Re: Bitmap font resizer (or: good classic-style terminal font)?

Increasing font size in preferences doesn't work for what you want? It also gives some nice options of fonts to try. I may be erroneously assuming a gui. Fred Roller On Apr 20, 2016 9:40 PM, "Chris Adams" wrote: > I guess I've been using xterm forever, and I'm really used to the > classic X "fi

Bitmap font resizer (or: good classic-style terminal font)?

I guess I've been using xterm forever, and I'm really used to the classic X "fixed" font (aka "6x13"). However, as display DPI has gone up, it has gotten a little harder to see. I got a new notebook today with a 14" 2560x1440 display (210 DPI), and "fixed" isn't going to work any more. Is there

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 02:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: Related. -j isn't the same as mkfs.ext3 I guess, at least not with such old progs. tl;dr, best to use mkfs.ext3, mkfs.ext4, etc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594777 Interesting. I've usually just used mke2fs -j. From the man page: -j

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Chris Murphy >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> But then the eftools complain and don’t work properly,

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > >>> >>> But then the eftools complain and don’t work properly, example >>> >>> [root@raos_apps01 ~]# mke2fs -n /dev/sdb1 >>> mk

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> >> But then the eftools complain and don’t work properly, example >> >> [root@raos_apps01 ~]# mke2fs -n /dev/sdb1 >> mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) > > There's the problem. Why are you us

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Murphy > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On >> Behalf Of Chri

Re: Cant read superblocks

> On Apr 20, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 04/20/2016 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm assuming he'll continue to use -n because if he doesn't it's toast. > Oh, good point, I missed that! :-) Yes, thank you ! === Please consider the environ

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I'm assuming he'll continue to use -n because if he doesn't it's toast. Oh, good point, I missed that! :-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/us

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/20/2016 12:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> [root@raos_apps01 ~]# mke2fs -n /dev/sdb1 >>> mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) >>> mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 12:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: [root@raos_apps01 ~]# mke2fs -n /dev/sdb1 mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2**31-1 blocks (8TB using a blocksize of 4k) are currently supported.

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > > > [root@raos_apps01 ~]# mke2fs -n /dev/sdb1 > mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) > mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2**31-1 blocks > (8TB using a blocksize of 4k) are currently supported. Sounds like it's creating ext2 by defa

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 11:38 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: [root@raos_apps01 ~]# cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 8 0 976224256 sda 8 1 104391 sda1 8 2 976117432 sda2 816 14643363840 sdb 817 14643362847 sdb1 832 42971168768 sdc 833

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On > Behalf Of Chris Murphy > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael w

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Murphy > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > >>> Because I believe that I built the 15Tb filesystem for ext3 using 8K >>> blocks

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > >> Because I believe that I built the 15Tb filesystem for ext3 using 8K blocks >> when I s

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > >> Because I believe that I built the 15Tb filesystem for ext3 using 8K blocks >> when I set this up several years back > > What platform was it created on and has been used on unti

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> Because I believe that I built the 15Tb filesystem for ext3 using 8K >> blocks when I set this up several years back > What platform was it crea

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > Because I believe that I built the 15Tb filesystem for ext3 using 8K blocks > when I set this up several years back What platform was it created on and has been used on until now? At least XFS, ext4, and Btrfs right now can't mount fil

Re: dnf - deprecated update cmd

On 20 April 2016 at 17:37, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 04/20/2016 09:03 AM, Tom H wrote: > >> > >> "apt-get update" is the same as "yum|dnf makecache" but with yum|dnf > >> you have to remember to use "yum|dnf -C update" (given dnf's new > >> cache b

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: ch...@colorremedies.com [mailto:ch...@colorremedies.com] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > I have a Dell PowerEdge R910 with a PERC 700 controller that has a virtual > drive configured as a RAID 5 with 15 disks in it. We're running CentOS

Re: Cant read superblocks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > I have a Dell PowerEdge R910 with a PERC 700 controller that has a virtual > drive configured as a RAID 5 with 15 disks in it. We're running CentOS 5.10 > at the moment, and I created a 15Tb ext3 filesystem on that RAID group (set > this

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: Gordon Messmer [mailto:gordon.mess...@gmail.com] On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > I received the following error: > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, # dd if=/dev/sdb1 bs=1k count=1 skip=1 | od -h ... 060 a851 570e 0044 ef53 0001 0001

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: Samuel Sieb [mailto:sam...@sieb.net] On 04/20/2016 10:07 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > From: Rick Stevens > > On 04/20/2016 09:32 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> I think the concept here is that you ADDED a controller to the system. >> This can cause the system to enumerate the bus differently

