Sorry for this late reply, I see that that python-trezor-0.7.8-2.fc25 is stuck
in testing. I do not know why I am not able to push it to stable.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-84c14a7e2c
Can you enable testing and try to see if it works with
python-trezor-0.7.8-2.fc25?
Jon
On 02.03.2017 19:18, renaud.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do have a Fedora 23 kernel because it is the only way to have a functional
> Ethernet interface (unless I build a legacy kernel from scratch on Fedora
> 25).These recent kernels 4.4.x,4.8.x,4.9.x don't recognize my wired network
> card (Toshi
On 03/03/17 00:32, renaud.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> [lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /lib/modules/
> total 8
> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Nov 25 15:18 4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 Feb 28 14:07 4.9.12-200.fc25.x86_64
> [lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /boot/
> total 113596
> 160
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 07:50 PM, renaud.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I run Fedora 25 on my laptop,on a dedicated partition,other OSs on other
>> partitions,and a strange thing happens:
>>
>> On my Fedora 25 /boot/ directory I only have kernels 4
I do have a Fedora 23 kernel because it is the only way to have a functional
Ethernet interface (unless I build a legacy kernel from scratch on Fedora
25).These recent kernels 4.4.x,4.8.x,4.9.x don't recognize my wired network
card (Toshiba Satellite laptop).Anyway the Fedora 23 kernel works wit
Den 2017-03-02 kl. 17:32, skrev renaud.l...@gmail.com:
> [lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /lib/modules/
> total 8
> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Nov 25 15:18 4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 Feb 28 14:07 4.9.12-200.fc25.x86_64
> [lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /boot/
> total 113596
>
[lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /lib/modules/
total 8
4 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Nov 25 15:18 4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
4 drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 Feb 28 14:07 4.9.12-200.fc25.x86_64
[lucaR@localhost ~]$ ls -ls /boot/
total 113596
160 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 160270 Oct 5 2015 config-4.2.3-300
On Monday 27 February 2017 17:50:24 Rick Stevens wrote:
> That would clean it up, yes. What I recommended are settings we use
> when we set up clusters of servers on load balancers using DSR (direct
> server return). The main problem you had is that you had two different
> physical NICs on the same
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, birger monsen wrote:
> The old linux client is java based and still works on rhel 6 at
> least.
>
> 1. mar. 2017 11.42 p.m. skrev "Ed Greshko" :
> On 03/01/17 23:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm going to pry into the latest rpm later today to see what's
>
For your case I would recommend to read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade and article how to repair
broken system here:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2016/12/15/repair-of-broken-system-with-dnf-2-0/ .
And don't worry even if you are unable to start your system, you can try to
fix the probl
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, birger monsen wrote:
> The old linux client is java based and still works on rhel 6 at least.
java-based? i "rpm2cpio"ed the rpm i got from here:
ftp://ftp.attglobal.net/pub/custom/ibm_linux/
and i don't see any java content. i see a lot of ELF 32-bit LSB
executables. do
The old linux client is java based and still works on rhel 6 at least.
1. mar. 2017 11.42 p.m. skrev "Ed Greshko" :
> On 03/01/17 23:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm going to pry into the latest rpm later today to see what's
> > salvageable, but if someone already has a solution, that would
12 matches
Mail list logo
