On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble with
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cebdf579ca
>
> I updated this morning, and with that update applied, when I lock the
> session and my monit
It's also worth installing and running powertop -c which can be done
either on battery power or not, and it'll set some better power states
on various things. It may not make the fan run less or CPU less warm,
but it'll still use less power. There are a bunch of powertop guides
floating about.
Ch
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:45:23AM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 07:40 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> >Thank you for all the comments.
> >
> >What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that
> >it's the files in
> >
> >/var/cache/yum/x86_64/22
> >
> >that are being upd
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:22:02PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> But I was wondering: is the license appropriate enough to bring to
> Fedora? The license is Mozilla Public License Version 2.0 and is
> attached.
MPL v2.0 is definitely on our list of "Fedora good licenses":
https://fedoraproject.org
On 04/13/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:51:31 -0400
Richard Heck wrote:
Any suggestions?
Yep. The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure,
but none of the errors messages you get give you a hint
that dsa keys no longer work.
You can change a lot of obscure pa
Hi,
I recently became aware of a new browser called "Brave" which ditches ads
(www.brave.com) or pays you to watch them and have been using it for a couple
of days now. It is certainly faster than Firefox which is a great browser but
freezes quite a bit.
But I was wondering: is the license app
On 04/13/2016 12:24 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
If you're using NAT, then all the connections to the Samba server will
appear to come from the same IP, which may confuse things.
I think the root of the problem is that SMB creates a browse master for
each subnet. Since the Samba server and the Windo
On 04/13/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure
Do you mean "the security experts who maintain OpenSSH and OpenBSD?"
http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.0
But, yeah, the release notes are light on details.
I recommend this document to SSH users:
The problem turned out to be remote logging to a host that was down
for a while. After disabling the remote logging to a host that was no
longer available, logging no longer blocked.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a fedora23 mail server that's been working for quite
Is anyone else having trouble with
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cebdf579ca
I updated this morning, and with that update applied, when I lock the
session and my monitors shut off, the system takes a very long time
(which varies,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote
>
> Thwarted. The Windows 10 Media Creation Tool, from Microsoft, does not
> use an already downloaded ISO. It downloads a new copy, apparently
> each time you want to create a stick. There are 3rd party USB creation
> tools but I have no real in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:51:31 -0400
Richard Heck wrote:
> Any suggestions?
Yep. The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure,
but none of the errors messages you get give you a hint
that dsa keys no longer work.
You can change a lot of obscure parameters in /etc/sshd.config
(and maybe /etc/
On 04/13/16 15:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
The iInterface line shows "0" That
does not look encouraging ...
That's not a good sign. Shotwell must
just do PTP on it despite that. Oh
well, I guess that's it then.
--
.
Well I guess I can live with what I know
about it then. Thanks much for the
On 04/13/2016 12:32 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
lsusb -v -d 04b0:0320 produces the following lines:
bInterfaceSubClass 1 Still Image Capture
bInterfaceProtocol 1 Picture Transfer Protocol (PIMA 15470)
iInterface 0
The iInterface line shows "0" That does not look encouraging ..
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600
>> Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the
>>> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM.
>>
>> Almost c
I've googled around for this and found some similar complaints, but none
of the solutions mentioned in these threads works for me. So I'm asking
here.
With F22 on the same machine, my normal routine would be:
> ssh-add
Enter passphrase for /home/me/.ssh/id_dsa:
Identity added: /home/me/.ssh/id_d
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the
>> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM.
>
> Almost certainly depends on the kind of networking the VM
> uses. I alw
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>> I still can't see the
>> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Should this work?
>
>
> What kind of networking are you using on the VM? If you're using NAT, then
> all the connection
On 04/12/16 01:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 04/11/2016 08:43 AM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
I just installed simple-mtpfs and gat
the following:
[root@Box10 bobg]# simple-mtpfs -l
No raw devices found.
[root@Box10 bobg]# simple-mtpfs -l
No raw devices found.
You said it is a Nikon S3100? I just
checke
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the
> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM.
Almost certainly depends on the kind of networking the VM
uses. I always setup all my VMs using a bridge, which makes
them all look li
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
> I still can't see the
> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Should this work?