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I received the following error: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, # dd if=/dev/sdb1 bs=1k count=1 skip=1 | od -h ... 060 a851 570e 0044 ef53 0001 0001 ... "ef53" is a signature for ext3 filesystems. Do

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 10:07 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: From: Rick Stevens On 04/20/2016 09:32 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I think the concept here is that you ADDED a controller to the system. This can cause the system to enumerate the bus differently so your old, existing array may now be /dev/sda or

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: Rick Stevens On 04/20/2016 09:32 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> From: Gordon Messmer >> >>> On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I had the opportunity to add another PERC H810 controller along with a PowerVault MD1200 to add more space ... when the server came up and I >

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 09:32 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: From: Gordon Messmer On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I had the opportunity to add another PERC H810 controller along with a PowerVault MD1200 to add more space ... when the server came up and I tried to mount it, I received the fo

Re: F23 dracut can't find disk

On 04/19/2016 06:07 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: I wrote: I have five machines which were fresh-installed with F23 back in February and all have been booted successfully a few times since. Today, booting of all of them fails in exactly the same way: dracut says it can't find the disk filesystems. The

Re: dnf - deprecated update cmd

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/20/2016 09:03 AM, Tom H wrote: >> >> "apt-get update" is the same as "yum|dnf makecache" but with yum|dnf >> you have to remember to use "yum|dnf -C update" (given dnf's new >> cache behavior, it seems to work from cache without "-C"). >

RE: Cant read superblocks

From: Gordon Messmer > On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: >> I had the opportunity to add another PERC H810 controller along with a >> PowerVault MD1200 to add more space ... when the server came up and I tried >> to mount it, I received the following error: >> >> mount: wrong fs typ

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

Hi, I had success specify the full path of the file... Thank you very much for the help Angelo On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/20/2016 08:37 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > >> Hi Ed, >> >> I have Fedora 21 . >> >> _I think that, with your help, now is all Ok . _ >>

Re: Cant read superblocks

On 04/20/2016 05:33 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I had the opportunity to add another PERC H810 controller along with a PowerVault MD1200 to add more space ... when the server came up and I tried to mount it, I received the following error: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /de

Re: dnf - deprecated update cmd

On 04/20/2016 09:03 AM, Tom H wrote: "apt-get update" is the same as "yum|dnf makecache" but with yum|dnf you have to remember to use "yum|dnf -C update" (given dnf's new cache behavior, it seems to work from cache without "-C"). The -C option to both yum and dnf means to only use the cache. I

Re: dnf - deprecated update cmd

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 04/19/2016 01:47 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 19 Apr 2016 19:58, "Rick Stevens" > > wrote: >>> On 04/19/2016 10:35 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 04/19/2016 01:49 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > What term

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

On 04/20/2016 08:37 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: Hi Ed, I have Fedora 21 . _I think that, with your help, now is all Ok . _ You guided me to have the file with the key, that I need, inside my computer... What I need now is only to _install this KEY on the computer _...! That means that the f

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

Hi Ed, I have Fedora 21 . *I think that, with your help, now is all Ok . * You guided me to have the file with the key, that I need, inside my computer... What I need now is only to *install this KEY on the computer *...! That means that the file rpmfusion-free-release-21.noarch.rpm, that now

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

On 04/20/16 22:02, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > rpm -qa | grep rpmfusion give me, now : > rpmfusion-free-release-22-1.noarch > rpmfusion-nonfree-release-21-1.noarch > > (how as was to think) > > And, after I downloaded the free version, I have on the compter the file > rpmfusion-free-release-21.no

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

OK! rpm -qa | grep rpmfusion give me, now : rpmfusion-free-release-22-1.noarch rpmfusion-nonfree-release-21-1.noarch (how as was to think) And, after I downloaded the free version, I have on the compter the file rpmfusion-free-release-21.noarch.rpm. *Now* it is right to install this downoaded

Re: Libvirt networking question (SOLVED)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/19/2016 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking, >> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant >> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back to N

Re: Libvirt networking question (SOLVED)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote: >> >> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking, >> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant >> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back t

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

On 04/20/16 18:35, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > OK! The command worked, but installed only the not free repository...: > == > Package Arch Version > Repository

Cant read superblocks

I have a Dell PowerEdge R910 with a PERC 700 controller that has a virtual drive configured as a RAID 5 with 15 disks in it. We're running CentOS 5.10 at the moment, and I created a 15Tb ext3 filesystem on that RAID group (set this up a few years back) that has been running fine up until yesterd

Re: How to fix : GPG key retrivial failed

Hi Ed, OK! The command worked, but installed only the not free repository...: == Package Arch Version Repository Size Installing: rpmfusion-nonfree-re