On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:49:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> OK, this is hung! Nothing has been added to the directory for the past three
> hours. Killing it, but any ideas as to what is going wrong?
>
> Btw, how do I get around this?
Hard to tell without knowing what (sub)processes are still runn
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:20:33 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 08:42 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > $ rpmbuild -bp MySpec
> >
> > ...
> > the tar package does not download.
>
> rpmbuild doesn't download sources, but IIRC "fedpkg" does.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pa
On 12/05/15 04:02, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:22:19PM +1030, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 03 December 2015, Suvayu Ali sent:
>>> I restarted cups to make sure the plugins are loaded
>>> properly. Now printing a test page tells me this:
>>>
>>> processing
Hi Tim,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:22:19PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 03 December 2015, Suvayu Ali sent:
> > I restarted cups to make sure the plugins are loaded
> > properly. Now printing a test page tells me this:
> >
> > processing since
> > Thu 03 Dec 2015 05:41:19 PM IST
On 12/04/2015 10:20 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/04/2015 08:42 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
$ rpmbuild -bp MySpec
...
the tar package does not download.
rpmbuild doesn't download sources, but IIRC "fedpkg" does.
Uhm, yeah, but from dist-git repos only, I think. fedora-review
als
On 12/04/2015 10:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 09:30 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
To make sure the lockfile gets deleted, you must create a function
that deletes the lockfile, and specify that function in a trap call
to trap SIGINT, SIGTERM, etc. That way it cleans up aft
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 09:30 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> To make sure the lockfile gets deleted, you must create a function
> that deletes the lockfile, and specify that function in a trap call
> to trap SIGINT, SIGTERM, etc. That way it cleans up after itself if
> you abort it.
For Shell scripts
On 12/04/2015 08:42 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
$ rpmbuild -bp MySpec
...
the tar package does not download.
rpmbuild doesn't download sources, but IIRC "fedpkg" does.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
OK, this is hung! Nothing has been added to the directory for the past three
hours. Killing it, but any ideas as to what is going wrong?
Btw, how do I get around this?
> INFO: WARNING: Probably non-rawhide buildroot used. Rawhide should be used
> for most package reviews
Many thanks,
Ranjan
O
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:01:11 -0800
Dave Close wrote:
> F21 doesn't appear to be in the archive, only in the current download
> site, although I thought F21 was EOL.
Yeah, we usually don't move it over to archive until a few weeks after
EOL.
> When I try to access it, I get
> this response.
On 12/04/2015 05:29 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
in fact, I just had to delete the .lock file. I do not understand why
it was there.
Many commands create a lock file so that you can't run multiple copies
of the command simultaneously. If you had two users running that
command, both writing to the s
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:42:02 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> Source0: github.com/rstudio/rstudio/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz
> $ rpmbuild -bp MySpec
>
> ...
> the tar package does not download.
>
> The URL is fine as tested with wget, and with
> https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio/archi
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:42 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> Source0: github.com/rstudio/rstudio/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz
>
Ther's no "https://"; on the front.
the tar package does not download.
>
rpmbuild will not download it for you that I know of.
Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
user
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:42 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> here is the begining of my spec file:
>
> -
> Name: rstudio-server
> Version: 0.99.800
> Release: 1%{?dist}
> Summary: Rstudio Server lets you access Rstudio from anywhere using
here is the begining of my spec file:
-
Name: rstudio-server
Version: 0.99.800
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Rstudio Server lets you access Rstudio from anywhere using a
web browser
URL: http://www.rstudio.com
Source0: github.com/rstudi
On 12/04/2015 07:13 AM, Beartooth wrote:
error: Failed to dlopen /usr/lib64/rpm-plugins/selinux.so /lib64/
librpm.so.7: file too short
It looks like that file (/lib64/librpm.so.7) is damaged. Since all of
the rpm related tools use that library, you'll probably need to extract
it from a simil
Hi,
I have been trying to run fedora-review on a simple bugzilla package review
request and it appears to be hung:
$ fedora-review -b 1118885
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1118885
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1118885
INFO: --> SRPM url:
https://jamesnz.fedorapeople.org/gsimpleca
I keep trying to do dnf update on F22, in order to be able to
upgrade it to F23. But when it starts downloading files, it denies them:
[]
(243/244): nss-3.21.0-1.1.fc22.i 433 kB/s | 871 kB 00:02
(244/244): pluma-data-1.12.0-1.f 487 kB/s | 2.7 MB 00:05
On 11/27/2015 09:05 PM, Alex wrote:
> I've looked in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> and all are set to "performance".
>
> What is the procedure for disabling CPU throttling permanently?
Please note that, even if you configure everything for performance,
the throttling c
in fact, I just had to delete the .lock file. I do not understand why
it was there.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraprojec
20 matches
Mail list logo
