Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Tim
Tim: >> That can't be the only place they're put. Fernando Cassia: > The ID3 info is put at the end of MP3 files, that is per design. > (Actually, a clever hack, so mp3 player that don't know anything about > id3 could still play the files). But I've listened to radio streams using MP3 encodin

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:28:33 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > The ID3 info is put at the end of MP3 files, that is per design. Only ID3v1. Unless you're stuck in history, ID3v2 is current and found in most MP3 files. Normally, it's prepended to files as a header, but can also be appended to files

Re: Is an iPad Pro just a companion device? Microsoft thinks so.

2016-01-12 Thread Doug
Title: CNET Community newsletter On 01/12/2016 10:09 PM, CNET Community wrote: "Is an iPad Pro just a companion device? Microsoft thinks so."

Re: basic graphics mode/text?

2016-01-12 Thread Earl A Ramirez
> > > You can add nomodeset to the kernel argument and that will give you what you are looking for, let me know if that works -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

basic graphics mode/text?

2016-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Ross
I've just installed an Fedora 23 system which I purposely did not include X-windows as the machine will always be accessed remotely. My problem is I want to disable or force a basic graphics mode upon boot-up, currently when the system boots is reaches a specific point and the display changes

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
On 01/12/2016 05:12 PM, g wrote: On 01/12/16 16:10, jd1008 wrote: <<>> I reverted to version 31 and now undelete message works as expected. you may want to use a different solution. there have been several security updates from time of ver 31. most recent is: https://rhn.redhat.com/e

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread g
On 01/12/16 16:10, jd1008 wrote: <<>> > I reverted to version 31 and now undelete message works as expected. > you may want to use a different solution. there have been several security updates from time of ver 31. most recent is: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0001.html -- pea

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/12/2016 03:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: I think the "undelete" thing pushes the messages from the deleted folder to the inbox of the default account (the one in boldface). It may also depend on what kind of mail account the message was deleted from. Deleting from a POP3 account makes it a bit

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
On 01/12/2016 04:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/12/2016 01:50 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/12/2016 02:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing th

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 01/12/2016 01:50 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/12/2016 02:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Just further to my previous response, I h

Re: [FORGED] thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Rolf Turner
On 13/01/16 09:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? I am running thunderbird 38.5.1 and "Edit" gives me an option "Undo" (no "Undo Delete Message"). I just deleted your message,

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
On 01/12/2016 02:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Just further to my previous response, I have now found the "restored" message, b

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
On 01/12/2016 02:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Just further to my previous response, I have now found the "restored" message, b

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
On 01/12/2016 02:08 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Hi, I'm using a daily build of upstream Thunderbird (46.0a1) and in my version E

Re: 'urlsnarf' sniffer fails with "undefined symbol: ip_fast_csum"

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:36 PM, stan wrote: > > Looks like a bug. I think something in the library has changed. Your > best bet is to open a bugzilla at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > for libnids. There are no open tickets for libnids right now, so no > one else has reported this error. No

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > Why are we on this bizarre sidetrack > about whether you can use tail to get id3 information? > I don't know. ;) You implied that the Unix way was not appropiate for multimedia content, I said you could use text mode utils just fine, and that

Re: 'urlsnarf' sniffer fails with "undefined symbol: ip_fast_csum"

2016-01-12 Thread stan
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:17:48 -0500 Fernando Cassia wrote: > 32-bit F23 Mate spin, here > > I install the dsniff package to use urlsnarf... [snip] > So I launch it > # urlsnarf > urlsnarf: listening on wlp2s0 [tcp port 80 or port 8080 or port 3128] > > All is well until I go to Firefox 41 and

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > Of course you can have single tools that act on files to get well > defined information. But while it's a useful model it doesn't work > well in all situations. > All I wanted was mpg123 so I could play a darn mp3 file. ;) KDE/Gnome wizards ca

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Just further to my previous response, I have now found the "restored" message, but the restore moved it to the Inbox of a differe

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 13/01/16 07:27, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? Hi, I'm using a daily build of upstream Thunderbird (46.0a1) and in my version Edit -> Undo Delete Message brings deleted message

Re: Live image installation fails to recognize existing LVM volumes

2016-01-12 Thread Mike Wright
On 01/12/2016 11:04 AM, Emmett Culley wrote: I attempted to install the KDE live image for Fedora 23 and found that the installer would not recognize existing LVM logical volumes. It the past (Fedora 21), I was able to select existing LVM volumes from the "unknown" list and cause the OS to be

Re: thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/12/2016 12:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? I can't say that I ever have, but I've never tried it, either. Once in a while, my trackball will stick for a moment, del

thunderbird-38.4.0-1.fc22.x86_64

2016-01-12 Thread jd1008
Edit -> Undo Delete Message does not bring deleted message back to Inbox Tried it many times to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Cod

