On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 19:11 -0500, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> Just reading this now (sorry).
>
> I'm adding the following:
>
> http://kjchome.homeip.net/Fedora-Live-Desktop-i686-20
> http://kjchome.homeip.net/Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-20
>
Thanks for taking the trouble.
I found the images at http
Allegedly, on or about 05 February 2016, g sent:
> something that amazes me is that with all the add-ons that have been
> written for cookie handling, none have a feature that ties in to url
> bar or bookmarks that will disable/enable cookies with out user having
> to make selection.
Allowing coo
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:50:41 +1030
Tim wrote:
> I wonder how many sites actually do "content negotiation" properly?
> (The proper name for that activity.)
>
> Sites are well known to just give you their pages, and throw files at
> you, no matter what. Browsers are well known to say they accept
On 02/04/16 15:07, stan wrote:
<<>>
> I notice that lately they have begun to show google advertising with
> their results,
that is an interesting observation.
especially because i have run ixquick every day for past week and i saw
now such advertising.
granted, ixquick does show a star at en
On 02/04/16 21:42, Robin Laing wrote:
> I only see one that looks like it will give me Ask Me Every Time.
>
> Cookie Controller
>
.
this is true. if you want to make a selection every time you load a
site and change pages.
tried that some years ago with a diff add-on and soon tired of having
to
On 02/04/16 19:48, Robin Laing wrote:
<<>>
> Interesting that ixquick.com and startpage.com are both pointed to in
> this thread and they look exactly the same. Even their privacy statements
> are the same bar names
>
.
have you run a check via a url/ip/whois server?
i believe not. ;-)
--
pe
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Tom Rivers wrote:
On 2/4/2016 4:07 PM, ven...@billoblog.com wrote:
Is there something like denyhosts for sasl attacks? I'm getting tired
of stuff like this:
Jan 31 04:52:38 hope saslauthd[1333]: do_auth : auth failure:
[user=abby] [service=smtp] [realm=billob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2016 05:33 PM, Dustin Kempter wrote:
> Hello all, I am having an issue. I have a vm with an html file
> that SELINUX is blocking access to. From a webpage I can not access
> the page unless SELINUX is disabled. I would rather not have it
> dis
On 5 February 2016 at 13:24, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:06:19PM +0300, Hiisi wrote:
>> > Yes. Well, C. http://libusb.info/
>> Thanks a lot!
>> Stupid gmail webinterface doesn't allow me to change topic. Otherwise I
>> would mark the topic as [solved].
>
> Well, it's a maili
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:06:19PM +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> > Yes. Well, C. http://libusb.info/
> Thanks a lot!
> Stupid gmail webinterface doesn't allow me to change topic. Otherwise I
> would mark the topic as [solved].
Well, it's a mailing list, so you can't really change the whole thread
topic. B
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 21:03 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> TO be able to select a particluar sequence of tracks to play
> without having to re-arrange the displayed playlist.
If you want the developer to pay any attention, report it via Bugzilla.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 5 February 2016 at 02:48, Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> Yes. Well, C. http://libusb.info/
>
>
Thanks a lot!
Stupid gmail webinterface doesn't allow me to change topic. Otherwise I
would mark the topic as [solved].
--
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: https://linuxcounter.net/
-
Tim:
>> I wonder if any browsers have a randomiser in them to jiggle the
>> tell-tale signs that browser fingerprinting makes use of?
stan:
> I'm not aware of a plug in that does that, though I think it is
> possible to change some of the information the browser gives out. The
> trouble is that w
On 02/05/2016 01:37 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 11:11 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
Not only is it https, it promises to keep no records of your searches
or even your IP
Do you believe that? Or anything said to you about a website's aims?
And even if it is a true statement, it's only valid
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 11:11 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Not only is it https, it promises to keep no records of your searches
> or even your IP
Do you believe that? Or anything said to you about a website's aims?
And even if it is a true statement, it's only valid *then*. They may do
something els
On 5 Feb 2016 12:10 a.m., "Dustin Kempter"
wrote:
>
> Here is the file location as well as the output
>
> [root@pgbadger1 pgbadger2]# pwd
> /var/www/html/monitoring/pgbadger2
>
> [root@pgbadger1 pgbadger2]# ls -Z
> -rwxr-xr-x. apache apache unconfined_u:object_r:var_t:s0 pgbadger2.html
>
>
>
>Fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
