
> MDNS use and is not supposed to be DNS resolvable.
exact this RFC says in "Appendix G. Private DNS Namespaces"
"We do not recommend use of unregistered top-level
domains at a
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local doma
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
Actually, that*IS* a problem. You should not be doing that. That is
quite likely the source of all your problems. That domain name is
reserved for a specific purpose and putting it in DNS will cause
conflicts.
Sorry, you're telling*BULLSHIT*; the TLD
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local doma
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>> On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
>>> be a problem.
>> I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
>
On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a
ZONE on my DNS - so no
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
on my DNS - so no problem ...
Actually, that *IS* a proble
On 05.06.2017 21:01, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:09 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I did it this way: stored the following to e.g. bugfix.tt
module systemd_vnc_bugfix 1.0.0;
require {
type user_home_t;
type init_t;
class file { open read unlink };
}
#= in
On 06/05/2017 02:09 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 16:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is documentation from F14 and is way out of date.
of course and didn't meet my needs as there must be a user logged on ...
Again, late hour, I should have also mentioned that the AVC messages are
held in /var/
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
on my DNS - so no problem ...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_
On 06/05/2017 11:25 AM, Walter H. wrote:
as this is the first time I'm using Fedora, I noticed the following ...
(a) when open a SSH connection, it tells e.g.
Last login: Mon Jun 5 20:14:37 2017 from 192.168.1.1
all other Linux VMs and/or the Router box show there
Last login: Sat Jun 3 21:41:4
Hello,
as this is the first time I'm using Fedora, I noticed the following ...
(a) when open a SSH connection, it tells e.g.
Last login: Mon Jun 5 20:14:37 2017 from 192.168.1.1
all other Linux VMs and/or the Router box show there
Last login: Sat Jun 3 21:41:45 2017 from winpc.local
(b) when
On 05.06.2017 16:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is documentation from F14 and is way out of date.
of course and didn't meet my needs as there must be a user logged on ...
Again, late hour, I should have also mentioned that the AVC messages are
held in /var/log/audit/audit.log
You can grep on type=
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 09:56:34 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
> > What new nonsense hath systemd wrought?
>
> Is this stuff running in a container of some sort? There have been
> issues with systemd, selinux and containers in the past and CGROUP
> errors often point at container creation/promotion issu
On 06/05/2017 04:35 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Anyone know what this gibberish that shows up in my
> logwatch means?
>
> Dependency failed for Session 10084 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
> Dependency failed for Session 10363 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
> ...
> Dependency failed for User Mana
On 06/05/17 22:40, Walter H. wrote:
> it is running now as expected due to permissive instead of enforcing
OK
As I mentioned in a later post, to get back to enforcing you may need to
run...
ausearch -c 'systemd' --raw | audit2allow -M my-systemd
semodule -X 300 -i my-systemd.pp
twice sinc
On 05.06.2017 16:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client o
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
Sorry It is late in my part of the world and I didn't scroll down
far enough...
> e.g.
> my older mail server shows this when I restart postfix
>
> [root@mail ~]# service postfix restart
> Shutting down postfix: [ OK ]
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
> On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
That being said
how do
Anyone know what this gibberish that shows up in my
logwatch means?
Dependency failed for Session 10084 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
Dependency failed for Session 10363 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
...
Dependency failed for User Manager for UID 25130.: 59 Time(s)
session-10084.scope: J
On 4 June 2017 at 20:45, Dave Johansen wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get the free version of Starcraft up and running? I
> ran into the issue where ClientSdk.dll won't initialize (
> https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42741 ). Any ideas on how I can get
> it working?
> Thanks,
> Dave
Hi,
On 06/05/17 15:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
> You may also want to check to see if you have any errors reported in you
> ~/.vnc directory.
You would also want to check ~/.xsession-errors.
I just restated my VM that is running xrdp and the connection to the
server failed the first time and there were
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
>> FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
>> and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
>>
>> That being said
> how do I this?
Install https:
26 matches
Mail list logo