Re: Live image installation fails to recognize existing LVM volumes

2016-01-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 01/12/2016 11:04 AM, Emmett Culley wrote: I attempted to install the KDE live image for Fedora 23 and found that the installer would not recognize existing LVM logical volumes. It the past (Fedora 21), I was able to select existing LVM volumes from the "unknown" list and cause the OS to be

Live image installation fails to recognize existing LVM volumes

2016-01-12 Thread Emmett Culley
I attempted to install the KDE live image for Fedora 23 and found that the installer would not recognize existing LVM logical volumes. It the past (Fedora 21), I was able to select existing LVM volumes from the "unknown" list and cause the OS to be installed on existing LVM logical volumes. No

Alert updates

2016-01-12 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, On one machine I get the alerts when I need to update fedora 22, but not on another machine. What should I set up to get the alerts working properly? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Ian Malone
On 12 January 2016 at 16:17, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> >> >> You are proposing having an http server in the way as *simpler*? >> Anyway, again, id3 tag lengths are not fixed. > > > don't twist my words, Ian. > > I introduced a web server

Re: synergy not working, might be firewall related

2016-01-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 01/12/2016 09:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/12/2016 04:11 AM, thibaut noah wrote: Hello, i'm trying to get synergy to work between fedora and my vm/macbook, problem is i apparently have a connection issue, someone told me there was a firewall on fedora but i couldn't find proper documentat

Re: synergy not working, might be firewall related

2016-01-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 01/12/2016 04:11 AM, thibaut noah wrote: Hello, i'm trying to get synergy to work between fedora and my vm/macbook, problem is i apparently have a connection issue, someone told me there was a firewall on fedora but i couldn't find proper documentation on how to allow synergy on it, any help w

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Ian Malone wrote: > > > You are proposing having an http server in the way as *simpler*? > Anyway, again, id3 tag lengths are not fixed. don't twist my words, Ian. I introduced a web server into the argument that you can't get id3 tags with a single tool, and

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Ian Malone
On 12 January 2016 at 14:31, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> If you want to do that >> you have to cheat and cache everything before you start playback. Or, >> in more general terms, doing anything non-linear with multimedia >> information is ve

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Tim wrote: > > That can't be the only place they're put. The ID3 info is put at the end of MP3 files, that is per design. (Actually, a clever hack, so mp3 player that don't know anything about id3 could still play the files). FC -- During times of Universal

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 12 January 2016, Ian Malone sent: > Actually, the various ID3 tags that Michael refers to are separate > binary blocks bunged on at the end. That can't be the only place they're put. For instance, you can stream audio using MP3 compression, and see metadata as it streams.

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Ian Malone wrote: > If you want to do that > you have to cheat and cache everything before you start playback. Or, > in more general terms, doing anything non-linear with multimedia > information is very difficult to handle in a streamed manner > No. I never said

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Ian Malone
On 12 January 2016 at 13:40, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: >> >> such as when searching for ID3 >> tags in an MP3 file. > > > You could also use gnu 'tail' part of gnu textutils -I believe it's now > called coreutils-, to get the last 'n' b

'urlsnarf' sniffer fails with "undefined symbol: ip_fast_csum"

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
32-bit F23 Mate spin, here I install the dsniff package to use urlsnarf... # dnf install dsniff Last metadata expiration check performed 0:35:54 ago on Tue Jan 12 08:24:21 2016. Dependencies resolved. Package

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Ian Malone
On 12 January 2016 at 13:39, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: >> >> Which would get funny, if you wanted to seek back and forth in a large >> chunk of data fed to a program via stdin, such as when searching for ID3 >> tags in an MP3 file. > > >

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > such as when searching for ID3 > tags in an MP3 file. > You could also use gnu 'tail' part of gnu textutils -I believe it's now called coreutils-, to get the last 'n' bytes of a file, and there's your ID3 info... FC -- users mailing l

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Which would get funny, if you wanted to seek back and forth in a large > chunk of data fed to a program via stdin, such as when searching for ID3 > tags in an MP3 file. > Which gets back to my point, that doesn't prevent big media player

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:02:59 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Well, "the Unix way" is you have programs that send everything to standard > output, then redirect as needed by other apps. Which would get funny, if you wanted to seek back and forth in a large chunk of data fed to a program via stdin,

Re: mpg123 not included, why?

2016-01-12 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > > There's some logic to that, but all some illogic. Would you have yet > > another binary program to play wav files, another for oggs, another for > > flac, and have to call the right one for each audio file you want to > > play? Or would you

synergy not working, might be firewall related

2016-01-12 Thread thibaut noah
Hello, i'm trying to get synergy to work between fedora and my vm/macbook, problem is i apparently have a connection issue, someone told me there was a firewall on fedora but i couldn't find proper documentation on how to allow synergy on it, any help would be welcome. -- users mailing list users@