On 08/13/2016 09:51 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
>>
>> On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
>>> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>>>
>>> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into
On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote:
> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>
> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
> which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
> and I got the following war
On 08/13/16 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK Kindles don't run on Android.
Yes they do, its just a severely limited version of the OS heavily
modified by Amazon to directly support Amazon apps. Amazon has replaced
the default app store with their own, uses the Silk browser, etc.
> poc
>
On 08/13/2016 08:00 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a back
On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
which would have increased the size of th
On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
>
>
> On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
>> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>>
>> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
>> which would have increa
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>
> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
> which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
> and I got the followi
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
and I got the following warning message:
The folder Inbox.Bkup is full,
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 12:52 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> >
> > I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
> > recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
> > in the past).
> >
> > After trying lots of different USB ports
Hi Patrick,
Not sure what exactly you did to make it work.
Please elaborate which of tghe many suggestions you
received, worked.
Cheers,
JD
On 08/13/2016 02:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I guess that it is going to work; I must now be able to make an install.
I am able to run gparted by
Hello,
I guess that it is going to work; I must now be able to make an install.
I am able to run gparted by setting vesa 1280x1024 which is
actually turned to 1920x1080 !!
Then, I was able to run the fc24 fedora installer.
Thank for all the suggestions
===
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:59:07 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I did get a lot of log messages saying "This isn't an MTP device",
> but it never seemed to take the extra step of recognizing it
> as a USB drive till after the reboot.
Actually after doing some googling, there may be something to
this. App
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:52:59 -0600
Greg Woods wrote:
> I have had this issue off and on ever since the introduction of MTP.
I did get a lot of log messages saying "This isn't an MTP device",
but it never seemed to take the extra step of recognizing it
as a USB drive till after the reboot.
--
user
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
> recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
> in the past).
>
> After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
> did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
> to make s
On 08/13/2016 08:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 08/13/2016 11:43 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than ot
On 08/13/2016 11:43 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than other graphics.
Dual graphics (intel+nvid
On 08/13/2016 08:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
in the past).
After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
to make sure everything was t
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than other graphics.
Dual graphics (intel+nvidia) need specific support, Optimus. It'll b
On 08/11/2016 12:59 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
After literally decades of counting on good ole 'dump' for backups, I
find it failing and dumping core this morning, right after dnf upgrade
to the latest version (1:0.4-0.28.b45.fc24.x86_64). Downgrading to
prior version (1:0.4-0.27.b44.fc24.x86_64) fixe
On 08/13/2016 12:22 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/12/2016 05:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
This good info for me - but one needs 2 computers for the vnc, and
a working lan for vnc to work.
The text mode seems terrible because it pretty much will not let user
have a multi boot HD.
I think the developers
I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
in the past).
After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
to make sure everything was totally up to date.
After the reboot, it recogn
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 18:03 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Love it!! First three responses are:
>
> 1. Yes, designed to work that way
> 2. Not recommended
> 3. Better do a fresh install
What's wrong with that? It contains all the answers that different
people want to hear. ;-)
--
All mail
22 matches
Mail list logo
