Re: Samba server set-up -

> > > + > That is the problem! It never occurred to me that selinux was blocking it > in the server, I only tried setting it to permissive in the client. I can > connect and put files on the samba server now. I don't know the re-label > command but I guess I will figure that out tomorrow. > To ch

Re: Can not edit LVM partitions with blivet-gui

Are you booted from live OS and if so what is the image file name? What is the version of blivet-gui? What's the output from: parted u s p pvs vgs lvs Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Can not edit LVM partitions with blivet-gui

I would like to edit partition primarily On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > > > On 10 August 2016 at 21:54, Terry Polzin wrote: > >> All LVM partitions have edit greyed out, mortal user or root doesn't >> matter. >> > > What are you trying to achieve, edit partition, edit

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 08/10/16 18:23, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > + > > This is what I see from the server: > > # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > > [smbBOX48] > comment = Linux Samba Share > path = /smbBOX48 > public = yes > writeable = yes > security = user > ;map to guest = Bad User > > You confi

Re: Samba server set-up -

> + > > This is what I see from the server: > > # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > > [smbBOX48] > comment = Linux Samba Share > path = /smbBOX48 > public = yes > writeable = yes > security = user > ;map to guest = Bad User > > You configuration is a bit different to what I use in

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 08/10/16 17:53, Earl A Ramirez wrote: On 10 August 2016 at 23:47, Bob Goodwin > wrote: On 08/10/16 17:38, Earl A Ramirez wrote: ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 + >From client: [root@Box10 ~]# ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 drwxrw-rw-+ 3 bobg scanner sy

Re: Security vulnerability in TCP of linux, patches available, how soon in Fedora?

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:06:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This was fixed in july in Fedora kernels: > > * Tue Jul 12 2016 Josh Boyer - 4.6.4-201 > - CVE-2016-5389 CVE-2016-5969 tcp challenge ack info leak (rhbz > 1354708 1355615) Thanks Kevin, that's what I wanted to know. Phew! Sigh of relie

Re: Can not edit LVM partitions with blivet-gui

On 10 August 2016 at 21:54, Terry Polzin wrote: > All LVM partitions have edit greyed out, mortal user or root doesn't > matter. > What are you trying to achieve, edit partition, edit filesystem, edit mount options, what exactly are you doing so that we can try and reproduce it? -- Kind Regar

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 10 August 2016 at 23:47, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 08/10/16 17:38, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > >> ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 >> > + > From client: > [root@Box10 ~]# ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 > drwxrw-rw-+ 3 bobg scanner system_u:object_r:cifs_t:s0 0 Aug 10 14:29 > /mnt/box48 > > > From server: > [root@Box48 /]#

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 08/10/16 17:38, Earl A Ramirez wrote: ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 + From client: [root@Box10 ~]# ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 drwxrw-rw-+ 3 bobg scanner system_u:object_r:cifs_t:s0 0 Aug 10 14:29 /mnt/box48 From server: [root@Box48 /]# ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 ls: cannot access '/mnt/box48': No such file or dir

Re: Samba server set-up -

> >> What is the output from ls -ldZ /mnt >> >> + > > [root@Box48 /]# ls -ldZ /mnt > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root system_u:object_r:mnt_t:s0 4096 Aug 10 13:40 /mnt > > I meant ls -ldZ /mnt/box48 I saw this a few times and it was related to SELinux as it was missing the label, which sort of explain why

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 08/10/16 17:02, Earl A Ramirez wrote: On 10 Aug 2016 21:50, "Bob Goodwin" > wrote: > > On 08/07/16 16:11, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> >> I've been trying for two days to get a samba server working. I think I have the configuration correct in comparing it with what I

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 10 Aug 2016 21:50, "Bob Goodwin" wrote: > > On 08/07/16 16:11, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> >> I've been trying for two days to get a samba server working. I think I have the configuration correct in comparing it with what I did before which had been working. This is a new Fedora 24 installation, upda

Re: Security vulnerability in TCP of linux, patches available, how soon in Fedora?

On 08/10/2016 03:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:50:37 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: On 08/09/2016 10:44 PM, Rick Walker wrote: I'm very skeptical. Take a look at the pdf linked in the first message. The challenge ack limit was intended to improve security, but created a si

Can not edit LVM partitions with blivet-gui

All LVM partitions have edit greyed out, mortal user or root doesn't matter. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org

Re: Samba server set-up -

On 08/07/16 16:11, Bob Goodwin wrote: I've been trying for two days to get a samba server working. I think I have the configuration correct in comparing it with what I did before which had been working. This is a new Fedora 24 installation, updated. + Ok, now I can mount the server, mount show

Re: Security vulnerability in TCP of linux, patches available, how soon in Fedora?

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:50:37 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/09/2016 10:44 PM, Rick Walker wrote: > > I'm very skeptical. > > Take a look at the pdf linked in the first message. The challenge > ack limit was intended to improve security, but created a > side-channel attack that could allo

Re: Security vulnerability in TCP of linux, patches available, how soon in Fedora?

On 08/09/2016 10:44 PM, Rick Walker wrote: I'm very skeptical. Take a look at the pdf linked in the first message. The challenge ack limit was intended to improve security, but created a side-channel attack that could allow someone who doesn't control the communication path to reset conne

F24: in-built camera not recognized on Dell Latitude E6400

Hi, I am not able to get my old Dell Latitude E6400 get its camera recognized on F24. I have used this ages ago and I don't recall this being a problem (with a much earlier version of Fedora). Any suggestions as to what I should be looking at? Camorama says: Could not connect to video device

Re: Security vulnerability in TCP of linux, patches available, how soon in Fedora?

On 10 August 2016 at 06:44, Rick Walker wrote: > >> 1. Open /etc/sysctl.conf, append a command >> "/net.ipv4/tcp_challenge_ack_limit = 9". > > I'm very skeptical. The default on my stock machine is 100. You can check > your own with: > > sysctl -A | grep tcp | grep limit > > In the