This suggests installation using vnc over ipv6 is supported:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/Ipv6OnlyInstallation
But when I use inst.vnc boot option, I get an text screen that says to
connect to an ipv4 address, an ipv6 address isn't listed. When I go to
a shell and use 'ip addr'
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 17:23, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 January 2016 at 17:07, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
I couldn't agree more bruce.
It's the 1% who get paid too
Allegedly, on or about 26 January 2016, arnaud gaboury sent:
> Now when testing with telent, I don't have the answer expected :
> 220 mail.thetradinghall.com ESMTP Postfix
>
> $ telnet mail.thetradinghall.com 25
> Trying 212.147.52.214...
> Connected to mail.thetradinghall.com.
> Escape character
Allegedly, on or about 26 January 2016, Ranbir sent:
> You made me realize I hadn't actually tried to auto mount the NFS
> shares from the terminal. I went to my auto mount location and I was
> told there was no such file or directory. Then I remembered the last
> time I was trying to auto mount th
Allegedly, on or about 26 January 2016, Gary Stainburn sent:
> I've just had to replace my Hylafax server as the cooling fan in the rack
> case
> has died and could not be replaced.
>
> This means that I now have 3 lots of:
>
> USB to seral converter
>
> I was wondering if there a better w
On 01/26/2016 04:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 26 January 2016 at 21:05, jd1008 wrote:
Have cdrdao-1.2.3-23.fc22.x86_64 installed, but no gcdmaster available.
Does anyone know of whereabouts of it?
dnf says no match for gcdmaster.
Looks gone, merged into cdrdao,
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org
On 26 January 2016 at 21:05, jd1008 wrote:
> Have cdrdao-1.2.3-23.fc22.x86_64 installed, but no gcdmaster available.
> Does anyone know of whereabouts of it?
> dnf says no match for gcdmaster.
>
Looks gone, merged into cdrdao,
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gcdmaster.git/
Then removed
Have cdrdao-1.2.3-23.fc22.x86_64 installed, but no gcdmaster available.
Does anyone know of whereabouts of it?
dnf says no match for gcdmaster.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 26 January 2016 at 17:23, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 26 January 2016 at 17:07, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>>> I couldn't agree more bruce.
>>>
>>> It's the 1% who get paid too much for doing too little that have such
>>> indulgent luxuries.
On Monday 25 Jan 2016 19:06:11 Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> LOL!!!
>
> I feel you bruce :)
>
> I think a LOT of people are struggling (and frustrated, rightfully so) with
> SELinux and simply place it in permissive mode. There is nothing wrong with
> doing this. Don't buy into the fear mongering hype.
On Monday 25 Jan 2016 19:06:11 Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> LOL!!!
>
> I feel you bruce :)
>
> I think a LOT of people are struggling (and frustrated, rightfully so) with
> SELinux and simply place it in permissive mode. There is nothing wrong with
> doing this. Don't buy into the fear mongering hype.
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 16:57, bruce wrote:
>> What the Heck???
>>
>> So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, instead of
>> diving in to "learn" it are just lazy Lord.. shaking my head..
>>
>> How about.. some might be lazy
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 17:07, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>> I couldn't agree more bruce.
>>
>> It's the 1% who get paid too much for doing too little that have such
>> indulgent luxuries.
>>
>> The rest of us 99% have to work for it :P
>>
>>
>
The bank is the bank. I don't work on a bank. I work at home, with a very
limited Internet connection, and on things that are far away from sys
administration. And no, I won't lose my work. It's backed up.
And Bruce said for a while, not permanently. Why all this fuss?
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Tuesday
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
> Failing to protect user data properly over here (UK) can attract serious
> fines.
As it should be all over the World. I image that some sort of cease
and desist should exist for companies with poorly protected user
information. I would ultimat
On 26 January 2016 at 17:07, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> I couldn't agree more bruce.
>
> It's the 1% who get paid too much for doing too little that have such
> indulgent luxuries.
>
> The rest of us 99% have to work for it :P
>
>
Remember that next time your bank gets hacked.
--
imalone
http://
BTW... Yes, you can disable SELinux. Once you have your work done, you can
enable or keep it disabled, as you like it.
Hope it helps,
Sylvia
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016, bruce wrote:
> What the Heck???
>
> So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, instead of
> diving in to "learn"
On 26 January 2016 at 16:57, bruce wrote:
> What the Heck???
>
> So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, instead of
> diving in to "learn" it are just lazy Lord.. shaking my head..
>
> How about.. some might be lazy..
>
> Or, some have a bunch of different things to get accompli
I couldn't agree more bruce.
It's the 1% who get paid too much for doing too little that have such indulgent
luxuries.
The rest of us 99% have to work for it :P
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 8:57 AM, bruce wrote:
>
> What the Heck???
>
> So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, inste
Totally agree with you, Bruce.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016, bruce wrote:
> What the Heck???
>
> So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, instead of
> diving in to "learn" it are just lazy Lord.. shaking my head..
>
> How about.. some might be lazy..
>
> Or, s
What the Heck???
So.. people who think/decide to just disable seLinux, instead of
diving in to "learn" it are just lazy Lord.. shaking my head..
How about.. some might be lazy..
Or, some have a bunch of different things to get accomplished, and
aren't looking to be a sysAdmin, so they want
On 01/26/16 19:12, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> $ telnet mail.thetradinghall.com 25
> Trying 212.147.52.214...
> Connected to mail.thetradinghall.com.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> -
>
> I must have misconfigured something, but I have no idea what. After
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 21:22 +, Junk wrote:
> As an alternative you could install and start autofs server. Then in
> nautilus go to /net/servername/path/on/server
I actually use autofs for these NFS shares, but restarting the service
before didn't help: nautilus still complained. However, I've
I am running Fedora 23 server. Among other services, I want to deploy
a mail server with postfix.
1- I registered on my DNS provider a A and MX records:
mail.thetradinghall.com.86400INA212.147.52.214
thetradinghall.com.8
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 14:05 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 25 January 2016, Greg Woods sent:
> > (I can't remember how to get a dump of the zone, but I remember doing
> > it in the past.
>
> Simply stopping the nameserver ought to cause it to reconcile its
> records on file. That's wh
I've just had to replace my Hylafax server as the cooling fan in the rack case
has died and could not be replaced.
My box runs three fax modems, one for each of the original 3 fax machines that
got skipped years ago.
This means that I now have 3 lots of:
USB to seral converter (new box doesn't
26 matches
Mail list logo
