Thank you!
(The rsync flags that Anaconda uses is definitely a plus)
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 23:58 Chris Murphy wrote:
> The gist is:
>
> cryptsetup, you can use the defaults which uses aes-xts-plain64 with a
> 256 bit key. I like the -y and -v options.
>
> You'll need to create or modify the /etc
The gist is:
cryptsetup, you can use the defaults which uses aes-xts-plain64 with a
256 bit key. I like the -y and -v options.
You'll need to create or modify the /etc/crypttab file, which takes the form of:
none
The name can be anything but I do it the anaconda way which is
luks- and then is
Look Arch Linux's wiki for LUKS / dm-crypt, you will probably need to read
some documentation but in an hour or less you should be able to create an
encrypted partition, an encrypted swap, learn how to unlock it manually or
via cryptab/cryptsecrets and so on.
GL.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 22:21 Chris
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 20:21:25 -0500,
Chris Adams wrote:
I have a running Fedora 21 system. I would like to make a backup of it
to a USB drive, a clone that can be booted. I know how to do all the
"normal" stuff (partition, LVM, mkfs, rsync, and GRUB), but I'd like the
USB drive to be encry
I have a running Fedora 21 system. I would like to make a backup of it
to a USB drive, a clone that can be booted. I know how to do all the
"normal" stuff (partition, LVM, mkfs, rsync, and GRUB), but I'd like the
USB drive to be encrypted, and I don't know how to set that up manually
(I haven't m
Michael,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema
>
> ?
Reading this was a great help and I have been able to create a rpm (which
works). Here is the rpm
if someone is interested.
https://streaming.stat.iastate.edu/~stat580/fedora/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.f
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:25:32PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Fred Smith
> wrote:
>
> > Yews, I believe that is correct. But just to save yourself some grief, make
> > sure
> > that ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs are installed BEFORE you do that.
>
> ntfs-3g is includ
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> Yews, I believe that is correct. But just to save yourself some grief, make
> sure
> that ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs are installed BEFORE you do that.
ntfs-3g is included by default in Fedora Workstation, but it's not
needed on UEFI installs for
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 16:23:54 Chris Murphy wrote:
> > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
> efibootmgr -v## to list the boots
> efibootmgr -o ,0001,0002etc ## to explicitly set the order,
Chris, your advice has been priceless and spot on.
I now have a laptop that boots in
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:09:29PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote:
> > ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
> >
> > This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
> > So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then re
> Are you aware of
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema
>
> ?
Thanks, no. I will take a look.
>
> > I guess trying to package this was not a very smart idea: issues here are
> > getting to be beyond me.
> >
>
> Have you ever before installed this
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:41:18 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> However, there appears to be some errors in the actual application. Upon
> installing, I get:
>
>
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib/Builder.py:81: Warning: The
> property GtkWindow:has-resize-grip is deprecated and shouldn
And just FYI the Fedora NVRAM entry (revealed with efibootmgr -v)
doesn't point to GRUB, it points to shim.efi. That's normal.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fe
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote:
>> ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
>>
>> This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
>> So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mk
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote:
> ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
>
> This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
> So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig
> -o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location.
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:01:25 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files
> > not packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem?
> >
>
> > error: Installed
On 07/15/15 21:40, François Patte wrote:
> Le 15/07/2015 15:32, Paul Cartwright a écrit :
>> On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote:
>>> I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable
>>> to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find
>>> the gpg key
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files not
> packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem?
>
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
Well, obviously you need to edit the %fil
Le 15/07/2015 15:32, Paul Cartwright a écrit :
> On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote:
>> I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable
>> to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find
>> the gpg key.
>>
>> Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and
On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote:
> I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable
> to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find
> the gpg key.
>
> Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU.
>
> Using Enigmail>Manage keys show
Bonjour,
I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable
to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find
the gpg key.
Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU.
Using Enigmail>Manage keys shows that the key is there and valid...
What's wro
Hi,
Thanks (to Richard also)!
> Do some trouble-shooting. As a first step, forget rpmbuild. Run the
> same commands you run in %build and %install in your terminal. If
> the commands fail, you need to fix the source code and cannot blame
> rpmbuild or the spec file.
I was not familiar with setup
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ranjan Maitra <
maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application:
>
> https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon
>
> but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks for a
> desktop file, rat
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:13 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/13/15 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 18:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 07/13/15 17:27, Jean Jacques wrote:
> > > > will not generated an module for kernel but works well under
> > > > 4.0.6
> > > >
> >
++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig
-o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
On 07/13/15 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 18:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/13/15 17:27, Jean Jacques wrote:
>>> will not generated an module for kernel but works well under 4.0.6
>>>
>> I see you got your answer on the rpmfusion list.
>>
>> When you have a problem
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 16:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/29/linux_foundation_core_infrast
> ructure_initiative_update/
>
I don't think there's any point in posting old stories from The
Register (or anywhere else for that matter) unless you have something
to add to
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 16:33 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> Forwarded Message
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/30/sha_2_migration_headaches/
This report is nearly 3 months old and says nothing about Fedora, or
even Linux.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
Right, attempt 2.
As I started to say, thanks for the help Chris. The log file has been posted
to:
http://www.stainburn.com/grub2-mkconfig.log
Now that the Windows side is working again, I'm wondering if it's worth biting
thr bullet and doing a new clean Fedora install. At the moment I'm st
Thanks for your help Chris, this is invaluable
I've posted the log to
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guideli
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:27:53 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > I guess it might be helpful to know the difference between a desktop
> > > and a desktop.in file. Could someone please tell me about this
> > > difference?
A *.in file is an input/include file, i.e. a template file that is
taken by a
On 07/14/2015 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:10:05 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Could you be more verbose. What exactly are people supposed to
install and which themes/settinga are known to work?
Any theme that has both a gtk2 and gtk3 version should mostly work.
adwaita
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 13:06 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I assume you mean in Fedora Bugzilla, in which case probably not.
>
>
Ok, thanks. Yes, I meant Fedora bugzilla.
> Note that the Evolution list is usually a better place to ask about
> Evo
> , see https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list
33 matches
Mail list logo