>
What kind of networking are you using on the VM? If you're using NAT, then
all the connections to the Samba server will appear to come from the same
IP, which m
Hi,
I have a fedora23 mail server that's been working for quite some time.
I have rsyslog installed and configured to log mail to
/var/log/maillog. It's never had a problem, but for some reason
yesterday it started intermittently stop logging for about three
minutes, then catch up with the three m
computer1 = Fedora 23 Server, running samba-4.3.6
computer2 =Fedora 23 Workstation, virt-manager VM Windows 10
computer2 happens to be a Mac, and whether Fedora or OS X I can share
files just fine from the Samba server. UI wise both Fedora and OS X
are about as brain dead simple as it gets, which
On 04/13/2016 12:09 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/13/16 14:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you try those terminal commands I suggested in an earlier email?
The results from those would be interesting and useful.
--
As I wrote to POC yesterday:
"Well, after a lot of googling and trial and error gropi
On 04/13/16 14:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Thanks to all for the interesting
responses, I always learn something
from them ...
Did you try those terminal commands I
suggested in an earlier email? The
results from those would be
interesting and useful.
--
As I wrote to POC yesterday:
"Well, a
On 04/13/2016 11:50 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The regular software such as Shotwell works well for getting pictures
off the camera and onto the computer and the SD card files can be
accessed easily enough with a card reader so I don't think this warrants
any more time spent looking for alternatives.
On 04/12/16 19:11, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>You said it is a Nikon S3100? I just checked the manual and the camera
>should support PTP and MTP. Check the output of:
I too looked at a S3100 manual and found this strange footnote:
Notes on Connecting the Camera to a Printer
• When Auto is sele
On 04/13/2016 07:40 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Thank you for all the comments.
What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that
it's the files in
/var/cache/yum/x86_64/22
that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show
the current date of my last upd
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, CS DBA wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I've installed thermald, added it to
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local and so far have not seen a single cpu temp alert.
That package installs a systemd unit. It shouldn't be necessary to add
it to rc.local.
--
Chris Murphy
--
user
On 04/13/2016 10:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, CS DBA wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, I've installed thermald, added it to
/etc/rc.d/rc.local and so far have not seen a single cpu temp alert.
That package installs a systemd unit. It shouldn't be necessary to ad
On 04/13/16 10:42, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:12 -0500, g wrote:
>> ===>
>> i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*".
>
> No, it uses /var/cache/dnf.
>
===>
my bad. i thought i had read in in this list. please excuse.
--
peace out.
If Bil
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:12 -0500, g wrote:
> ===>
> i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*".
No, it uses /var/cache/dnf.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/
On 04/13/16 09:40, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> Thank you for all the comments.
>
> What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that
> it's the files in
>
> /var/cache/yum/x86_64/22
>
===>
i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*".
> that are being upda
On 04/12/2016 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:41 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi all;
Daily I see anywhere from 10 - 50 or more of these alerts via abrt. I'm
running Fedora 23 (KDE Spin) fully up to date on a Lenovo X1 carbo
Thank you for all the comments.
What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that
it's the files in
/var/cache/yum/x86_64/22
that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show
the current date of my last update.
I'll go ahead and rm -rf the yum and
Hi Jon
> It seems to have changed name to "Gnome Theme Tweak". I installed it and
> now I have "Gnome Shell Integration" plugin installed. I did have to activate
> it
> to get it working, but didn't need restart Firefox.
I installed "Gnome Theme Tweak" and was then able to install the Taskbar
e
Den 2016-04-13 kl. 11:36, skrev David Aldrich:
> Hi
>
>> OK, need to install the plugin "Gnome Shell Integration" in your browser. I
>> am
>> using Firefox but there should be plugin for Chrome also.
>> Yes, I checked that the plugin exist so install it and you should be able to
>> install
>> "
Hi
> OK, need to install the plugin "Gnome Shell Integration" in your browser. I am
> using Firefox but there should be plugin for Chrome also.
> Yes, I checked that the plugin exist so install it and you should be able to
> install
> "Gnome Shell Integration".
I'm sorry, but I am still struggl
38 matches
Mail list logo
